Determination of the Gain in Learning the Free-Fall Motion of Bodies by Applying the Resource of Previous Concepts
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33093
Determination of the Gain in Learning the Free-Fall Motion of Bodies by Applying the Resource of Previous Concepts

Authors: Ricardo Merlo

Abstract:

In this paper, we analyzed the different didactic proposals for teaching about the free fall motion of bodies available online. An important aspect was the interpretation of the direction and sense of the acceleration of gravity and of the falling velocity of a body, which is why we found different applications of the Cartesian reference system used and also different graphical presentations of the velocity as a function of time and of the distance traveled vertically by the body in the period of time that it was dropped from a height h0. In this framework, a survey of previous concepts was applied to a voluntary group of first-year university students of an Engineering degree before and after the development of the class of the subject in question. Then, Hake's index (0.52) was determined, which resulted in an average learning gain from the meaningful use of the reference system and the respective graphs of velocity versus time and height versus time.

Keywords: Didactic gain, free–fall, physics teaching, previous knowledge.

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 205

References:


[1] Becerra Rodríguez, D.; Vargas Sánchez, A.; Boude Figueredo, O. and Benítez Mendivelso, M. (2020). Strategies that support the learning of free fall of bodies. Educación. 14 (48), 148 - 160.
[2] Rubio, L.; Prieto, J. and Ortíz, J. (2016). Mathematics in simulation with GeoGebra. An experience with free fall motion. International journal of educational research and innovation (IJERI). 2, 90 - 111.
[3] Sánchez, M. (2012). Seven issues to disseminate and understand aspects of free fall. Am. Lat. J. Phys. Educ. 5 (3), 623 - 632.
[4] Amadeu, R. and Leal, J. (2013). Advantages of the use of computer simulations in physics learning. Science Education 31(3), 177 - 188.
[5] Montero, G.; García, A.; Ríos, V. and Román, A. (2017). Study of free fall using different experimental techniques. Am. Lat. J. Phys. Educ. 12 (1), 1302(1) - 1302(8).
[6] Díaz Forero, J.; Espitia Rico, M. and Cudris García, E. (2014). Study of free fall from non-inertial reference frames using computational tools. Revista Científica. Science and Engineering Section. Bogota, D.C. 19 (2), 34 - 40. https://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/revcie/issue/view/562
[7] F. Sears, M. Zemansky, H. Young, and R. Freedman. University Physics, 2009, twelfth edition, vol 1, pp 54, eg 2.6.
[8] J. Kane, M. Sternheim. Physics. Ed. Reverté. S. A. 1982, pp 16, eg 1.13
[9] Hake, R. (1998). Interactive - engagement vs. Traditiona methods: a six - thousand - Student survey of mechanisc test data for introductory Physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64 - 74.
[10] Calderon Garduño, L.; Ortega López, A. and Mora, C. 2013. Evaluation of conceptual learning of free-fall motion. Am. Lat. J. Phys. Educ. 7 (2), 275 - 283.