Studying Efficiency of Digital Technology Facilitated Assessment Techniques in Higher Education
Authors: B. Ferdousi
Abstract:
This study examines the adoption of digital technology in academic assessment or e-assessment in higher education. The main focus of this research is to determine the impact of advanced digital technology on different assessment techniques such as formative assessment and summative assessment. The goal of this study is to critically evaluate the selection of different assessment methods using digital technology to enhance assessment for more effective learning. Given the increasing use of digital technology in the assessment of students' achievement in the learning process, this research is significant. Based on a literature review of different assessment techniques using technology, this study focuses on the formative and summative techniques of e-assessment. The paper offers an in-depth analysis of the innovative and creative use of digital technology in assessment. The findings of this research will enhance knowledge and in-depth understanding of using technology in assessment, especially in active learning environments, in higher academic institutions.
Keywords: E-assessment techniques, assessment for learning, assessment of learning, digital technology.
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 218References:
[1] L. K. Lookadoo, N. E. Bostwick, R. Ralston, F. J. Elizondo, S. Wilson, J. T. Shaw, and L. M. Jensen, “I Forgot I Wasn't Saving the World": The use of formative and summative assessment in instructional video games for undergraduate biology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 26 no. 6, 2017, pp. 597-612.
[2] M. Koomen and N. Zoanetti, “Strategic Planning Tools for Large-Scale Technology-Based Assessments,” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, vol. 25, no. 2, Pp. 200-223, 2018.
[3] S. S. Huda, Md. Kabir, and T. Siddiq, “E-Assessment in higher education: Students’ perspective,” International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), vol 16 no 2, pp. 250-258, 2020.
[4] T. Massinga, N. Schwinningb, M., Strieweb, C., Hancka, and M. Goedickeb, “E-Assessment using variable-content exercises in mathematical statistics,” Journal of Statistics Education, vol 26 no 3, pp.174–189, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2018.1518121
[5] W. Bryant, “Developing a strategy for using technology-enhanced items in large-scale standardized tests,” Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, vol 22, no 1, 2017.
[6] M. Bahar and M. Asil, “Attitude towards e-assessment: influence of gender, computer usage and level of education,” Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance And E-Learning, vol 33, no 3, 2pp. 21–237, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2018.1503529
[7] M.M. Neumann, J. L. Anthony, N.A. Erazo, and D.L. Neumann, “Assessment and technology: Mapping future directions in the early childhood classroom,” Front. Educ., vol 4, no 116, 2019. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2019.00116
[8] A. A. Gasmi and A. S. Z. Nadabi, “An exploratory study of learners’ perceptions about the effectiveness of active learning approaches, Journal of Language Teaching and Research, vol 14, no 5, pp. 1223-1232, September 2023. ISSN 1798-4769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1405.10 © 2023 Academy Publication
[9] B. Ferdousi, “The Effect of computer self-efficacy and attitude on undergraduate students’ intention to use emerging technology in classroom learning,” Journal of Computer Sciences and Applications, vol 7, no 1, pp. 50-55, 2019. DOI: 10.12691/jcsa-7-1-8.
[10] J. S. Deeley, “Using technology to facilitate effective assessment for learning and feedback in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,” 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1356906
[11] B. Ferdousi, and J. Bari, “Using application software, tools, and equipment to facilitate engineering and computer classes online,” International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Advanced Technology, vol 3, no 2, Pp. 1-10, 2022.
[12] G. Akcayir, and M. Akcayir, “The Flipped Classroom: A Review of Its Advantages and Challenges,” Computers & Education, vol 126, pp. 334-345, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.021
[13] O. Kvashnina, & E. Martynko, “Analyzing the potential of flipped classroom in ESL teaching, International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET),” vol 11, no 3. Pp. 71-73, 2016. DOI:10.3991/ijet.v11i03.5309
[14] J. Jo, H., Jun, and H. Lim, “A comparative study on gamification of the flipped classroom in engineering education to enhance the effects of learning,” Computer Application Engineering Education, vol 26, pp. 1626–1640, 2018. DOI: 10.1002/cae.21992
[15] S. Timmis, P. Broadfoot, R. Sutherland, and A. Oldfield, “Rethinking assessment in a digital age: Opportunities, challenges and risks,” British Educational Research Journal, vol 42, no 3, pp. 454–476, 2016.
