Learning through Shared Procedures -A Case of Using Technology to Bridge the Gap between Theory and Practice in Officer Education
In this article we explore how computer assisted exercises may allow for bridging the traditional gap between theory and practice in professional education. To educate officers able to master the complexity of the battlefield the Norwegian Military Academy needs to develop a learning environment that allows for creating viable connections between the educational environment and the field of practice. In response to this challenge we explore the conditions necessary to make computer assisted training systems (CATS) a useful tool to create structural similarities between an educational context and the field of military practice. Although, CATS may facilitate work procedures close to real life situations, this case do demonstrate how professional competence also must build on viable learning theories and environments. This paper explores the conditions that allow for using simulators to facilitate professional competence from within an educational setting. We develop a generic didactic model that ascribes learning to participation in iterative cycles of action and reflection. The development of this model is motivated by the need to develop an interdisciplinary professional education rooted in the pattern of military practice.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1074726Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 849
 M. Levin and D. Greenwood, "Pragmatic Action Research and the Struggle to Transform Universities into Learning Communities," in Handbook of Action Research, P. Reason and H. Bradbury, Eds. Sage: London, 2001, pp 103-113.
 D. A. Schön, The Reflective Practitioner. How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books. New York, 1983.
 J. Dewey, Experience and Education. Touchstone: New York, 1938/1997.
 J. Dewey, Democracy and Education. Southern Illinois University Press: Carbondale, 1916/1985.
 P. Freire, Pedagogy Of The Oppressed. Penguin Books: London, 1970/1996.
 A. C. Baker, P. J. Jensen, and D. Kolb, "Conversation as Experiential Learning. Management Learning". Vol. 36, no 4, pp 411-427, 2005.
 J. Lave and E. Wenger, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Paolo Alto, CA: Institute for Research on Learning, 1991.
 B. Rogoff, "Developing understanding of the ideas of communities of learners". Mind, Culture and Activity, Vol 1, pp 209-229, 1994.
 D. A. Kolb, Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice Hall: New Jersey, 1984.
 D. Boud, R. Cohen, and D. Walker (eds.), Using Experience for Learning. Buckingham, England: Society for Research into Higher education and Open Learning Press, 1993.
 R. Miettinen and S. Peisa, "Integrating School-based Learning with the Study of Change in Working Life: the alternative enterprise method". Journal of Education and Work, Vol 5, No.3, pp 303-319, 2002.
 J. Xu, "Developing a Taxonomy of Characteristics and Features of Learning Systems and Internetgaming Environments". Report Air Force Research Laboratory Human Effectiveness Directorate Warfighter Readiness Research Division, 2006.
 P. Herbst, "Maps of Knowledge and the Design of Educational Organizations". Nordisk Forum, Vol.6, No. 3, pp.171-188, 1971.
 H. Beinum, C. Faucheux, and R. van der Vlist, "Reflection on the Epigenetic Significance of Action Research," in Beyond Theory, S. Toulmin and B. Gustavsen, Eds. John Benjamins: Amsterdam, 1996, pp 179-202.
 J. Burke, "Expertise, Jurisdiction, and Legitimacy of the Military Profession," in The Future of the Army Profession, D. M. Snider and L. J. Matthews, Eds. McGraw- Hill: New York, 2005, pp 39-60.
 A. Abbot, The System of Professions. An Essay on the Division of labour. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, 1988.
 E. Freidson, Professionalism. The Third Logic. Blackwell: Oxford, 2001.
 ├ÿ. P. P├Ñlshaugen, "The Use of Words: Improvising Enterprises by Improving their Conversations," in Handbook of Action Research, P. Reason and H. Bradbury, Eds. Sage: London, 2001, pp 209-219.
 S. Toulmin, and B. Gustavsen, Eds. Beyond Theory. John Benjamins: Amsterdam, 1996.
 K. E. Weick, "Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems". ASQ, Vol. 21, 1976.
 M. Fullan, The New Meaning of Educational Change. Teacher College Press: New York, 2001.
 P. G. Herbst, Alternativ til hierarkisk organisasjon. Tanum Norli. Oslo, 1977.
 I. Goodson, The Making of Curriculum. The Falmer Press: London, 1998.
 L. Stenhouse, An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. Heinemann Educational: Oxford, 1975.
 F. Gravem, Internal Note on the Pedagogical Approach at the Military Academy. Oslo, 1993.
 The GESI simulator system. www.cae.com.
 I. L. Janis, Groupthink. Houghton Mifflin Company. Boston, 1982.
 C. Argyris, Bryt forsvarsrutinene: Hvordan lette organisasjonsl├ªring. Oslo. Universitetsforlaget, Prentice Hall International, 1990.
 C. Argyris and D. A. Sch├©n, Organizational Learning, a Theory of Action Perspective. Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley, 1978.
 C. Argyris and D. A. Sch├©n, Organizational learning II. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1996.
 B. P. McCoy, The passion of command: The moral imperative of leadership. Marine Corps Association, 2007.
 D. M. Snider and L. J. Matthews (eds.), The Future of the Army Profession. McGraw- Hill. New York, 2005.
 D. A. Schön, Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 1987.
 J. Dewey, How We Think. New York. Dover, 1910/1997.
 B. Gustavsen, "Making Knowledge Actionable. From theoretical centralism to distributive constructivism". Concepts and Transformation. Vol 9, no 2, pp 147-180, 2004.
 B. Gustavsen, Dialogue and Development. Theory of communication, action research and the restructuring of working life. Van Gorcum: Assen Maastricth, 1992.
 ├ÿ. P. P├Ñlshaugen, The End of Organization Theory. John Benjamins: Amsterdam, 1998.
 J. Shotter, Conversational Realities. Sage. London, 2002.