Active Learning Strategies to Develop Student Skills in Information Systems for Management

Authors: F. Castro Lopes, S. Fernandes

Abstract:

Active learning strategies are at the center of any change process aimed to improve the development of student skills. This paper aims to analyze the impact of teaching strategies, including problem-based learning (PBL), in the curricular unit of information system for management, based on students’ perceptions of how they contribute to develop the desired learning outcomes of the curricular unit. This course is part of the 1st semester and 3rd year of the graduate degree program in management at a private higher education institution in Portugal. The methodology included an online questionnaire to students (n = 40). Findings from students reveal a positive impact of the teaching strategies used. In general, 35% considered that the strategies implemented in the course contributed to the development of courses’ learning objectives. Students considered PBL as the learning strategy that better contributed to enhance the courses’ learning outcomes. This conclusion brings forward the need for further reflection and discussion on the impact of student feedback on teaching and learning processes.

Keywords: Higher education, active learning strategies, skills development, student assessment.

References:

[1] M. Prince, “Does active learning work? A review of the research,” Journal of Engineering Education. 2004.
[2] R. Felder and R. Brent, “Effective strategies for cooperative learning,” J. Coop. Collab. Coll. Teach., 2001.
[3] R. M. Felder and R. Brent, “Active Learning.” University of West Florida, Pensacola, Florida, 2006.
[4] C. Bonwell, “Active learning : creating excitement in the classroom /,” ASHE-ERIC High. Educ. Rep., 1991.
[5] E. Ribeiro-Silva, C. Amorim, J. L. Aparicio-Herguedas, and P. Batista, “Trends of Active Learning in Higher Education and Students’ Well-Being: A Literature Review,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, Apr. 2022.
[6] B. M. Gaebel, T. Zhang, and L. Bunescu, “Trends 2018: Learning and teaching in the European Higher Education Area,” 2018.
[7] ESG, “Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG),” EURASHE, Brussels, 2015.
[8] B. Smith and J. MacGregor, “Collaborative Learning: A Sourcebook for Higher Education,” and J. M. Goodsell, A., M. Mahler, V. Tinto, B.L.Smith, Ed. PA: National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning and Assessment, 1992, pp. 9–22.
[9] D. W. Johnson, R. T. Johnson, and K. Smith, “The state of cooperative learning in postsecondary and professional settings,” Educational Psychology Review. 2007.
[10] A. Kolmos and E. De Graaff, “Characteristics of Problem-Based Learning*,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., 2003.
[11] A. Kolmos, “Reflections on Project Work and Problem-based Learning,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 141–148, 1996.
[12] D. Gijbels, F. Dochy, P. Van Den Bossche, and M. Segers, “Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis from the angle of assessment,” Review of Educational Research. 2005.
[13] M. A. Albanese and S. Mitchell, “Problem-based learning: A review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues,” Academic Medicine. 1993.
[14] H. G. Schmidt, J. I. Rotgans, and E. H. J. Yew, “The process of problem-based learning: What works and why,” Med. Educ., 2011.
[15] J. A. Colliver, “Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: Research and theory,” Acad. Med., 2000.
[16] R. M. Lima et al., “Ten Years of Project-Based Learning (PBL) in Industrial Engineering and Management at the University of Minho,” in PBL in Engineering Education, A. Guerra, R. Ulseth, and A. Kolmos, Eds. Rotterdam: SensePublishers, 2017, pp. 33–51.
[17] S. Fernandes, Project-Based Learning: implementação no primeiro ano de um curso de Engenharia. UMinho Editora, 2021.
[18] P. Powell and W. Weenk, Project-led engineering education. Utrecht: Lemma, 2003.
[19] A. Guerra, R. Ulseth, and A. Kolmos, PBL in Engineering Education. Rotterdam: SensePublishers, 2017.
[20] S. Freeman et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410–8415, Jun. 2014.
[21] K. A. Johnson, David W.; Johnson, Roger T.; Smith, “Cooperative Learning Returns to College: What Evidence Is There That It Works?,” Change, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 26–35, 1998.
[22] S. Hartikainen, H. Rintala, L. Pylväs, and P. Nokelainen, “The Concept of Active Learning and the Measurement of Learning Outcomes: A Review of Research in Engineering Higher Education,” Educ. Sci., vol. 9, no. 4, p. 276, Nov. 2019.
[23] M. Andrews, M. Prince, C. Finelli, M. Graham, M. Borrego, and J. Husman, “Explanation and Facilitation Strategies Reduce Student Resistance to Active Learning,” Coll. Teach., pp. 1–11, Oct. 2021.
[24] K. Børte, K. Nesje, and S. Lillejord, “Barriers to student active learning in higher education,” Teach. High. Educ., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–19, 2020.
[25] C. J. Finelli et al., “A classroom observation instrument to assess student response to active learning,” in 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings, 2014, pp. 1–4.
[26] F. Castro-Lopes, C. Santos-Pereira, N. Durão, and S. Fernandes, “Students’ perceptions of the use of traditional methods and active learning strategies in the classroom: findings from a case study,” in Proceedings of the PAEE/ALE’2021, International Conference on Active Learning in Engineering Education 13th International Symposium on Project Approaches in Engineering Education (PAEE) 18th Active Learning in Engineering Education Workshop (ALE), 2021, pp. 367–374.