Methodology to Assess the Circularity of Industrial Processes

Authors: B. F. Oliveira, T. I. Gonçalves, M. M. Sousa, S. M. Pimenta, O. F. Ramalho, J. B. Cruz, F. V. Barbosa

Abstract:

The EU Circular Economy action plan, launched in 2020, is one of the major initiatives to promote the transition into a more sustainable industry. The circular economy is a popular concept used by many companies nowadays. Some industries are better forwarded to this reality than others, and the tannery industry is a sector that needs more attention due to its strong environmental impact caused by its dimension, intensive resources consumption, lack of recyclability, and second use of its products, as well as the industrial effluents generated by the manufacturing processes. For these reasons, the zero-waste goal and the European objectives are further being achieved. In this context, a need arises to provide an effective methodology that allows to determine the level of circularity of tannery companies. Regarding the complexity of the circular economy concept, few factories have a specialist in sustainability to assess the company’s circularity or have the ability to implement circular strategies that could benefit the manufacturing processes. Although there are several methodologies to assess circularity in specific industrial sectors, there is not an easy go-to methodology applied in factories aiming for cleaner production. Therefore, a straightforward methodology to assess the level of circularity, in this case of a tannery industry, is presented and discussed in this work, allowing any company to measure the impact of its activities. The methodology developed consists in calculating the Overall Circular Index (OCI) by evaluating the circularity of four key areas -energy, material, economy and social- in a specific factory. The index is a value between 0 and 1, where 0 means a linear economy, and 1 is a complete circular economy. Each key area has a sub-index, obtained through key performance indicators (KPIs) regarding each theme, and the OCI reflects the average of the four sub-indexes. Some fieldwork in the appointed company was required in order to obtain all the necessary data. By having separate sub-indexes, one can observe which areas are more linear than others. Thus, it is possible to work on the most critical areas by implementing strategies to increase the OCI. After these strategies are implemented, the OCI is recalculated to check the improvements made and any other changes in the remaining sub-indexes. As such, the methodology in discussion works through continuous improvement, constantly reevaluating and improving the circularity of the factory. The methodology is also flexible enough to be implemented in any industrial sector by adapting the KPIs. This methodology was implemented in a selected Portuguese small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) tannery industry and proved to be a relevant tool to measure the circularity level of the factory. It was witnessed that it is easier for non-specialists to evaluate circularity and identify possible solutions to increase its value, as well as learn how one action can impact their environment. In the end, energetic and environmental inefficiencies were identified and corrected, increasing the sustainability and circularity of the company. Through this work, important contributions were provided, helping the Portuguese SMEs to achieve the European and UN 2030 sustainable goals.

Keywords: Circular economy, circularity index, sustainability, tannery industry, zero-waste.

References:

