Design Criteria Recommendation to Achieve Accessibility In-house to Different Users

Authors: C. Valderrama-Ulloa, C. Schmitt, J.-P. Marchetti, V. Bucarey

Abstract:

Access to adequate housing is a fundamental human right and a crucial factor for health. Housing should be inclusive, accessible, and able to meet the needs of all its inhabitants at every stage of their lives without hindering their health, autonomy, or independence. This article addresses the importance of designing housing for people with disabilities, which varies depending on individual abilities, preferences, and cultural considerations. Based on the components of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, wheelchair users, little people (achondroplasia), children with autism spectrum disorder and Down syndrome were characterized, and six domains of activities related to daily life inside homes were defined. The article describes the main barriers homes present for this group of people. It proposes a list of architectural and design aspects to reduce barriers to housing use. The aspects are divided into three main groups: space management, building services, and supporting facilities. The article emphasizes the importance of consulting professionals and users with experience designing for diverse needs to create inclusive, safe, and supportive housing for people with disabilities.

Keywords: Achondroplasia, autism spectrum disorder, disability, down syndrome, wheelchair user.

References:

[1] World Health Organization (WHO). Towards a Common Language for Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2002.
[2] X. Ferrada., C. Valderrama, and C. Fuentes-Contreras. "Economic and Technical Analysis of Universal Accessibility in Social and Private Housing in Chile." IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 503, no. 1. 2020, pp 1-10
[3] Harvard University—Centre for Housing Studies. America’s Rental Housing: Expanding Options for Diverse and Growing Demand. 2015. Available online: http://jchs.harvard.edu/sites/jchs.harvard.edu/files/americas_rental_housing_2015_web.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2023).
[4] National Disability Services. State of the Disability Sector Report; National Disability Services: Deakin, Australia, 2015. Available online: https://disabilitysectorreport.nds.org.au/#page/12 (accessed on 1 March 2023).
[5] Muscular Dystrophy United Kingdom. Breaking Point: The Crisis in Accessible Housing and Adaptations. 2015. Available online: https://www.housinglin.org.uk/_assets/Resources/Housing/OtherOrganisation/Housing-adaptations-briefing-final.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2023).
[6] L. Stephens, K. Spalding, H. Aslam, H. Scott, S. Ruddick, L. Young and P. McKeever. “Inaccessible childhoods: evaluating accessibility in homes, schools and neighbourhoods with disabled children”. Children's geographies, vol 15, no 5, 2017, pp 583-599.
[7] Y. Wang and V. McCall V. “Evidence review of home adaptations in the UK and other OECD countries”. UK Collaborative centre for housing evidence. UK. 2022, 47pp
[8] S. Cumella and S. Heslam, S. “Supported housing for people with Down's syndrome”. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, vol 42, no 4, 2014, pp 251-256.
[9] C. Kramer and C. Pfaffenbach. “Should I stay or should I go? Housing preferences upon retirement in Germany”. J Hous and the Built Environ vol 31, 2016, pp 239–256
[10] C. Valderrama-Ulloa, X. Ferrada and F. Herrera. “Breaking Down Barriers: Findings from a Literature Review on Housing for People with Disabilities in Latin America”. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol 20, no 6, 2023, pp 4972-4995.
[11] E. Mulliner, M. Riley and V. Maliene. “Older people’s preferences for housing and environment characteristics”. Sustainability, vol 12, no 14, 2020, pp 5723-5735.
[12] J. Powell, S. Mackintosh, E. Bird, J. Ige, H. Garrett and M. Roys. “The role of home adaptations in improving later life”. Centre for ageing better. 2017, 40pp
