Forward Speed and Draught Requirement of a Semi-Automatic Cassava Planter under Different Wheel Usage

Authors: M. O. Ale, S. I. Manuwa, O. J. Olukunle, T. Ewetumo

Abstract:

Five varying speeds of 1.5, 1.8, 2.1, 2.3 and 2.6 km/h were used at a constant soil depth of 100 mm to determine the effects of forward speed on the draught requirement of a semi-automatic cassava planter under pneumatic wheel and rigid wheel usage on a well-prepared sandy clay loam soil. The soil draught was electronically measured using an on-the-go soil draught measuring instrumentation system developed for the purpose of this research. The results showed an exponential relationship between forward speed and draught in which draught ranging between 24.91 and 744.44 N increased with an increase in forward speed in the rigid wheel experiment. This is contrary to the polynomial relationship observed in the pneumatic wheel experiment in which the draught varied between 96.09 and 343.53 N. It was observed in the experiments that the optimum speed of 1.5 km/h had the least values of draught in both the pneumatic wheel and rigid wheel experiments with higher values in the pneumatic experiment. It was generally noted that the rigid wheel planter with the less value of draught requires less energy requirement for operation. It is therefore concluded that operating the semi-automatic cassava planter with rigid wheels will be more economical for cassava farmers than operating the planter with pneumatic wheels.

Keywords: Cassava planter, planting, forward speed, draught, wheel type.

References:

[1] Macmillan R. H. (2002). Tractor Performance and Soft Soil-Empirical; Chapter 5, The Mechanics of Tractor-Implement Performance. University of Melbourne.
[2] M. Veerangouda and B. Sridhar (2010). Effect of Planter Forward Speed and Depth of Operation on Draft and Ground wheel Slip. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 23(4):665.
[3] N. O. K. Abdalla and H. D. Mohammed (2017). Comparative of Field Performance Evaluation of Two Planters as Affected by Soil Condition and Forward Speed. International Journal of Contemporary Applied Sciences. 4 (3): 43-49.
[4] M. O Ale, O. C Ademosun, and T. Ewetumo (2017). Performance evaluation of an Instrumentation System for Soil Draught Measurement. Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science Studies (JMESS). 3(5):1757-1763.
[5] Lungkapin, J. L., Salokhe, V. M, Kalsirisilp, R. and Nakashima. (2007). Development of Stem Cutting for a Cassava Planter. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR E-Journal. Manuscript PM 07 008. Vol. IX. July, 2007.
[6] O. A. Oyedeji, L. A. S. Agbetoye, and O. T. d Adedeji, (2011). Development and Performance Evaluation of a Cassava Planter. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference and 32nd Annual General Meeting of NIAE held in Ilorin, Nigeria in October, 2011.
[7] A. R. Kamal and A. I. Bamgboye (2019). Development of a Metering Device for a Two Row Single Feeder Cassava Planter. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference and 20th Conference of the Institution of Agricultural Engineers held at Landmark University, Omu-Aran, Nigeria in September, 2019.
[8] O. C. Ademosun (1986). Determination of the optimum capacities of farm machines to adapt for a medium scale multi-crop production. Agricultural systems. 21:33-57.
[9] J. Algirda., P. Gediminas and J. Antanas 2018. Mathematical Description of Tractors Slippage with Variable Tire Inflation Pressure. Engineering for Rural Development, Jelgava 23: 405-411
[10] G. Moitzi, M. Haas, H. Wagentristl, J. Boxberger and A. Gronauer (2013) Energy consumption in cultivating and ploughing with traction improvement system and consideration of the rear furrow wheel-load in ploughing. Soil & Tillage Research, 134, 2013, pp. 56-60.
[11] S. K. Amponsah, E. Y. Bobobee, W A. Agyare, J. B. Okyere, J. Aveyire, S.R. King, and J. Sarkodie- Addo (2014). Mechanical Cassava Harvesting as Influenced by Seedbed Preparation and Cassava Variety. Apply Eng. Agric; 30(3):391-403.
[12] H. Jebur and Y. Alsayyah (2017). Study of the soil moisture content and the tractor speed on the performance efficiency of the machinery unit. Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science.;10(5):65-70.
[13] M. Y. Tayel, S. M. Shaba and H. A. Mansor (2015). Effect of Ploughing Conditions on the Tractor Wheel Slippage and Fuel Consumption in Sandy Soil. International Journal of Chem Tech Research. 8(12): 151-159.
[14] A. M. Mamkagh (2019). Effect of Soil Tillage speed, Depth, Ballast Weight and used Implement on Wheel Slippage of the Tractor, A Review. Asian Journal of Advances in Agricultural Research 9 (1): 1-7.
[15] A. A. Al-Janobi and A. A. Al-Suhaibani (1998). Draft of primary tillage implements in sandy loam soil. Transaction of the ASAE. 14(4):343-348.
[16] D. Ansorge and R.J. Godwin (2007). The effect of tyres and a rubber track at high axle loads on soil compaction, Part 1: Single axle-studies; Bio-systems Engineering 98 (1):115-126.