Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30184
Effect of Teaching Games for Understanding Approach on Students- Cognitive Learning Outcome

Authors: Malathi Balakrishnan, Shabeshan Rengasamy, Mohd Salleh Aman

Abstract:

The study investigated the effects of Teaching Games for Understanding approach on students ‘cognitive learning outcome. The study was a quasi-experimental non-equivalent pretest-posttest control group design whereby 10 year old primary school students (n=72) were randomly assigned to an experimental and a control group. The experimental group students were exposed with TGfU approach and the control group with the Traditional Skill approach of handball game. Game Performance Assessment Instrument (GPAI) was used to measure students' tactical understanding and decision making in 3 versus 3 handball game situations. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to analyze the data. The results reveal that there was a significant difference between the TGfU approach group and the traditional skill approach group students on post test score (F (1, 69) = 248.83, p < .05). The findings of this study suggested the importance of TGfU approach to improve primary students’ tactical understanding and decision making in handball game.

Keywords: Constructivism, learning outcome, tactical understanding, and Teaching Game for Understanding (TGfU)

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1074671

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 3960

References:


[1] Darst, P. W., & Pangrazi, R. P. (2006). Dynamic physical education for secondary school students (5th. ed). SanFrancisco, CA: Pearson Education.
[2] Wuest, P. A., & Butcher, C. A (2006). Foundation of Physical Education and Sport. 15thUSA : McGraw Hill.
[3] Bunker, B., & Thorpe, R. (1982). A model for teaching games in secondary schools. Bulletin of Physical Education, 18, 5-8.
[4] Butler, J., & McCahan, B. J. (2005). Teaching games for understanding as a curriculum model. In L. Griffin & J. Butler (Eds), Teaching games for understanding: Theory, research and practice (pp. 33-35). Windsor: Human Kinetics.
[5] Kirk, D., & MacDonald, D. (1998). Situation learning in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 17, 376-387.
[6] Rovegno, I., & Dolly, J. P. (2006). Constructivism perspectives on learning. In D. Kirk, D. Mcdonald, & M. O-Sullivan (Eds.), Handbook of Physical Education (pp.242-261). London: Sage.
[7] Webb. P., & Pearson, P. (2008). An integrated approach to Teaching Games For Understanding. A paper presented at 1st AsiaPacific Sport in Education Conference, Adelaide, Australia. Journal of Health, Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 67(1), 28-33.
[8] Mitchell, S. A. (2005). Teaching and learning games at the elementary level. In L. Griffin & J. Butler (Eds.), Teaching games for understanding: Theory, research and practice (pp. 55-70). Champaign. IL: Human Kinetics.
[9] Werner, P., Thorpe, R., & Bunker, D. (1996). Teaching games for understanding: Evolution of a model. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 67(1), 28-33.
[10] Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., Button, C., Shuttleworth, R., Renshaw, I., & Araujo, D. (2007). The role of nonlinear pedagogy in Physical Education. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), pp. 251-278.
[11] Bunker, D., & Thorpe, R. (1986b). From theory to practice. In R. Thorpe, D. Bunker, & L. Almond (Eds.), Rethinking games teaching pp. 11-14. Loughborough UK: University of Technology.
[12] Nevett, M., Rovegno, I., Barbiaz, M., & McCaughtry, N. (2001). Changes in basic tactics and motor skills in an invasion-type game after a 12-lesson unit of instruction. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 20, 352-369.
[13] Turner, A. P., & Martinek, T. J. (1992). A comparative analysis of two models for teaching games. International Journal of Physical Education, 29, 15-31.
[14] Hopper, T. (2002). Teaching games for understanding. The importance of student emphasis over content emphasis. Journal of Physical Education Recreation and Dance, 73(7), 44-48.
[15] Thorpe, R. D., & Bunker, D. J. (1997). A changing focus in games teaching. In. L. Almond (Ed.), Physical Education in school (pp. 50-80). London: Kogan Page.
[16] Mandigo, J., Buttler, J., & Hopper, T. (2007). What is Teaching Games for Understanding? A Canadian perspective. Physical and Health Education, 14-20.
[17] Kirk, D. (2005a). Future prospects for teaching games for understanding and delight of Human activity. In L. Griffin & J. Butler (Eds.), Teaching games for understanding: Theory, research and practice (pp. 213-226). Windsor: Human Kinetics.
[18] De Vries, L. A. (2008). Overview of recent innovative practices in physical education and sports in Asia. In Innovative Practices in Physical Education and Sports in Asia (pp. 1-21). Bangkok, Thailand: UNESCO.
[19] Salleh, A. R. (1997). The attitudes towards physical education of students from different ethnic groups at secondary school level in Malaysia. PhD. thesis, University of Manchester, England.
[20] Rengasamy, S. (2006). The current status of teaching cardiovascular endurance among Malaysian school children: Theory and practice. Masalah Pendidikan, 29, 91-101.
[21] Sanmuga. N. (2008). The effects and sustainability of training programmers- using Teaching Games for Understanding (TGFU) with different teaching style on students with varying hockey skill levels. A paper presented at 1st Asia Pacific Sport in Education Conference, Adelaide, Australia.
[22] Wee, E. H. (2001). Attitude of Physical Education teachers towards Physical Education and implementation of Physical Education program in secondary school. Unpublished PhD. Thesis, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.
[23] Griffin, L., Mitchell, S. A., & Oslin, J. L. (1997). Teaching sports concepts and skill: A tactical games approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
[24] Capel, S. (1991). Teaching games as an interactive activity. International Journal of Physical Education, 27(2), 6-9.
[25] Rovegno, I., Nevett, M., & Babiaz, M. (2001). Learning and teaching invasion game tactics in 4th grade: Instructional and theoretical perspective. Journal of Teaching Physical Education, 20(4), 341-351.
[26] Tallir, I. B., Mush, E., Lannoo, K., & Voorde, J.V. (2003). Validation of video-based instruments for the assessment of game performance in handball and soccer. Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference, Teaching Sport and Physical Education for Understanding. University of Melbourne.