Elements of a Culture of Quality in the Implementation of Quality Assurance Systems of Countries in the European Higher Education Area
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32984
Elements of a Culture of Quality in the Implementation of Quality Assurance Systems of Countries in the European Higher Education Area

Authors: L. Mion

Abstract:

The implementation of quality management systems in higher education in different countries is determined by national regulatory choices and supranational indications (such as the European Standard Guidelines for Quality Assurance). The effective functioning and transformative capacity of these quality management systems largely depend on the organizational context in which they are applied and, more specifically, on the culture of quality developed in single universities or in single countries. The University's concept of quality culture integrates the structural dimension of Quality Assurance (QA) (quality management manuals, process definitions, tools) with the value dimension of an organization (principles, skills, and attitudes). Within the EHEA (European Higher Education Area), countries such as Portugal, the Netherlands, the UK, Norway demonstrate a greater integration of QA principles in the various organizational levels and areas of competence of university institutions or have greater experience in implementation or scientific and political debate on the matter. Therefore, the study, through an integrative literature review, of the quality management systems of these countries, aimed at determining a framework of the culture of quality, helpful in defining the elements which, both in structural-organizational terms and in terms of values and skills and attitudes, have proved to be factors of success in the effective implementation of quality assurance systems in universities and in the countries considered in the research. In order for a QA system to effectively aim for continuous improvement in a complex and dynamic context such as the university one, it must embrace a holistic vision of quality from an integrative perspective, focusing on the objective of transforming the reality being evaluated.

Keywords: Higher Education, quality assurance, quality culture, Portugal, Norway, Netherlands, United Kingdom.

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 18

References:


