AI-Based Technologies in International Arbitration: An Exploratory Study on the Practicability of Applying AI Tools on International Arbitration

Authors: Annabelle Ogochukwu Onyefulu-Kingston

Abstract:

One of the major purposes of artificial intelligence (AI) today is to evaluate and analyse millions of micro and macro data in order to determine what is relevant in a particular case and proffer it in an adequate manner. Microdata, as far as it relates to AI in international arbitration, is the millions of key issues specifically mentioned by either one or both parties or by their counsels, arbitrators, or arbitral tribunals in arbitral proceedings. This can be qualifications of expert witness and admissibility of evidence, amongst others. Macro data, on the other hand, refer to data derived from the resolution of the dispute and, consequently, the final and binding award. A notable example of this includes the rationale of the award and specific and general damages awarded, amongst others. This paper aims to critically evaluate and analyses the possibility of technological inclusion in international arbitration. This research will be imploring the qualitative method by evaluating existing literature on the consequence of applying AI to both micro and macro data in international arbitration, and how this can be of assistance to parties, counsels, and arbitrators.

Keywords: AI-based technologies, algorithms, arbitrators, international arbitration.

References:

[1] I. Bantekas, ‘An Introduction to International Arbitration’ (1st edn, Cambridge University Press, 2015), 114.
[2] A.S Márquez, 'Can Artificial Intelligence be used to appoint Arbitrators? Practical and legal implications of the use of Artificial Intelligence in the appointment of arbitrators in International Commercial Arbitration' (2020) 1VAAJ 249-272
[3] M. Moses, 'The Principles and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration'(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 116.
[4] D. J. Hushka, “How Nice to See You Again: The Repetitive Use of Arbitrators and the Risk of Evident” (2013) 5Arbitration Law Review on Arbitration and Mediation 325
[5] S. Puig and A. Strezhnev, “Affiliation Bias in Arbitration: An Experimental Approach” (2017)46 JLS 371-398.
[6] C. Rogers, “Transparency in Arbitration Selection” (2015) Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration
[7] White & Case, International Arbitration Survey: The Evolution of International Arbitration (2018), 21
[8] London Court of International Arbitration, ‘2018 Annual Casework Report’, (2018) See http://ica.org/News/2018-annual-casework-report accessed on 28th November 2023.
[9] Stockholm Chamber of Commerce Statistics, ‘2019 Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce Report’ (2019), see http://sccinstitute.com/statistics accessed on 28th November 2023.
[10] C. Dolinar-Hikawa, 'Beyond the Pale: A Proposal to Promote Ethnic Diversity among International Arbitrators' (2015) 4 TDMJ 12.
[11] See generally, GAR available at http://globalarbitrationreview.com/arbitrator-research-tool accessed on 28th November 2023
[12] C. A. Rogers, 'The Key to Unlocking the Arbitrator Diversity Paradox Arbitrator Intelligence' (Kluwer Arbitration, 2017).
[13] Catherine Rogers, William Park, ‘Ethics in international Arbitration (2008)32 Arbitration International 3, 545-550.
[14] Gülüm Bayraktaroğlu-Özçelik and BarışÖzçelik, 'Use of AI-Based Technologies in International Commercial Arbitration (2021) 12 EJLT 1.
[15] J. Vincent, ‘AI Program Able to Predict Human Rights Trials with 79 Percent Accuracy’, (The Verge News, US 2016),
[16] N. Aletras, D. Tsarapatsanis, D. Preotiuc-Pietro, and L. Vasileios, ‘Predicting Judicial Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: A Natural Language Processing Perspective’ (2016) 93 Peer J Computer Science, 1-19
[17] A. Martin, K. Quinn, T. Ruger, P. Kim, ‘Competing Approaches to Predicting Supreme Court Decision Making’ (2004) 2 PERSP. PoL'Y761-7.
[18] D. M. Katz, M. J Bommarito II, J. Blackman ‘Predicting the Behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States: A General Approach’. (2014) 1407 ARXIV 6333
[19] K. Paisley, E. Sussman, 'Artificial Intelligence Challenges and Opportunities for International Arbitration' (2018) 11 NYSBA 1, 35-40.
[20] ICC Expert report can be found in Arbitration International Vol. 11 No.3 (1995) pp 273-282.
[21] Dolling-Baker v Merrett (1990) 2 ALL ER 890
[22] Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Ministry of Energy and Resources (1995) CLR 10. This decision can be found in Arbitration International, Vol.11 No.3 (12995), pp235-264.
[23] K. Tashiro, ‘Quest for Rational and Proper Method for Publication of Arbitral Awards’ (1992) 9 J Int’l Arb 97.
[24] Article 32 UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules.
[25] J. Kwan, J. Ng’ Brigitte Kiu, 'The Use of Artificial Intelligence in International Arbitration: Where are we right now?' (2019) 1 IALR.
[26] State v Loomis (2016) 881 N.W.2d 749
[27] Online Dispute Resolution’ available at accessed 10th December, 2023.
[28] H. Eidenmüller, F. Varesis, ‘What is an Arbitration? Artificial Intelligence and the Vanishing Human Arbitrator’ (2020) SSRN e journal 1-50
