Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation of Meteorological Model: CALMET
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33026
Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation of Meteorological Model: CALMET

Authors: N. Miklavčič, U. Kugovnik, N. Galkina, P. Ribarič, R. Vončina

Abstract:

Today the need for weather predictions is deeply rooted in the everyday life of people as well as it is in industry. The forecasts influence final decision-making processes in multiple areas from agriculture and prevention of natural disasters to air traffic regulations and solutions on a national level for health, security, and economic problems. Namely in Slovenia, alongside other existing forms of application, weather forecasts are adopted for the prognosis of electrical current transmission through powerlines. Meteorological parameters are one of the key factors which need to be considered in estimations of the reliable supply of electrical energy to consumers. And like for any other measured value, the knowledge about measurement uncertainty is critical also for the secure and reliable supply of energy. The estimation of measurement uncertainty grants us a more accurate interpretation of data, a better quality of the end results, and even a possibility of improvement of weather forecast models.

Keywords: Measurement uncertainty, microscale meteorological model, CALMET meteorological station, orthogonal regression.

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 16

References:


[1] http://www.src.com/
[2] Scire, J.S., and Robe, F.R. "Fine-scale application of CALMET meteorological model to a complex terrain site," paper presented at the Air & Waste Management Association 90th Annual Meeting and Exhibition, 8-13 June 1997, Toronto, Canada.
[3] CALPUFF Modeling System Version 6 User Instructions, April 2011.
[4] https://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/projects/srtmshuttle-radar-topogr
[5] https://www.e-prostor.gov.si/
[6] BIPM, JCGM 100:2008, "Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement," Corrected version 2010.
[7] Keleş, T. "Comparison of Classical Least Squares and Orthogonal Regression in Measurement Error Models," Journal of Educational Sciences, 2018.
[8] CEN TC 264 WG 21. "Test protocol for field validation of B(a)P reference measurement methods," Working Group Document N67.
[9] Report by an EC Working Group on Guidance for the Demonstration of Equivalence, 2010.
[10] Vaisala, "User Guide, Vaisala Weather Transmitter WXT530 Series."
[11] Kipp & Zonen, "Operational Manual, SMP Series Smart Pyranometers."
[12] Calibration sheet no. H31-19450037.
[13] Calibration certificate Kipp & Zonen 019643190529.