[16] M.A., Khan, V., Vivek, M., Khojah, M.K., Nabi, M., Paul, and S.M. Minhaj, “Learners’ perspective towards e-exams during COVID-19 outbreak: Evidence from higher educational institutions of India and Saudi Arabia,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol 18, 6534, 2021. https:// doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126534
[17] H. J. Nieminen and L. Tuohilampi, “‘Finally studying for myself’ – examining student agency in summative and formative self-assessment models,” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol 45, no 7, pp. 1031-1045, 2020. DOI:10.1080/02602938.2020.1720595
[18] Z. Mohamadi, “Comparative effect of online summative and formative assessment on EFL student writing ability,” Studies in Educational Evaluation, vol 59. Pp. 29–40, 2018.
[19] S.D., Aji, N. M., Hudha, C., Huda, Z., Khoiro, W., Wartono, J. R., Batlolona, S., Alfarisa, A. B. D., Nandiyanto, and A. G. Abdullah, “Adaptive multimedia with android e-assessment to improve assessment efficiency,” 3rd Annual Applied Science and Engineering Conference (AASEC 2018). IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 434, 2018. 012294 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/434/1/012294
[20] V. Heyde, and A. Siebrits, “Higher-order e-assessment for physics in the digital age using Sakai,” The Physics Teacher, vol 57, pp. 32–34, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5084925
[21] P. K. Rajasekharan and V. A. Prakash, “Technological leverage in higher education: an evolving pedagogy,” Journal of International Education in Business, 10(2). pp. 130-146, 2017. © Emerald Publishing Limited. 2046-469X. DOI 10.1108/JIEB-09-2016-0034.
[22] S. Ketabi, and S. Ketabi, “Classroom and Formative Assessment in Second/Foreign Language Teaching and Learning,” Theory and Practice in Language Studies, vol 4, no 2, pp. 435-440, 2014. doi:10.4304/tpls.4.2.435-44, ISSN 1799-2591
[23] J. Clarke-Midura and C. Dede, “Assessment, technology, and change,” Journal of Research on Technology in Education (JRTE), vol 42, no 3, pp. 309–328, 2010. | ©2010 ISTE | www.iste.org/jrte
[24] Y. W. Guo and Z. Yan, “Formative and summative assessment in Hong Kong primary schools: Students’ attitudes matter,” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, vol 26, no 6, pp. 675-699, 2019. DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2019.1571993
[25] M. S. Ismail, R. D. Rahul, I. Patra, and E. Rezvani, “Formative vs. summative assessment: Impacts on academic motivation, attitude toward learning, test anxiety, and self‑regulation skill,” Language Testing in Asia, vol 12, no 40, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00191-4
[26] R., Luckin, W., Clark, K., Avramides, J. Hunter and M. Oliver, “Using teacher inquiry to support technology-enhanced formative assessment: A review of the literature to inform a new method,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol 25, no 1, pp. 85-97, 2017. DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2015.1121152
[27] N. J. Bacquet, “Implications of Summative and Formative Assessment in Japan - A Review of the Current Literature,” International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 2020. ISSN: 2202-9478. www.ijels.aiac.org.au
[28] N. Alahmadi, and M. Alrahaili, “The impact of the formative assessment in speaking test on Saudi students’ performance,” vol 10, January 2020. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol10no1.22
[29] F. Ahmed, S. Ali, and A. R. Shah, “Exploring variation in summative assessment: Language teachers’ knowledge of students’ formative assessment and its effect on their summative assessment,” Bulletin of Education and Research, vol 41, no 2, pp. 109-119, August 2019.