[1] U.D. Ehlers, “Understanding Quality Culture”, in Quality Assurance in Education, vol 17 vo. 4, 2009, pp. 343-363.
[2] D. Billing, “International comparisons and trends in external quality assurance of higher education: Commonality or diversity?”, Higher Education, vol. 47, No.1, 2004, pp. 113-137, DOI: 10.1023/B:HIGH.0000009804.31230.5e
[3] H.R. Kells, “National Higher Education Evaluation Systems: Methods for Analysis and Some Propositions for the Research and Policy void”, in Higher Education, Volume 38, n.2, 1999, pg 209-232.
[4] L. Mion, “An integrative review on the experiences of integration of quality assurance systems in universities”, in n, 2022, pp. 3549-3559. ISBN: 978-84-09-45476-1 ISSN: 2340-1095 doi: 10.21125/iceri.2022.0868
[5] J. F. Perellon, (2007). Analysing quality assurance in higher education: proposals for a conceptual framework and methodological implications. In Quality Assurance in Higher Education (pp. 155-178). Springer, Dordrecht.
[6] R. Whittemore, K. Knafl, “The integrative review: updated methodology” in Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 52 n.5., 2005, pp. 546-553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
[7] J.C. Van Bruggen, J.P. Scheele, D.F. Westerheijden, “To be continued. Syntheses and trends in follow-up of quality assurance in West European higher education” in European Journal for Education Law and Policy 2, 1998, pp. 155-163.
[8] P. A. M. Maassen, “Quality Assurance in the Netherlands°” in New Directions for Institutional Research, vol. 99, 1998, pp. 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.9902
[9] M. M. H. Frederiks, D. F. Westerheijden, P. J. M.Weusthof, “Effects of Quality Assessment in Dutch Higher Education” in European Journal of Education, 29(2), 1994, pp. 181–199. https://doi.org/10.2307/1561640
[10] K. Dittrich, M. Frederiks, M. Luwel, “The Implementation of “Bologna” in Flanders and the Netherlands” in European Journal of Education, 39(3), 2004, pp. 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2004.00185.x
[11] M. Jeliazkova, D.F. Westerheijden, “The Netherlands: A Leader in Quality Assurance Follows the Accreditation Trend”. In: Schwarz, S., Westerheijden, D.F. (eds) Accreditation and Evaluation in the European Higher Education Area. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 5. 2004, Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2797-0_15
[12] L. Harvey, D. Green, “Defining Quality” in Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, vo.18 n.1, 1993, pp.9-34.
[13] P. Greatrix, “Quality assurance into the 21st century: Command and control or enlightened accountability?” in Perspectives: Policy & Practice in Higher Education, vol. 5 n.1, 2001, pp.12-16. doi: 10.1080/13603100150505208
[14] R. Brown, “The new UK quality framework” in Higher Education Quarterly vol. 54, 2000, pp. 323–342.
[15] Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals of the Universities of the UK/Higher Education Funding Council for England, Joint Planning Group for Quality Assurance in Higher Education, 1996.
[16] C. Cochrane, “Assessing the quality of higher education in the United Kingdom: Librarianship and information management as a case-study” in Education for Information, vol. 22, 2004,.3–4, 2004163–185. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-223-402
[17] C. Clemet, “The Bologna Process from a Norwegian Perspective—towards a European Higher Education Area”, 1–14. 2004 Retrieved December 16, 2007 from http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/Docs/Norway/04101Fact_Sheet_Bologna-Process.pdf.
[18] D.F. Westerheijden, V. Hulpiau, and K. Waeytens. “From Design and Implementation to Impact of Quality Assurance: An Overview of Some Studies into What Impacts Improvement.” In Tertiary Education and Management vol.13 n.4, 2007, pp. 295–312.
[19] O. Tavares, C. Sin, A. Amaral “Internal quality assurance systems in Portugal: what their strengths and weaknesses reveal” in Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2015. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1064515
[20] A. Amaral, M. J. Rosa, M. Fonseca.“The Portuguese Case: Can Institutions Move to Quality Enhancement?” In Enhancing Quality in Higher Education. International Perspectives, edited by R. Land and G. Gordon, 2013, pp.141–152. London: Routledge.
[21] D. Van Damme, (2000). “European approaches to quality assurance: models, characteristics and challenges” in South African journal of higher education, Vol.14 (2), 2000, p.10-19.
[22] D. Green, “What is quality in higher education? Concepts, politcy and practice” in Open University Press and Society for Research into Higher Education, Buckingham, 1994, 3-30.
[23] ENQA, Report by an ENQA review panel Quality Assurance of Higher Education in Portugal - An Assessment of the Existing System and Recommendations for a Future System, November 2006, European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education 2006, Helsinki
[24] L.T. Drennan, “Quality assessment and the tension between teaching and research” in Quality in Higher Education vol.7, 2001, pp. 167–178
[25] L. Bornmann, S. Mittag, H.-D. Daniel. “Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Meta-Evaluation of Multi-Stage Evaluation Procedures in Germany” in Education, 52(4),2006, pp. 687–709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s
[26] T. S. Durrani, “Institutional accreditation United Kingdom model - Scottish variation” in 2011 International Workshop on Institutional and Programme Accreditation: Connections and Opportunities, 2011, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/IWIPA.2011.6221143
[27] R. Brown, R. Quality Assurance in Higher Education: the UK experience since 1992. 2004, London: RoutledgeFalmer.
[28] K. Serrano-Velarde, B. Stensaker, “Bologna — Realising Old or New Ideals of Quality?” in Higher Education Policy, vol.23, 2010, pp. 213-226.
[29] L. Bornmann, H.-D. Daniel, “Potential sources of bias in Research Fellowship Assessments: effects of university prestige and field of study”in Research Evaluation, Vol.15, n.3, 2006, pp.209-219 DOI: 10.3152/147154406781775850
[30] S. Cardoso, M. J. Rosa, P. Videira, A. Amaral, “Internal quality assurance systems: “tailor made” or “one size fits all” implementation?” in Quality Assurance in Education, vol.25 n.3, 2017, pp. 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-03-2017-0007
[31] H. Salvesen, “The Quality Assurance System for Higher Education in Norway - with Particular Reference to the Library Services” in LIBER Quarterly, vol.16 n.3–4, 2006. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.7862
[32] D. F. Westerheijden, “Peers, Performance and Power.” In L. Goedegebuure, P. Maassen, and D.Westerheijden (eds.), Peer Review and Performance Indicators: Quality Assessment in British and Dutch Higher Education. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Lemma, 1990.
[33] G. Grendstad, P. Selle, “Cultural Theory and the New Institutionalism” in Journal of Theoretical Politics, vol 7, 1995, 27 - 5.
[34] A. Hoecht, “Quality assurance in UK higher education: Issues of trust, control, professional autonomy and accountability” in Higher Education, vol.51 n.4, 2006, pp.541–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-2533-2
[35] T. Loukkola, T. Zhang, Examining quality culture: Part 1-Quality assurance processes in higher education institutions. 2010, Brussels: European University Association.
[36] O. Tavares, C. Sin, A. Amaral “Internal quality assurance systems in Portugal: what their strengths and weaknesses reveal” in Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2015, DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1064515
[37] J. Kohoutek, u.a. “The European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area in Portugal and the Czech Republic: Between the Worlds of Neglect and Dead Letters?” in Higher education policy, vol.31 n.2, 2018, pp.201–224. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-017-0050-z
[38] J. Reynolds, M. Saunders, “Teacher responses to curriculum policy: Beyond the ‘delivery metaphor’” In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers’ thinking (pp. 195–214). 1987, Cassell.
[39] P. Trowler, Higher education policy and institutional change, pp. 142-163, 2002, Open University.
[40] L. Matei, A. Curaj, Building an Integrated Higher Education System in Europe: Romania’s Commitments in the European Higher Education Area and Their Implementation at National Level. 2014, New York: Central European University Press.
[41] A. I. Vroeijenstijn, “Improvement and Accountability: Navigating between Scylla and Charybdis. Guide for External Quality Assessment” in Higher Education. Higher Education Policy Series 30. Taylor and Francis, 1995, Bristol.
[42] NVAO, “The Quality Assurance System in The Netherlands”, 2018.
[43] O. Dekkers “Towards a development oriented approach to programme assessment: a Dutch case study” in Advancing quality in European higher education: celebrating 20 years of ENQA, European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education AISBL 2020, Brussel - ISBN 978-952-5539-94-3
[44] T. Vroeijenstijn, H. Acherman, “Control-Oriented versus Improvement-Oriented Quality Assessment”, in: L. C. J. Goedegebuure, P. A. M. Maassen & D. F. Westerheijden (Eds): Peer Review and Performance Indicators, 1990, Culemborg, Lemma.
[45] W. Wijnen, “Accreditation in the Netherlands: an improvement of external quality assessment?” In Alessandro Cavalli (Ed.) Quality Assessment for Higher Education in Europe. 2007, London: Portland Press.
[46] L. Harvey, P. T. Knight, Transforming Higher Education. Buckingham, England: SRHE/Open University Press, 1996.