[1] P. Morseletto, “Restorative and regenerative: Exploring the concepts in the circular economy,” J Ind Ecol, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 763–773, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1111/jiec.12987.
[2] European Commission, “Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - A new Circular Economy Action,” 2020. (Online). Available: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-consumption-production/
[3] J. Pinyol Alberich, M. Pansera, and S. Hartley, “Understanding the EU’s circular economy policies through futures of circularity,” J Clean Prod, vol. 385, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135723.
[4] T. Bauwens, M. Hekkert, and J. Kirchherr, “Circular futures: What Will They Look Like?,” Ecological Economics, vol. 175, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106703.
[5] European Commission, “Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - EU Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles,” 2022. (Online). Available: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat
[6] J. Goddin et al., “Ellen MacArthur Foundation Project Team (in alphabetical order),” 2019. (Online). Available: http://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/circularity-indicators/.
[7] P. Dräger, P. Letmathe, L. Reinhart, and F. Robineck, “Measuring circularity: evaluation of the circularity of construction products using the ÖKOBAUDAT database,” Environ Sci Eur, vol. 34, no. 1, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1186/s12302-022-00589-0.
[8] J. Widheden and E. Ringstrsm, “Life Cycle Assessment.”, 2007, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-51664-0.50021-8.
[9] M. Nardo, M. Saisana, A. Saltelli, S. Tarantola, A. Hoffman, and E. Giovannini, “OECD Statistics Working Papers 2005/03 Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide,” 2005, doi: 10.1787/533411815016.
[10] S. G. Azevedo, R. Godina, and J. C. de O. Matias, “Proposal of a sustainable circular index for manufacturing companies,” Resources, vol. 6, no. 4, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.3390/resources6040063.
[11] J. A. Garza-Reyes, A. Salomé Valls, S. Peter Nadeem, A. Anosike, and V. Kumar, “A circularity measurement toolkit for manufacturing SMEs,” Int J Prod Res, vol. 57, no. 23, pp. 7319–7343, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1559961.
[12] D. Krajnc and P. Glavič, “A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development,” Resour Conserv Recycl, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 189–208, Jan. 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.06.002.
[13] A. A. Ahmed, M. A. Nazzal, B. M. Darras, and I. M. Deiab, “A comprehensive multi-level circular economy assessment framework,” Sustain Prod Consum, vol. 32, pp. 700–717, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2022.05.025.
[14] Ellen Macarthur Foundation and Granta Design, “Circularity Indicators - An Approach to Measuring Circularity,” May 2015.
[15] A. Colloricchio, C. P. Siguenza, F. Sollitto, and Y. Ahmed, “The Circularity GAP Report 2023,” 2023.
[16] A. González, C. Sendra, A. Herena, M. Rosquillas, and D. Vaz, “Methodology to assess the circularity in building construction and refurbishment activities,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling Advances, vol. 12, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.rcradv.2021.200051.
[17] C. M. Angioletti, M. Despeisse, and R. Rocca, “Product circularity assessment methodology,” in IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, Springer New York LLC, 2017, pp. 411–418. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-66926-7_47.
[18] Global Sustainability Standards Board, “Consolidated Set of the GRI Standards,” 2024.
[19] E. Giama and A. M. Papadopoulos, “Benchmarking carbon footprint and circularity in production processes: The case of stonewool and extruded polysterene,” J Clean Prod, vol. 257, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120559.
[20] S. Karayılan, Ö. Yılmaz, Ç. Uysal, and S. Naneci, “Prospective evaluation of circular economy practices within plastic packaging value chain through optimization of life cycle impacts and circularity,” Resour Conserv Recycl, vol. 173, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105691.
[21] S. Dominic, Y. A. W. Shardt, S. X. Ding, and H. Luo, “An Adaptive, Advanced Control Strategy for KPI-Based Optimization of Industrial Processes,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 3252–3260, May 2016, doi: 10.1109/TIE.2015.2504557.
[22] A. Padilla-Rivera, S. Russo-Garrido, and N. Merveille, “Addressing the social aspects of a circular economy: A systematic literature review,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 12, no. 19. MDPI, Oct. 01, 2020. doi: 10.3390/SU12197912.
[23] A. Luthin, M. Traverso, and R. H. Crawford, “Assessing the social life cycle impacts of circular economy,” J Clean Prod, vol. 386, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135725.
[24] A. Padilla-Rivera, B. B. T. do Carmo, G. Arcese, and N. Merveille, “Social circular economy indicators: Selection through fuzzy delphi method,” Sustain Prod Consum, vol. 26, pp. 101–110, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2020.09.015.
[25] V. Prieto-Sandoval, L. E. Torres-Guevara, M. Ormazabal, and C. Jaca, “Beyond the circular economy theory: Implementation methodology for industrial smes,” Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 425–438, 2021, doi: 10.3926/jiem.3413.
[26] A. Dwivedi, D. Agrawal, and J. Madaan, “Sustainable manufacturing evaluation model focusing leather industries in India: A TISM approach,” Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 319–359, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1108/JSTPM-06-2018-0054.
[27] P. Zhou, B. W. Ang, and K. L. Poh, “Comparing aggregating methods for constructing the composite environmental index: An objective measure,” 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.
[28] European Commission. Joint Research Centre. and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development., Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide. OECD, 2008.
[29] E. J. Lourenço, J. P. Pereira, R. Barbosa, and A. J. Baptista, “Using Multi-layer Stream Mapping to Assess the Overall Efficiency and Waste of a Production System: A Case Study from the Plywood Industry,” in Procedia CIRP, Elsevier B.V., 2016, pp. 128–133. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.086.
[30] J. Aguiar, “Application and Development of Multi-Layer Stream Mapping methodology-an extension of MSM 1.0 For resource efficiency and productivity management-applied to a heating device production system in a metalworking industry,” 2019.
[31] Michael. Black et al., Best available techniques (BAT) reference document for the tanning of hides and skins: Industrial Emissions Directive 2010/75/EU (integrated pollution prevention and control). Publications Office, 2013.
[32] F. Chiampo, S. Shanthakumar, R. Ricky, and G. Pattukandan Ganapathy, “Tannery: Environmental impacts and sustainable technologies,” Mater Today Proc, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.02.025.