Data Privacy and Safety with Large Language Models

Authors: Ashly Joseph, Jithu Paulose

Abstract:

Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing capabilities, enabling applications such as chatbots, dialogue agents, image, and video generators. Nevertheless, their trainings on extensive datasets comprising personal information poses notable privacy and safety hazards. This study examines methods for addressing these challenges, specifically focusing on approaches to enhance the security of LLM outputs, safeguard user privacy, and adhere to data protection rules. We explore several methods including post-processing detection algorithms, content filtering, reinforcement learning from human and AI inputs, and the difficulties in maintaining a balance between model safety and performance. The study also emphasizes the dangers of unintentional data leakage, privacy issues related to user prompts, and the possibility of data breaches. We highlight the significance of corporate data governance rules and optimal methods for engaging with chatbots. In addition, we analyze the development of data protection frameworks, evaluate the adherence of LLMs to General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and examine privacy legislation in academic and business policies. We demonstrate the difficulties and remedies involved in preserving data privacy and security in the age of sophisticated artificial intelligence by employing case studies and real-life instances. This article seeks to educate stakeholders on practical strategies for improving the security and privacy of LLMs, while also assuring their responsible and ethical implementation.

Keywords: Data privacy, large language models, artificial intelligence, machine learning, cybersecurity, general data protection regulation, data safety.

References:

[1] Gao, M., Hu, X., Ruan, J., Pu, X., & Wan, X. (2024). LLM-based NLG Evaluation: Current Status and Challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01383v2. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.01383
[2] Neel, S., & Chang, P. (2023). Privacy issues in large language models: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.06717. https://arxiv.org/html/2402.00888v1
[3] Jin, H., Wei, W., Wang, X., Zhang, W., & Wu, Y. (2023). Rethinking learning rate tuning in the era of large language models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.08859
[4] N. Kshetri, "Cybercrime and Privacy Threats of Large Language Models" in IT Professional, vol. 25, no. 03, pp. 9-13, 2023. doi: 10.1109/MITP.2023.3275489
[5] Xiaodong Wu; Ran Duan; Jianbing Ni (2024). Unveiling security, privacy, and ethical concerns of ChatGPT. Journal of Information and Intelligence, 2(2), 102-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiixd.2023.10.007
[6] Wankit Yip, Daniel; Esmradi, Aysan; Chan, Chun Fai (2024). A novel evaluation framework for assessing resilience against prompt injection attacks in large language models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.00991
[7] Joseph, A. (2024). 'AI-Driven Cloud Security: Proactive Defense Against Evolving Cyber Threats'. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Open Science Index 209, International Journal of Computer and Information Engineering, 18(5), 261 - 265.
[8] Erfan Shayegani, Md Abdullah Al Mamun, Yu Fu, Pedram Zaree, Yue Dong, Nael Abu-Ghazaleh (2023). Survey of vulnerabilities in large language models revealed by adversarial attacks. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.10844
[9] Gupta, M., Akiri, C., Aryal, K., Parker, E., & Praharaj, L. (2023). From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of generative AI in cybersecurity and privacy. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.00691
[10] Gozalo-Brizuela, R., & Garrido-Merchan, E. C. (2023). ChatGPT is not all you need: A state of the art review of large generative AI models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.04655
[11] Joseph, A. (2023). 'Demystifying Full-Stack Observability: Mastering Visibility, Insight, and Action in the Modern Digital Landscape'. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Open Science Index 200, International Journal of Computer and Information Engineering, 17(8), 485 - 492.
[12] Nasr, M., Carlini, N., Hayase, J., Jagielski, M., Cooper, A. F., Ippolito, D., Choquette-Choo, C. A., Wallace, E., Tramèr, F., & Lee, K. (2023). Scalable extraction of training data from (production) language models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.17035
[13] Chang, Y., Wang, X., Wang, J., Wu, Y., Yang, L., Zhu, K., Chen, H., Yi, X., Wang, C., Wang, Y., Ye, W., Zhang, Y., Chang, Y., Yu, P. S., Yang, Q., & Xie, X. (2023). A survey on evaluation of large language models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.03109
[14] Bowman, S. R. (2023). Eight things to know about large language models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.00612
[15] Joseph, A. (2023). 'A Holistic Framework for Unifying Data Security and Management in Modern Enterprises'. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Open Science Index 202, International Journal of Social and Business Sciences, 17(10), 596 - 603.
[16] Pfau, J., Merrill, W., & Bowman, S. R. (2024). Let's think dot by dot: Hidden computation in transformer language models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.15758
[17] Guo, Z., Jin, R., Liu, C., Huang, Y., Shi, D., Supryadi, Yu, L., Liu, Y., Li, J., Xiong, B., & Xiong, D. (2023). Evaluating large language models: A comprehensive survey. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.19736
[18] Derner, E., & Batistič, K. (2023). Beyond the safeguards: Exploring the security risks of ChatGPT. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.08005
[19] Li, H., Chen, Y., Luo, J., Kang, Y., Zhang, X., Hu, Q., Chan, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Privacy in large language models: Attacks, defenses and future directions. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.10383
[20] Sha, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Prompt stealing attacks against large language models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.12959
[21] M. C. Horowitz, G. C. Allen, E. Saravalle, A. Cho, K. Frederick, and P. Scharre, Artificial intelligence and international security. Center for a New American Security., 2018.
[22] Erich, F. M. A., Amrit, C., & Daneva, M. (2017, June). A qualitative study of DevOps usage in practice. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 29(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.1885
[23] Kumar, A., Nadeem, M., & Shameem, M. (2023, July 12). Machine learning based predictive modeling to effectively implement DevOps practices in software organizations. Automated Software Engineering, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10515-023-00388-8
[24] Sebastian, G. (2023). Privacy and data protection in ChatGPT and other AI chatbots: Strategies for securing user information. Georgia Institute of Technology - School of Public Policy. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4454761
[25] Z. Sha and Y. Zhang, “Prompt stealing attacks against large language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.12959, 2024.
[26] Wu, X., Duan, R., & Ni, J. (2023). Unveiling security, privacy, and ethical concerns of ChatGPT. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.14192
[27] Liu, Y., Deng, G., Li, Y., Wang, K., Wang, Z., Wang, X., Zhang, T., Liu, Y., Wang, H., Zheng, Y., & Liu, Y. (2023). Prompt injection attack against LLM-integrated applications. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.05499