Knowledge Spillovers from Patent Citations: Evidence from Swiss Manufacturing Industry

Authors: Racha Khairallah, Lamia Ben Hamida

Abstract:

Our paper attempts to examine how Swiss manufacturing firms manage to learn from patent citations to improve their innovation performance. We argue that the assessment of these effects needs a detailed analysis of spillovers according to the source of knowledge with respect to formal and informal patent citations made in European and internal search, the horizontal and vertical mechanisms by which knowledge spillovers take place, and the technological characteristics of innovative firms that able them to absorb external knowledge and integrate it in their existing innovation process. We use Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) data and find evidence that knowledge spillovers occur only from horizontal and backward linkages. The importance of these effects depends on the type of citation, in which the references to non-patent literature (informal citations made in European and international searches) have a greater impact. In addition, only firms with high technological capacities benefit from knowledge spillovers from formal and informal citations. Low-technology firms fail to catch up and efficiently learn external knowledge from patent citations.

Keywords: Innovation performance, patent citation, absorptive capacity, knowledge spillover mechanisms.

References:

[1] Blind, K., Edler, J., Frietsch, R., & Schmoch, U. (2006). Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany. Research policy, 35(5), 655-672.
[2] Arundel, A. (2001). The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation. Research policy, 30(4), 611-624.
[3] Pisano, G. P. (1990). The R&D boundaries of the firm: an empirical analysis. Administrative science quarterly, 153-176.
[4] Bascavusoglu-Moreau, E., & Li, Q. C. (2013). Knowledge spillovers and sources of knowledge in the manufacturing sector: literature review and empirical evidence for the UK. Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
[5] Fernandes, C. I., & Ferreira, J. J. (2013). Knowledge spillovers: cooperation between universities and KIBS. R&D Management, 43(5), 461-472.
[6] Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm. Strategic management journal, 17(S2), 109-122.
[7] Leonard, D. (1995). Wellsprings of knowledge (Vol. 16). Boston: Harvard business school press.
[8] Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. the Quarterly journal of Economics, 108(3), 577-598.
[9] Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Fogarty, M. S. (2000). Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: Evidence from a survey of inventors. American Economic Review, 90(2), 215-218.
[10] Harhoff, D., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. (2003). Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Research policy, 32(8), 1343-1363.
[11] Gittelman, M., & Kogut, B. (2003). Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of citation patterns. Management Science, 49(4), 366-382.
[12] Branstetter, L. (2006). Is foreign direct investment a channel of knowledge spillovers? Evidence from Japan's FDI in the United States. Journal of International economics, 68(2), 325-344.
[13] MacGarvie, M. (2005). The determinants of international knowledge diffusion as measured by patent citations. Economics Letters, 87(1), 121-126.
[14] Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of economics, 16-38.
[15] Gambardella, A., Harhoff, D., & Verspagen, B. (2008). The value of European patents. European Management Review, 5(2), 69-84.
[16] Moser, P., Ohmstedt, J., & Rhode, P. W. (2018). Patent citations—an analysis of quality differences and citing practices in hybrid corn. Management Science, 64(4), 1926-1940.
[17] Corsino, M., Mariani, M., & Torrisi, S. (2019). Firm strategic behavior and the measurement of knowledge flows with patent citations. Strategic Management Journal, 40(7), 1040-1069.
[18] Harhoff, D. (1999). Innovation objectives, managerial education and firm performance—an exploratory analysis. In The Dynamics of Innovation: Strategic and Managerial Implications (pp. 133-160). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[19] Ebersberger, B., & Kuckertz, A. (2021). Hop to it! The impact of organization type on innovation response time to the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Business Research, 124, 126-135.
[20] Vieira, C. L. C., Briones‐Peñalver, A. J., & Cegarra‐Navarro, J. G. (2015). Absorptive capacity and technology knowledge: Enhancing relational capital. Knowledge and process management, 22(4), 305-317.
[21] van Aduard de Macedo-Soares, T., Diana, L., Turano, L. M., Esteves, F., & Porto, C. B. (2016). International Alliance Portfolios and Innovation: A Proposal for an Analytical Model Based on Bibliographic and Bibliometric Research. Journal of Global Business & Technology, 12(1).
[22] Aghion, P., & Jaravel, X. (2015). Knowledge spillovers, innovation and growth. The Economic Journal, 125(583), 533-573.
[23] Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: the two faces of R & D. The economic journal, 99(397), 569-596.
[24] Arvanitis, S., Seliger, F., & Woerter, M. (2016). Knowledge Spillovers and their Impact on Innovation Success-A New Approach Using Patent Backward Citations.
[25] Bloom, N., Romer, P. M., Terry, S. J., & Van Reenen, J. (2013). A trapped-factors model of innovation. American Economic Review, 103(3), 208-13.
[26] Peri, G. (2005). Determinants of knowledge flows and their effect on innovation. Review of economics and Statistics, 87(2), 308-322.
[27] Herguera, I., & Lutz, S. (2003). The effect of subsidies to product innovation on international competition. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(5), 465-480.
[28] Lychagin, S., Pinkse, J., Slade, M. E., & Reenen, J. V. (2016). Spillovers in space: does geography matter?. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 64(2), 295-335.