[30] D.R. Sadler, “Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems,” Instructional Science, vol 18, pp. 145–165, 1989.
[31] L. Peculea, and A. Peculea, “Perceptions of future engineering teachers on formative e-assessment using the classroom response system,” Journal Plus Education, XXII,1. pp. 23-32, 2019. ISSN: 1842-077X, E-ISSN (online) 2068-1151.
[32] J. M. Spector, D., Ifenthaler, D., Samspon, L., Yang, E., Mukama, A., Warusavitarana, K., Lokuge Dona, K., Eichhorn, A., Fluck, R., Huang, S., Bridges, J., Lu, Y., Ren, X., Gui, C. C., Deneen, J. San Diego, and D. C. Gibson, “Technology enhanced formative assessment for 21st century learning,” Educational Technology & Society, vol 19, no 3, pp. 58-71, 2016.
[33] B. A., Grosas, R. S., Raju, S. B., Schuett, J., Chuck, and J. T. Millar, “Determining if active learning through a formative assessment process translates to better performance in summative assessment,” Studies in Higher Education, vol 41, no 9, pp. 1595-1611, 2016. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2014.988704. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.988704
[34] K. T. Chan, “Embedding formative assessment in blended learning environment: The case of secondary Chinese language teaching in Singapore,” Education Sciences, vol 11, no 7, 360, 2021.
[35] M., Masita and N. Fitri, “The use of Plickers for formative assessment of vocabular mastery,” Ethical Lingua Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, vol 7, no 2, pp. 311–320, 2020.
[36] F. Remmi, and H. Hashim, “Primary School Teachers’ Usage and Perception of Online Formative Assessment Tools in Language Assessment,” International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, vol 10, no 1, pp. 290–303, 2021. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v10-i1/8846
[37] G. Svensäter and M. Rohlin, “Assessment model blending formative and summative assessments using the SOLO taxonomy,” European Journal of Dental Education, vol 27, pp. 149-157, 2022. doi:10.1111/eje.12787
[38] B. Sridharan, J. Tai, and D. Boud, “Does the use of summative peer assessment in collaborative group work inhibit good judgement?” Higher Education, vol 77, Pp. 853–870, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0305-7.
[39] M. Taras, Assessment - summative and formative - some theoretical reflections, British Journal of Educational Studies, vol 53, no 4, pp 466-478, 2005. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8527.2005.00307.x. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2005.00307.x
[40] I., Elmahdi, A., Al-Hattami, & H. Fawzi, “Using technology for formative assessment to improve students’ learning,” TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, vol 7, no 2, Pp. 182-188, 2018.
[41] S. K. Kwon, M., Lee, and D. Shin, “Educational assessment in the Republic of Korea: Lights and shadows of high-stake exam-based education system,” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, vol 24, 1, pp. 60–77, 2017.
[42] M. Mimirinis, “Qualitative differences in academics’ conceptions of e-assessment,” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol 44, no 2, pp. 233-248, 2019. DOI:10.1080/02602938.2018.1493087
[43] A., Mahshanian, R., Shoghi, and M.Bahrami, “Investigating the differential effects of formative and summative assessment on EFL learners’ end-of-term achievement,” Journal of Language Teaching and Research, vol 10, no 5, pp. 1055-1066, September 2019. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1005.19. ISSN 1798-4769
[44] E. McAlpin, Y, Bergner and M. Levine, “Summative assessments of web-based patient simulations of pre-clinical local anaesthesia and non-surgical extraction,” European Journal of Dental Education, vol 25, no 4, Pp. 733-743, 2021. DOI: 10.1111/eje.12652. Epub 2021 Jan 12. PMID: 33368916.
[45] W.J.A.J., Hendriks, N., Bakker, and H. Pluk, “Certainty-based marking in a formative assessment improves student course appreciation but not summative examination scores,” BMC Med Educ, vol 19, no 178, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1610-2