[13] D. Sánchez-González, F. Rojo-Pérez, V. Rodríguez-Rodríguez and G. Fernández-Mayoralas. “Environmental and psychosocial interventions in age-friendly communities and active ageing: a systematic review”. International journal of environmental research and public health, vol 17, no 22, 2020, pp 8305-8315.
[14] L. Struckmeyer, J. Morgan-Daniel, S. Ahrentzen, and C. Ellison. “Home modification assessments for accessibility and aesthetics: A rapid review”. Health Environ. Res. Des. J. vol 14, 2021, pp313–327
[15] J. Percival and J. Hanson. “I don’t want to live for the day any more’: visually impaired people’s access to support, housing and independence”. British journal of visual impairment, vol 25, no 1, 2007, pp 51-67.
[16] A. Raggi, R. Quintas, E. Russo, A. Martinuzzi, D. Costardi, G. Frisoni, and M. Leonardi. “Mapping SAGE questionnaire to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)”. Clinical psychology & psychotherapy, vol 21, no 3, 2014, pp 199-203.
[17] WHO, 2018. Assistive technology. Online in: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/assistive-technology
[18] C. Valderrama-Ulloa, X. Ferrada, and F. Rouault. “A tool for universal accessibility assessment in the interior of dwellings”. Informes de la Construcción, vol 75, no 570, 2023, pp 491-503.
[19] Orphanet, 2019. Acondroplasia. Disponible en: https://www.orpha.net/consor/cgi-bin/
[20] B. Parisi, C. Matos, K. de Oliveira and R. de Araújo. “Acessibilidade e inclusão social da pessoa com nanismo: da legislação à realidade”. Revista Baru-Revista Brasileira de Assuntos Regionais e Urbanos, vol 7, no 1, 2021, pp 19-29.
[21] A. Tavares, R. Cardoso, J. Santos and G. Sampaio. “Acessibilidade para pessoas com deficiência: algumas dificuldades em projetar para indivíduos com nanismo”. Anais do VI Encontro Nacional de Ergonomia do Ambiente Construído & VII Seminário Brasileiro de Acessibilidade Integral, vol 2, no 7, 2016, pp 609-620.
[22] Naciones Unidas sf, Síndrome de Down, Disponible en https://www.un.org/es/observances/down-syndrome-day
[23] B. Brusilovsky. “Modelo para diseñar espacios accesibles. Espectro cognitivo”. La ciudad Accessible. 2014, 232pp Disponible en http://riberdis.cedid.es/handle/11181/5484
[24] WHO, 2022. Autismo Disponible en https://www.who.int/es/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/autism-spectrum-disorders-(asd)
[25] WHO, 2023. Austismo Datos y cifras. Disponible en https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/autism-spectrum-disorders
[26] M. Mostafa. “An architecture for autism: Concepts of design intervention for autistic user”, International Journal of Architectural Research, vol 2, no 1, 2008, pp. 189–211.
[27] A. Meyers, J. Anderson, D. Miller, K. Shipp and H. Hoenig. “Barriers, facilitators, and access for wheelchair users: substantive and methodologic lessons from a pilot study of environmental effects”. Social science & medicine, vol 55, no 8, 2002, pp 1435-1446.
[28] N. Rahmawati and B. Jiang. “Develop a bedroom design guideline for progressive ageing residence: A case study of Indonesian older adults”. Gerontechnology, vol 18, no 3, 2019, pp 180-192
[29] Observatorio estatal de la Discapacidad. “Requerimientos de accesibilidad y diseño para personas con acondroplasia y otras displasias esqueléticas con enanismo (ADEE). Propuestas normativas, modelos prescriptivos y prácticas recomendables”, 2020, 137 pp. España.
[30] W. Nagib and A. Williams, A. “Toward an autism-friendly home environment”. Housing Studies, vol 32, no 2, 2017, 140-167
[31] E. Briggs Fonseca. “Creando espacios inclusivos. Accesibilidad cognitiva en edificios de viviendas para personas con Síndrome de Down”. Trabajo Fin de Grado. Universitat Politécnica de Valencia. 2020, 85pp
[32] A. Rico Guardiola. “Estrategias de accesibilidad cognitiva: accesibilidad cognitiva en edificios de vivienda para personas con Síndrome de Down”. Trabajo Final de Grado. Universitat Politecnica de Valencia. 2021, 75pp