Mechanical Behavior of Geosynthetics vs. the Combining Effect of Aging, Temperature, and Internal Structure

Authors: Jaime Carpio-García, Elena Blanco-Fernández, Jorge Rodríguez-Hernández, Daniel Castro-Fresno

Abstract:

Geosynthetic mechanical behavior vs temperature or vs aging has been widely studied independently during the last years, both in laboratory and in outdoor conditions. This paper studies this behavior deeper, considering that geosynthetics have to perform adequately at different outdoor temperatures once they have been subjected to a certain degree of aging, and also considering the different geosynthetic structures made of the same material. This combining effect has been not considered so far and it is important to ensure the performance of geosynthetics, especially where high temperatures are expected. In order to fill this gap six commercial geosynthetics with different internal structures made of polypropylene (PP), high density polyethylene (HDPE), bitumen and polyvinyl chloride (PVC), or even a combination of some of them, have been mechanically tested at mild temperature (20 ºC or 23 ºC) and at warm temperature (45 ºC) before and after specific exposition to air at standardized high temperature in order to simulate 25 years of aging due to oxidation. Besides, for 45 ºC tests, a heating system during test for high deformable specimens is proposed. The influence of the combining effect of aging, structure and temperature in the product behavior has been analyzed and discussed, concluding that internal structure is more influential than aging in the mechanical behavior of a geosynthetic versus temperature.

Keywords: Aging, geosynthetics, internal structure, temperature.

References:

[1] W., Kongkitkul, W. Tabsombut, C. Jaturapitakkul and F. Tatsuoka, “Effects on temperature on the rupture strength and elastic stiffness of geogrids,” Geosynthetics International, vol. 19-2, pp. 106-123, 2012.
[2] T. Karademir, “Effect of temperature on tensile strength properties of geosynthetic polymeric base materials,” in Proceedings of the 5th Asian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics, Bangkok, 2012, pp. 715-723.
[3] T. Karademir, and J..D. Frost, “Micro-scale tensile properties of single geotextile polypropylene filaments at elevated temperatures,” Geotextiles and Geomembranes, vol. 42-3, pp. 201-213.
[4] J.C., Hsieh, J.H. Li, C.H. Huang, C.W. Lou and J.-H. Lin, “Statistical analyses for tensile properties of nonwoven geotextiles at different ambient environmental temperatures,” Journal of Industrial Textiles, vol. 47-3, pp. 331-347, 2017.
[5] T. Chantachot, W. Kongkikul, and F. Tatsuoka, “Effects of temperature rise on load-strain-time behavior of geogrids and simulations,” Geosynthetic International, vol. 25-3, pp. 287-303, 2018.
[6] J.L.E., Dias Filho, P.C.D.A. Maia and M.F. Prellwitz. “Influence of drying temperature on punching resistance in geotextile fabrics through wet and dry degradation test,” in Proc. of the 10th Int. Conf. on Geosynthetics, Berlin, 2014, pp. 1829-1835.
[7] R.M. Koerner, Y.H. Halse and A.E. Lord, “Long-term durability and aging of geomembranes,” Geotechnical Special Publications, vol. 26, pp. 106-134, 1990.
[8] Y.G. Hsuan, “Approach to the Study of Durability of Reinforcement Fibers and Yarns in Geosynthetics Clay Liners,” Geotextiles and Geomembranes, vol. 20-1, pp. 63-76, 2002.
[9] W. Mueller, B. Buettgenbach, I. Jakob, and H. Man, “Comparison of the oxidative resistance of various polyolefin geotextiles,” Geotextiles and Geomembranes, vol. 21-5, pp. 289-315, 2003.
[10] W. Mueller, and I. Jakob, “Oxidative resistance of high-density polyethylene geomembranes,” Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 79-1: pp. 161-172, 2003.
[11] R.K., Rowe, and S. Rimal, “Depletion of antioxidants from an HDPE geomembrane in a composite liner,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, vol. 134-1, pp. 68-78, 2008.
[12] H.F., Schröder, M. Munz and M. Böhning, “A new method for testing and evaluating the long-time resistance to oxidation of polyolefinic products,” Polymers and Polymer Composites, vol. 16-1, pp. 71-79, 2008.
[13] N. Touze-Foltz, D. Croissant, F. Farcas, and P. Royet, “Quantification of oxidized bituminous geomembranes ageing through hydraulic testing,” in Proc. of the 9th Int. Conf. on Geosynthetics. Guarujá, Brazil, 2009, pp. 753-756.
[14] Y.G. Hsuan, and M. Li, “Temperature and pressure effects on the oxidation of high-density polyethylene geogrids,” Geotextiles and Geomembranes, vol. 23-1, pp. 55-75, 2005.
[15] E. Norambuena Contreras, “Thermal analysis of geosynthetics used in the rehabilitation of pavements,” Ingeniare, vol. 17-1, pp. 95-100 2009.
[16] E. Aguiar, M. Blanco, F. Castillo, A. Leiro, B. Mateo, A.M. Noval, M. Redón, J.B. Torregrosa and J.G. Zornberg, “Long-term performance of the HDPE geomembrane at the "San Isidro" reservoir,” in Proc. of the 10th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Berlin, 2014, pp. 1701-1708.
[17] M. Blanco, F. Castillo, N. Touze-Foltz, B. Amat and E. Aguiar, “Behavior of an EPDM geomembrane 18 years after its installation in a water reservoir,” International Journal of GEOMATE, vol. 9-1, pp. 1348-1352, 2015
[18] M. Blanco., A.M. Noval, M.A. Crespo, D. Cazzuffi, J.P. Giroud, E. Aguiar, and T. Vara, “Evolution over time of PVC-P geomembrane used at Barlovento reservoir,” in Proceedings of Eurogeo 6. Ljubljana, 2016, pp. 631-641.
[19] S., Lemke, M. Eckl and M. Lonschien, “120-year design lifetime of plastics,” in Proc. of the ITA-AITES World Tunnel Congress 2016, San Francisco, USA, 2016, pp. 1639-1649.
[20] S. Wekesa, “Geosynthetic applications in civil engineering; an introduction to value engineering (VE) technologies,” in Geotextile and Leather Conf. 2013, Nairobi, 2013, https://www.slideshare.net/SirmoiWekesa/geosynthetics-applications-in-civil-engineering-by-sirmoi, accessed May 27th, 2019
[21] “Geosynthetics. Wide-width tensile test,” EN ISO 10319:2015 European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels, 2015.
[22] “Plastics. Determination of tensile properties. Part 3: Test conditions for films and sheets,” EN ISO 527-3:1996 and AC:2002, European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels, 2002.
[23] “Flexible sheet for waterproofing. Part 1: Bitumen sheets for roof waterproofing. Determination of tensile properties,” EN ISO 12311-1:2000, European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels, 2000.
[24] “Geotextile and geotextile-related products. Screening test method for determining the resistance to oxidation,” EN ISO 13438:2005, European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels, 2005.
[25] “Geosynthetic barriers. Screening test method for determining the resistance to oxidation,” EN 14575:2007, European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels, 2007.
[26] A.M. Noval, M. Blanco, F. Farcas, E. Aguiar, F. Castillo, and N. Touze-Foltz, “Long-term performance of EPDM geomembrane in El Boquerón reservoir,” Geosynthetic International, vol. 21-6, pp. 387-398, 2014.