[29] ArbiLex, see < https://www.arbilex.co/> accessed on 15th March 2023
[30] Ravel Law - Products and Technology, see https://home.ravellaw.com/products-and-technology accessed on 15th March 2023
[31] Solomonic Litigation Analytics, see https://www.solomonic.co.uk/overview accessed on 15th March 2023
[32] F. Daso, 'ArbiLex, A Harvard Law School Legal Tech Startup, Uses Al to Settle Arbitrations', (Forbes News, 2020) available at https://www.forbes.com/sites/frederickdaso/2020/02/04/arbilex-a-harvard-lawschool-legal-tech-startup-uses-ai-to-settle arbitrations/#4fc587da52c5 accessed on 15th March 2023.
[33] S. Lohr, ' AI is Doing Legal Work But It Won’t Replace Lawyers, Yet' (New York Times, 2017) available at A.I. Is Doing Legal Work. But It Won’t Replace Lawyers, Yet. - The New York Times (nytimes.com) accessed on 19th December, 2023.
[34] D. C. Weiss, ‘Meet Ross, the World’s first artificially intelligent attorney’ (2015) ABAJ
[35] Christine Sim, ‘Will Artificial Intelligence take over Arbitration?’ (2018) 13 Asian Journal of Intl Arbitration 1, 1-14
[36] eBRAM International Online Dispute Resolution Centre Limited available at eBRAM International Online Dispute Resolution Centre Limited accessed 22nd November 2023.
[37] See generally, Legislative Council (of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China) Panel on Administration of Justice and Legal Services (2019) available at Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region - Home (legco.gov.hk) accessed on 19th December, 2023.
[38] Kira System available at Machine Learning Contract Search, Review and Analysis Software | Kira Systems accessed on 22nd November 2023.
[39] American Arbitration Association; International Centre for Dispute Resolution Clause Builder tool available at AAA-ICDR Clause Drafting | ADR.org accessed on 22nd November, 2023
[40] Section 137 Indian Evidence Act.
[41] A.J. Schmitz, ‘Expanding Access to Remedies through E-Court Initiatives’ (2019) 67 Buffalo Law Review1: 89-163.
[42] ICC and Commission on Arbitration and ADR report on Leveraging technology for fair, effective and efficient international Arbitration Proceedings (2021) available at https://iccwbo.org/content/uploads/sites/3/2022/02/icc-arbitration-and-adr-commission-report-on-leveraging-technology-for-fair-effective-and-efficient-international-arbitration-proceedings.pdf accessed on 11th March 2023
[43] See generally, ICC Commission Report (2021) available at < https://iccwbo.org/content/uploads/sites/3/2020/12/icc-virtual-and-hybrid-hearing-solutions.pdf> accessed on 11th March 2023
[44] See generally, X.Ai, available at < https://x.ai/> accessed on 11th March 2023
[45] Rikhil Raju, 'Machine Learning Infrastructure at x.ai' (Prosyscom tech news, 2019)
[46] J. Armour, R. Parnham& M. Sako, ‘Augmented Lawyering’ European Corporate Governance Institute Law Working paper 558/2020 available at Augmented Lawyering by John Armour, Richard Parnham, Mari Sako SSRN accessed on 19th December, 2023.
[47] Contract Management & Digitization, EBREVIA, see https://ebrevia.com/contract-management-digitization accessed on 15th March 2023
[48] DISCO, available at < https://www.csdisco.com/disco-ai> accessed on 15th March 2023
[49] Meet Case Assist, Case point, see https://www.casepoint.com/ediscovery/features/artificial-intelligence/ accessed on 15th March 2023
[50] T. Snider, S. Dilevka & C. Aknouche, 'Artificial Intelligence and International Arbitration: Going Beyond E-Mail, Al Tamimi Company' (Al Tamimi & Co News, Dubai 2018), See https://ww.tamimi.com/law-update-articles/artificial-intelligence-and-international-arbitration-going-beyond-e-mail/ Accessed On 15th March 2023.
[51] Ajay Agrawal, Joshua Gans, and Avi Goldfarb, 'Prediction Machines: The Simple Economics of Artificial Intelligence'(Harvard University Press, 2018) 272
[52] M. Megal, K. Limond, and A. Calthrop, ‘Artificial Intelligence in Arbitration: Evidentiary Issues and Prospects’ (2023) available at Artificial Intelligence in Arbitration: Evidentiary Issues and Prospects - Global Arbitration Review
[53] J Gesley, and V. Fritz, ‘Artificial “Judges”? - Thoughts on AI in Arbitration Law’ (2021) available at Artificial “Judges”? – Thoughts on AI in Arbitration Law | In Custodia Legis (loc.gov)
[54] A. O. Onyefulu, ‘Artificial Intelligence in International Arbitration: A Step Too Far?’ (2023) 89 IJAMDS 1, 56-77
[55] L. Maddison, ‘Samsung Worker Made a Major Error Using ChatGPT’ (Tech radar news, 2023) available at Samsung workers made a major error by using ChatGPT | TechRadar
[56] J. Choong, V. Sinha, S. Klot, and O. Andre, ‘Data Protection and Cybersecurity in International Arbitration Remain in the Spotlight’ (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer News, 2023) available at Data Protection and Cybersecurity in International Arbitration remain in the spotlight | Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
[57] ICCA-NYC Bar-CPR Protocol on Cybersecurity in International Arbitration (2022 Edition) available at ICCA-reports-no-6-icca-nyc-bar-cpr-protocol-cybersecurity-international-arbitration-2022-edition.pdf (arbitration-icca.org)