Analysis of Noodle Production Process at Yan Hu Food Manufacturing: Basis for Production Improvement
Authors: Rhadinia Tayag-Relanes, Felina C. Young
Abstract:
This study was conducted to analyze the noodle production process at Yan Hu Food Manufacturing for the basis of production improvement. The study utilized the Plan, Do, Check, Act (PDCA) approach and record review in the gathering of data for the calendar year 2019, specifically from August to October, focusing on the noodle products miki, canton, and misua. A causal-comparative research design was employed to establish cause-effect relationships among the variables, using descriptive statistics and correlation to compute the data gathered. The findings indicate that miki, canton, and misua production have distinct cycle times and production outputs in every set of its production processes, as well as varying levels of wastage. The company has not yet established a formal allowable rejection rate for wastage; instead, this paper used a 1% wastage limit. We recommended the following: machines used for each process of the noodle product must be consistently maintained and monitored; an assessment of all the production operators should be conducted by assessing their performance statistically based on the output and the machine performance; a root cause analysis must be conducted to identify solutions to production issues; and, an improved recording system for input and output of the production process of each noodle product should be established to eliminate the poor recording of data.
Keywords: Production, continuous improvement, process, operations, Plan, Do, Check, Act approach.
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 25References:
[1] R. Díaz-Ruiz, M. Costa-Font, and J. M. Gil, “A social perspective on food waste: To what extent consumers are aware of their own food waste,” Envisioning a future without food waste and food poverty, 2015. doi:10.3920/978-90-8686-820-9_18
[2] H. Aydin and C. Aydin, “Investigating consumers’ food waste behaviors: An extended theory of planned behavior of Turkey sample,” Cleaner Waste Systems, vol. 3, p. 100036, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.clwas.2022.100036
[3] G. E. J. Poinern and D. Fawcett, “Food waste valorization: New manufacturing processes for long-term sustainability,” Encyclopedia of Food Security and Sustainability, pp. 429–433, 2019. doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-100596-5.22274-9
[4] M. Thamagasorn and C. Pharino, “An analysis of food waste from a flight catering business for Sustainable Food Waste Management: A case study of halal food production process,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 228, pp. 845–855, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.312
[5] P. Garrone, M. Melacini, A. Perego, and S. Sert, “Reducing Food Waste in food manufacturing companies,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 137, pp. 1076–1085, 2016. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.145
[6] Deshpande, V. A. (January 2017). Application of Plan-Do-Check-Act Cycle for Quality and Productivity Improvement-A Review. Application of Plan-Do-Check-Act Cycle for Quality and Productivity Improvement-A Review.
[7] R. F. Fauzy, E. Febridiko, and H. Hardi Purba, “PDCA, review, institution, Effic Implementasi metode PDCA di Berbagai Organisasi : Kajian Literatur,” Journal of Industrial and Engineering System, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 21–28, 2021. doi:10.31599/jies.v2i1.460
[8] A. Zafari and M. H. Kianmehr, “Application of densification process in Organic Waste Management,” Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 684–691, 2013. doi:10.1177/0734242x13484191
[9] Gelman, A., & Nolan, D. (2017). Linear regression and correlation. Oxford Scholarship Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198785699.003.0005
[10] Two-tailed test. (2022). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071812082.n652
[11] One-way ANOVA: Traditional approach. (2017). Regression, ANOVA, and the General Linear Model: A Statistics Primer, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071939024.n9
[12] Production Data Collection, Exposure and Analysis in a Small Production Enterprise. Production Data Collection, Exposure and Analysis in a Small Production Enterprise, 1178-1182.: ISSN 1330-3651(Print), ISSN 1848-6339 (Online).
[13] Taifa, Ismail & Vhora, Tosifbhai. (2019). Cycle time reduction for productivity improvement in the manufacturing industry. 6. 147-164. 10.22116/jiems.2019.93495.
[14] Omole, A., Soetan, K., Ononogbu, C., Ajasin, F., Olorungbohunmi, T., & Fayenuwo, J. (2015). Utilization of noodle waste as replacement for maize in the diets of growing snails. Journal of Agriculture, Forestry and the Social Sciences, 12(1), 146. doi:10.4314/joafss.v12i1.15.
[15] Sharma, P.,Sharma N. K., &Singh, M., (2015). Process Improvement by Implementation of Kaizen as a Quality Tool within Defined Constraints: A Case Study in Manufacturing Industry. MATTER: International Journal of Science and Technology, 1(1), 182-194.
[16] Perera, A & Navaratne, Senevirathne. (2016). Application of Pareto principle and Fishbone diagram for Waste Management in a Powder Filling Process. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research. 7. 181.
[17] Fishbone diagram for Waste Management in a Powder Filling Process. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 7(11), 181-184. doi:ISSN 2229-5518
[18] Rekha, R. S., Periyasamy, P., & Nallusamy, S. (2017). Manufacturing Enhancement through Reduction of Cycle Time using Different Lean Techniques. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 225, 012282. doi:10.1088/1757-899x/225/1/012282
[19] Niu, M., & Hou, G. G. (2020). Whole grain noodles. Asian Noodle Manufacturing, 95-123. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-812873-2.00006-6
[20] Omeire, Gloria & Umeji, O.F. & Obasi, Nneoma Elechi. (2014). Acceptability of Noodles Produced from Blends of Wheat, Acha and Soybean Composite Flours. Nigerian Food Journal. 32. 31-37. 10.1016/S0189-7241(15)30093-X.
[21] Parwani, V., & Hu, G. (2021). Improving manufacturing supply chain by integrating SMED and production scheduling. Logistics, 5(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics5010004