Analysis of Initial Entry-Level Technology Course Impacts on STEM Major Selection

Authors: Ethan Shafer, Timothy Graziano, Jay Fisher

Abstract:

This research seeks to answer whether first-year courses at institutions of higher learning can impact STEM major selection. Unlike many universities, an entry-level technology course (often referred to as CS0) is required for all United States Military Academy (USMA) students–regardless of major–in their first year of attendance. Students at the Academy choose their major at the end of their first year of studies. Through student responses to a multi-semester survey, this paper identifies a number of factors that potentially influence STEM major selection. Student demographic data, pre-existing exposure and access to technology, perceptions of STEM subjects, and initial desire for a STEM major are captured before and after taking a CS0 course. An analysis of factors that contribute to student perception of STEM and major selection are presented. This work provides recommendations and suggestions for institutions currently providing or looking to provide CS0-like courses to their students.

Keywords: STEM major, STEM, pedagogy, digital literacy.

References:

[1] USMA Academic Program.
[2] Economic Well-Being of U.S. Households in 2021. Technical report, Federal Reserve, May 2022.
[3] Noura Albarakati, Lisa DiPippo, and Victor Fay-Wolfe. Rethinking CS0 to Improve Performance and Retention. In Proceedings of the 23rd Australasian Computing Education Conference, ACE ’21, pages 131–137, New York, NY, USA, March 2021. Association for Computing Machinery.
[4] Adel S Aldosary and Sadi A Assaf. Analysis of factors influencing the selection of college majors by newly admitted students. Higher Education Policy, 9(3):215–220, 1996.
[5] Thomas Babbitt, Charles Schooler, and Kyle King. Punch Cards to Python: A Case Study of a CS0 Core Course. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE ’19, pages 811–817, New York, NY, USA, February 2019. Association for Computing Machinery.
[6] Jeri Mullins Beggs, John H. Bantham, and Steven Taylor. Distinguishing the factors influencing college students’ choice of major. College Student Journal, 42(2):381–395, June 2008. Publisher: Project Innovation (Alabama).
[7] Daniel C. Cliburn. A CS0 course for the liberal arts. In Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, SIGCSE ’06, pages 77–81, New York, NY, USA, March 2006. Association for Computing Machinery.
[8] Jessica Q. Dawson, Meghan Allen, Alice Campbell, and Anasazi Valair. Designing an Introductory Programming Course to Improve Non-Majors’ Experiences. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE ’18, pages 26–31, New York, NY, USA, February 2018. Association for Computing Machinery.
[9] Kathleen M Galotti. Making a ”Major” Real-Life Decision: College Students Choosing an Academic Major. 1999.
[10] Pawel Grabarczyk, Sebastian Mateos Nicolajsen, and Claus Brabrand. On the Effect of Onboarding Computing Students without Programming-Confidence or -Experience. In Proceedings of the 22nd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research, Koli Calling ’22, pages 1–8, New York, NY, USA, November 2022. Association for Computing Machinery.
[11] Sunyoung Han. Korean Students’ Attitudes toward STEM Project-Based Learning and Major Selection. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 17(2):529–548, April 2017. Publisher: Educational Consultancy, Ltd (EDAM).
[12] Michael Haungs, Christopher Clark, John Clements, and David Janzen. Improving first-year success and retention through interest-based CS0 courses. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM technical symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE ’12, pages 589–594, New York, NY, USA, February 2012. Association for Computing Machinery.
[13] Patrick L. Hill, Joshua J. Jackson, Nicole Nagy, Gabriel Nagy, Brent W. Roberts, Oliver L¨udtke, and Ulrich Trautwein. Majoring in Selection, and Minoring in Socialization: The Role of the College Experience in Goal Change Post–High School. Journal of Personality, 84(2):194–203, 2016. eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jopy.12151.
[14] Ahlam Lee. Determining the effects of computer science education at the secondary level on STEM major choices in postsecondary institutions in the United States. Computers & Education, 88:241–255, October 2015.
[15] Albert Lionelle, Josette Grinslad, and J. Ross Beveridge. CS 0: Culture and Coding. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE ’20, pages 227–233, New York, NY, USA, February 2020. Association for Computing Machinery.
[16] Charles A. Malgwi, Martha A. Howe, and Priscilla A. Burnaby. Influences on Students’ Choice of College Major. Journal of Education for Business, 80(5):275–282, May 2005. Publisher: Routledge eprint: https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.80.5.275-282.
[17] Cindy Marling and David Juedes. CS0 for Computer Science Majors at Ohio University. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education, pages 138–143, Memphis Tennessee USA, February 2016. ACM.
[18] Dawn McKinney, Alex Daniel Edgcomb, Roman Lysecky, and Frank Vahid. Improving Pass Rates by Switching from a Passive to an Active Learning Textbook in CS0. June 2020.
[19] Maarten Pinxten, Bieke De Fraine, Wim Van Den Noortgate, Jan Van Damme, Tinneke Boonen, and Gudrun Vanlaar. ‘I choose so I am’: a logistic analysis of major selection in university and successful completion of the first year. Studies in Higher Education, 40(10):1919–1946, November 2015. Publisher: Routledge eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.914904.
[20] Robert H Sloan and Patrick Troy. CS 0.5: A Better Approach to Introductory Computer Science for Majors. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 40(1):271–275, February 2008.
[21] Aubrey Whitehead. Examining Influence of Family, Friends, and Educators on First-Year College Student Selection STEM Major Selection. Journal of Mason Graduate Research, 5(2):58–84, May 2018. Number: 2.
[22] Zo¨e J. Wood, John Clements, Zachary Peterson, David Janzen, Hugh Smith, Michael Haungs, Julie Workman, John Bellardo, and Bruce DeBruhl. Mixed Approaches to CS0: Exploring Topic and Pedagogy Variance after Six Years of CS0. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE ’18, pages 20–25, New York, NY, USA, February 2018. Association for Computing Machinery.
[23] Alparslan S¸ ahin, Niyazi Erdo˘gan, Jim Morgan, Mary Capraro, and Robert Capraro. The Effects of High School Course Taking and SAT Scores On College Major Selection. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 2(3):96–109, January 2013. Number: 3.