[29] Martelo-Landroguez, S., & Cegarra-Navarro, J. G. (2014). Linking knowledge corridors to customer value through knowledge processes. Journal of knowledge management.
[30] Kwon, S., Youtie, J., Porter, A., & Newman, N. (2022). How does regulatory uncertainty shape the innovation process? Evidence from the case of nanomedicine. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1-41.
[31] Acosta-Prado, J. C., Navarrete, J. F. F., & Tafur-Mendoza, A. A. (2021). Relationship between conditions of knowledge management and innovation capability in new technology-based firms. International Journal of Innovation Management, 25(01), 2150005.
[32] van Raan, A. F. (2017). Patent citations analysis and its value in research evaluation: A review and a new approach to map technology-relevant research. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2(1), 13-50.
[33] Squicciarini, M., Dernis, H., & Criscuolo, C. (2013). Measuring patent quality: Indicators of technological and economic value.
[34] Cassiman, B., Veugelers, R., & Zuniga, P. (2008). In search of performance effects of (in) direct industry science links. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(4), 611-646.
[35] Sorenson, O., & Fleming, L. (2004). Science and the diffusion of knowledge. Research policy, 33(10), 1615-1634.
[36] Branstetter, L. (2005). Exploring the link between academic science and industrial innovation. Annales d'Economie et de Statistique, 119-142.
[37] Haruna, S., Jinji, N., & Zhang, X. (2010). Patent citations, technology diffusion, and international trade: evidence from Asian countries. Journal of Economics and Finance, 34, 365-390.
[38] Glänzel, W., & Meyer, M. (2003). Patents cited in the scientific literature: An exploratory study of'reverse'citation relations. Scientometrics, 58, 415-428.
[39] Cheung, K. Y., & Ping, L. (2004). Spillover effects of FDI on innovation in China: Evidence from the provincial data. China economic review, 15(1), 25-44.
[40] Kokko, A. O. (1994). Foreign direct investment, host country characteristics, and spillovers.
[41] Roach, M., & Cohen, W. M. (2013). Lens or prism? Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows from public research. Management Science, 59(2), 504-525.
[42] Duguet, E., & MacGarvie, M. (2005). How well do patent citations measure flows of technology? Evidence from French innovation surveys. Economics of innovation and new technology, 14(5), 375-393.
[43] Jaffe, A. B. (2000). The US patent system in transition: policy innovation and the innovation process. Research policy, 29(4-5), 531-557.
[44] Albert, M. B., Avery, D., Narin, F., & McAllister, P. (1991). Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents. Research policy, 20(3), 251-259.
[45] Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
[46] Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of management review, 27(2), 185-203.
[47] Todorova, G., & Durisin, B. (2007). Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization. Academy of management review, 32(3), 774-786.
[48] Song, Y., Gnyawali, D. R., Srivastava, M. K., & Asgari, E. (2018). In search of precision in absorptive capacity research: A synthesis of the literature and consolidation of findings. Journal of Management, 44(6), 2343-2374.
[49] Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization science, 13(3), 339-351.
[50] Zheng, S., Zhang, W., & Du, J. (2011). Knowledge‐based dynamic capabilities and innovation in networked environments. Journal of knowledge management.
[51] Caragliu, A., & Nijkamp, P. (2008). The impact of regional absorptive capacity on spatial knowledge spillovers (No. 08-119/3). Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper.
[52] Xia, B. S. (2013). Learning outcomes and knowledge sharing using web-based technologies in finnish forest education from an educational experience point of view. E-Learning and Digital Media, 10(1), 95-106.
[53] Chen, Y. S., Lin, M. J. J., & Chang, C. H. (2009). The positive effects of relationship learning and absorptive capacity on innovation performance and competitive advantage in industrial markets. Industrial marketing management, 38(2), 152-158.
[54] Pai, F. Y., & Hung-Fan, C. (2013). The effects of knowledge sharing and absorption on organizational innovation performance–A dynamic capabilities perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 8, 83.
[55] Xie, X., Zou, H., & Qi, G. (2018). Knowledge absorptive capacity and innovation performance in high-tech companies: A multi-mediating analysis. Journal of business research, 88, 289-297.
[56] Teece, D. J. (1998). Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. California management review, 40(3), 55-79.
[57] Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic management journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
[58] Narayanan, V. K., Colwell, K., & Douglas, F. L. (2009). Building organizational and scientific platforms in the pharmaceutical industry: A process perspective on the development of dynamic capabilities. British Journal of Management, 20, S25-S40.
[59] Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., & Herrera, F. (2019). Innovation practices in emerging economies: Do university partnerships matter?. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44, 615-646.
[60] BFS (2018): Swiss Input-Output table 2014. in https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/en/home/statistics/national-economy/input-output.html
[61] Hovhannisyan, N., & Sedgley, N. (2019). Using panel VAR to analyze international knowledge spillovers. Review of International Economics, 27(5), 1633-1660.
[62] Mansfield, E. (1986). Patents and innovation: an empirical study. Management science, 32(2), 173-181
[63] Guellec, D., & de La Potterie, B. V. P. (2016). Patents as Indicators of Innovation. A Critical Review.in the OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, no. 2016/01, 2016.
[64] Jaffe, A. B., & De Rassenfosse, G. (2019). Patent citation data in social science research: Overview and best practices. Research handbook on the economics of intellectual property law, 20-46.