Contract Design: A Key for Adopting Discontinuous Innovations in Socio-Technical Sustainability Transitions

Authors: Rami Darwish

Abstract:

The transport industry is transitioning to sustainable industrial systems to meet its environmental targets. At the heart of this transition lies the electrification of bus systems, which involves the introduction and testing of sustainable technologies in protected environments for customer evaluation. While the transition necessitates business-model innovation, practical implementation has proven to be complex. This article delves into efforts to present the business model of a bus operator engaged in public procurement with the goal of facilitating the industry's shift towards electrification. Through an in-depth case study, the influence of public contracts’ design on the evolution of a technology and the operator's business model for electrification is explored. While the extant literature suggests that public procurement can facilitate business-model innovation and sustainable development, the findings reveal that public-contract design can limit value creation and value capture in potential business models, locking organizations into existing business models and hindering the socio-technical transition to sustainability. Interestingly, public-procurement contract design can play a pivotal role in preventing sustainable innovations from breaking through. This highlights the importance of contract design as a vehicle for dialogue between businesses and authorities that can enable systemic change. The case study also illuminates a paradoxical scenario in which the transport authority was required to reconcile the efficiency and stability required for bus transport with the potential benefits of electrification technologies promising sustainability. Finally, recommendations for navigating and addressing this tension are provided. The implications of these findings extend to the literature on discontinuous innovation and business-model innovation.

Keywords: Sustainable transition, public procurement, business-model innovation, discontinuous innovation, lock-in.

References:

