Investigating Different Options for Reheating the First Converter Inlet Stream of Sulfur Recovery Units (SRUs)
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33090
Investigating Different Options for Reheating the First Converter Inlet Stream of Sulfur Recovery Units (SRUs)

Authors: H. Ganji, H. R. Mahdipoor, J. Ahmadpanah, H. Naderi

Abstract:

The modified Claus process is the major technology for the recovery of elemental sulfur from hydrogen sulfide. The chemical reactions that can occur in the reaction furnace are numerous and many byproducts such as carbon disulfide and carbon carbonyl sulfide are produced. These compounds can often contribute from 20 to 50% of the pollutants and therefore, should be hydrolyzed in the catalytic converter. The inlet temperature of the first catalytic reactor should be maintained over than 250 °C, to hydrolyze COS and CS2. In this paper, the various configurations for the first converter reheating of sulfur recovery unit are investigated. As a result, the performance of each method is presented for a typical clause unit. The results show that the hot gas method seems to be better than the other methods.

Keywords: Sulfur recovery unit, reaction converter.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1329523

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2366

References:


[1] M. P. Elsner, M. Menge , C. M├╝ller, D. W Agar, "The Claus process: teaching an old dog new tricks", Catalysis Today 79-80, 2003,pp. 487- 494.
[2] J. S Eow, "Recovery of Sulfur from Sour Acid Gas: A Review of the Technology", H. Fisher, Burner/Fire box design improves sulfur recovery, Hydrocarbon processing, 1974, pp. 27-30.
[3] B ZareNezhad, An investigation on the most important influencing parameters regarding the selection of the proper catalysts for Claus SRU converters, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 15, 2009, pp. 143-147.
[4] S. Signor, F. Manenti, M. G. Grottoli, P. Fabbri, and, S. Pierucci, Sulfur Recovery Units: Adaptive Simulation and Model Validation on an Industrial Plant, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49, pp.5714-5724.
[5] K. A. Hawboldt, W. D. Monnery, W. Y. Svrcek, "A Study on the Effect of Quench Design on the Quality of Experimental Data", Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1999, 38 (6), pp. 2260-2263.
[6] L. V. Nasato, K. Karan, A. K. Mehrotra, and, L. A. Behie, "Modeling Reaction Quench Times in the Waste Heat Boiler of a Claus Plant", Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1994, 33, pp. 7-13.
[7] N. I. Dowling, J. B. Hyne, and D. M. Brown, "Kinetics of the Reaction between Hydrogen and Sulfur under High-Temperature Claus Furnace Conditions", Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1990, 29, pp. 2327-2332.
[8] H. R Mahdipoor, R. Hayati, R. Khorsand, H Javaherizadeh, "Effect of Reaction Furnace and Converter Temperatures on Performance of Sulfur Recovery Units (SRUs), Journal of Petroleum Science Research, accepted to published, 2012.
[9] G McIntyre, L. Lyddon, "Claus Sulphur Recovery Options", Bryan Research and Engineering, Inc. Technical Papers, Bryan, Texas.
[10] H.M. Huisman, P. van der Berg, R. Mos, A.J. van Dillen, and J.W. Geus, "Hydrolysis of Carbon Sulfides on Titania and Alumina Catalysts: The Influence of Water", Applied Catalysis A, 115 ,1994, pp. 157-172.
[11] T.A. Gens, "Decrease in Carbonyl Sulfide in the Feed to Claus Converters by Shift Catalysts", Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 33, 1994, pp. 1654-1656.
[12] , H.G. Paskall, "Reaction Furnace Chemistry and Operational Modes", Proceedings of Gas Sweetening and Sulphur Recovery Seminar, Comprimo/Western Research, Amsterdam (November, 1982).
[13] Sames, J.A., Dale, P.R., Wong, B.: ┬ÀEvaluation of Reaction Furnace Variables in Modified-Claus Plants┬À Proceedings of Lawrence Reid Gas Conditioning Conference, Norman, Oklahoma, (March, 1987).
[14] E., I. Laperdrix, , G Justin, , O. Costentin, J.C. Saur, A. Lavalley, , J.L. Aboulayt, and C. Nedez, "Comparative Study of CS2 Hydrolysis Catalyzed by Alumina and Titania", Applied Catalysis B: Environment, 17,1998, pp. 167-173.
[15] D.M J. Puchyr, A.K Mehrotra, LA Behie, and N. Kalogerakis, "Hydrodynamic and Kinetic Modeling of Circulating Fluidized Bed Reactors Applied to a Modified Claus Plant", Chem. Eng. Sci. 51 ,1996,pp. 5251-5262.
[16] A.G. Maadah and R.N. Maddox, "Predict Claus Product", Hydrocarbon Processing 57 ,1978, pp. 143-146.
[17] R.A. Burns, R.B Lippert, and R.K. Kerr, "Choose Catalyst Objectively", Hydrocarbon Processing, 53 ,1974, pp. 181-186.
[18] Z.M. George, "Effect of Catalyst Basically for COS, SO2 and COS Hydrolysis Reactions", J. catalysis, 35 ,1974, pp. 218-224.
[19] R.J.A.M. Terorde, PJ. van den Brink, L.M. Visser, A.J. van Dillen, and G.W. Geuss, "Selective Oxidation of Hydrogen Sulfide to Elemental Sulfur Using Iron Oxide Catalysts on Various Supports", Catalysis Today 17 ,1993, pp. 217-224.
[20] Gas Processors Suppliers Association (GPSA). Engineering Data Book; GPSA Tulsa, 1987; Chapter 22.