[1] Agarwal, G. K., Simonsson, J., Magnusson, M., Hald, K. S., & Johanson, A. (2022). Value-capture in digital servitization. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 33, 986–1004.
[2] Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001) Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, (3), 493–520.
[3] Ayres, R. U. (2000). On forecasting discontinuities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 65, 81–97.
[4] Berg, J. B., Thuesen, C. & Jensen, P. A. (2022). Procurement innovation as a vehicle for sustainable change – a case study of the Danish model of strategic partnerships, Construction Innovation, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.
[5] Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42-56.
[6] Bohnsack, R., Pinkse, J. and Kolk, A. (2014) Business models for sustainable technologies: Exploring business model evolution in the case of electric vehicles. Research Policy, 43(2), 284–300.
[7] Bower, J. L., & Christensen, C. M. (1995). Disruptive technologies: catching the wave. Harvard Business Review, 73(1), 43–53 (January–February).
[8] Burt, G. (2007) Why are we surprised at surprises? Integrating disruption theory and system analysis with the scenario methodology to help identify disruptions and discontinuities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(6), 731–749.
[9] Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002) The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529–555.
[10] Christensen, C. M. (2006). The ongoing process of building a theory of disruption. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23, 39–55.
[11] Christensen C.M., Bower J.L. (1996). Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms, Strategic Management Journal, 17 (3) (1996), pp. 197-218
[12] Christensen, C. M., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (1995) Explaining the attacker’s advantage: Technological paradigms, organizational dynamics, and the value network. Research Policy, 24(2), 233–257.
[13] Drucker, P. F. (1968). The age of discontinuity. Guidelines to our changing society. Harper & Row Publishers.
[14] Durugbo, C. (2013). Competitive product-service systems: Lessons from a multicase study. International Journal of Production Research, 51, 5671–5682.
[15] Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
[16] El Haddadi, T., Mourabit, T., & Haddadi, A. E. (2021). Sustainable public procurement in Morocco: An investigative survey regarding tender preparation. Sustainable Production and Consumption., 26, 33–43.
[17] Fetterman, D. M. (1989). Ethnography step by step, Applied social methods series. Sage Publications.
[18] Fink, M., Lang, R., & Harms, R. (2013). Local responses to global technological change - Contrasting restructuring practices in two rural communities in Austria. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80, 243–252.
[19] Foss, N. J., & Saebi, T. (2017). Fifteen Years of Research on Business Model Innovation: How Far Have We Come, and Where Should We Go? Journal of Management, 43(1), 200–227.
[20] Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1257–1274.
[21] Geels, F. W. (2005). Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(6 Spec. Iss.), 681–696.
[22] Geels, F. W. (2012). A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 471–482.
[23] Geels, F. W., & Kemp, R. (2007). Dynamics in socio-technical systems: Typology of change processes and contrasting case studies. Technology in Society, 29(4), 441–455.
[24] Geels, F. W., & Kemp, R. (2012) The multi-level perspective as a new perspective for studying socio-technical transitions. In F. W. Geels, R. Kemp, G. Dudley, & G. Lyons (Eds.), Automobility in Transition? A Socio-Technical Analysis of Sustainable Transport, Routledge.
[25] Geels, F. W. and Schot, J. (2007) ‘Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways’, Research Policy, 36(3), pp. 399–417.
[26] Grubic, T., & Jennions, I. (2018). Do outcome-based contracts exist? The investigation of power-by-the-hour and similar result-oriented cases. International Journal of Production Economics. 206, 209–219.
[27] Huijben, J. C. C. M., Verbong, G. P. J., & Podoynitsyna, K. S. (2016). Mainstreaming solar: Stretching the regulatory regime through business model innovation. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 20, 1- 15.
[28] Johnson MW, Christensen CM, Kagermann H (2008) Reinventing your business model. Harv Bus Rev 86(12):50–59.
[29] Kaplan, S. M. (1999). Discontinuous innovation and growth paradox. Strategic Leadership 27, 16–21.
[30] Magnusson, M., & Martini, A. (2008). Dual organizational capabilities: from theory to practice-the next challenge for continuous innovation. International Journal of Technology Management, 42, 1–19.
[31] Melander, L. and Arvidsson, A.P. (2020), "Getting innovations out of interactions in the public procurement context", Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 35 No. 12, pp. 2051-2065.
[32] Ministry of the Environment, Sweden's climate policy framework, https://www.government.se/articles/2021/03/swedens-climate-policy-framework/ (accessed August, 22, 2022).
[33] Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y. & Tucci, C. L. (2005). Clarifying business models: origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15(1), 1–43.
[34] Peñate-Valentín, M. C., del Carmen Sánchez-Carreira, M., & Pereira, Á. (2021). The promotion of innovative service business models through public procurement. An analysis of Energy Service Companies in Spain. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1857–1868.
[35] Poole, M. S., Van de Ven, A. (1989). Using Paradox to Build Management and Organization Theories. Academy of Management Review, 14, 562–578.
[36] Sandström, C., Berglund, H., & Magnusson, M. (2014). Symmetric assumptions in the theory of disruptive innovation: Theoretical and managerial implications. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23, 472–483.
[37] Schaltegger, S., Hansen, E. G., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2016). Business models for sustainability: Origins, present research, and future avenues. Organization & Environment, 29(1), 3–10.
[38] Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: Categories and interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment 20, 222–237.
[39] Sydow, G., Scheryögg, G. & Koch, J. (2009) Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Academy of Management Review, 34(4).
[40] Teece, D. J. (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285–305.
[41] Teece, D. J. (2010) Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 172–194.
[42] The Swedish climate policy framework, accessed June 2017: https://www.government.se/495f60/contentassets/883ae8e123bc4e42aa8d59296ebe0478/the-swedish-climate-policy-framework.pdf
[43] Tongur, S., & Engwall, M. (2014). The business model dilemma of technology shifts. Technovation, 34(9), 525–535.
[44] Trotter, P. A., and Brophy, A. (2022). Policy mixes for business model innovation: The case of off-grid energy for sustainable development in sub-Saharan Africa. Res. Policy. 51, 104528.
[45] Uyarra, E., & Kieron Flanagan (2010) Understanding the innovation impacts of public procurement. European Planning Studies, 18(1), 123-143.
[46] Uyarra, E., Edler, J., Garcia-Estevez, J., Georghiou, L., & Yeow, J. (2014), Barriers to innovation through public procurement: A supplier perspective. Technovation, 34(10), 631-645.
[47] Vergne, J., & Durand, R. (2010). The missing link between the theory and empirics of path dependence: conceptual clarification, testability issue, and methodological implications. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 736–759.
[48] Veryzer, R. W. (1998). Discontinuous innovation and the new product development process. Journal of Product Innovation Management 15, 304–321.
[49] Visnjic, I., Jovanovic, M., Neely, A., & Engwall, M. (2017). What brings the value to outcome-based contract providers? Value drivers in outcome business models. International Journal of Production Economics 192, 169–181.
[50] Walsh, S. T. (2004). Roadmapping a disruptive technology: A case study. The emerging microsystems and top-down nanosystems industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71, 161–185.
[51] Walsh, S. T., & Linton, J. D. (2000). Infrastructure for emergent industries based on discontinuous innovations. Engineering Management Journal 12, 23–32.
[52] Watzlawick, P., Weakland, J. H. & Fisch, R. (1974). Change: Principles of problem formation and problem resolution. Family Process, 31–39.
[53] Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications: A study in the economics of internal organization. Free Press.
[54] Williamsson, J. and Moen, O. (2022), “Barriers to business model innovation in the Swedish urban freight transport sector”, Research in Transportation Business & Management, p. 100799.
[55] Ye, G., Priem, R. L., & Alshwer, A. A. (2012). Achieving demand-side synergy from strategic diversification: How combining mundane assets can leverage consumer utilities. Organization Science, 23, 207–224.
[56] Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: design and methods, Applied social research methods Volume 5. Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal 12(2), 59–60.
[57] Yu, D., & Hang, C.C. (2010). A reflective review of disruptive innovation theory. International Journal of Management Reviews 12, 435–452.
[58] Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2010). Business model design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 216–226.
[59] Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: Recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019–1042.