Student Perceptions of Defense Acquisition University Courses: An Explanatory Data Collection Approach

Authors: Melissa C. LaDuke

Abstract:

The overarching purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the current format of online delivery for Defense Acquisition University (DAU) courses and Air Force Acquisition (AFA) personnel participation. AFA personnel (hereafter named “student”) were particularly of interest, as they have been mandated to take anywhere from 3 to 30 online courses to earn various DAU specialization certifications. Participants in this qualitative case study were AFA personnel who pursued DAU certifications in science and technology management, program/contract management, and other related fields. Air Force personnel were interviewed about their experiences with online courses. The data gathered were analyzed and grouped into 12 major themes. The themes tied into the theoretical framework and addressed either teacher-centered or student-centered educational practices within DAU. Based on the results of the data analysis, various factors contributed to student perceptions of DAU courses to include the online course construct and relevance to their job. The analysis also found students want to learn the information presented but would like to be able to apply the information learned in meaningful ways.

Keywords: Educational theory, computer-based training, interview, student perceptions, online course design, teacher positionality.

References:

[1] C. Lankshear, & M. Knobel. Researching new literacies: Web 2.0 practices and insider perspectives. E-learning, vol. 4 no. 3, pp. 224–240, 2007.
[2] C. Lankshear, & M. Knobel. Sampling “the new” in new literacies. A New Literacies Sampler, vol. 29, pp. 1–24, 2007.
[3] R. J. Vallerand., L. G. Pelletier, M. R. Blais, N. M. Briere, C. Senecal, & E. F. Vallieres (1992). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 52, pp. 1003–1017.
[4] R. Kop. (2011). The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a massive open online course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, vol. 12 no. 3, pp. 19–38.
[5] D. I. Cordova and M. R. Lepper. Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, no. 88, pp. 715-730, 1996
[6] A. Wigfield, & J. S. Eccels. Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 25, pp. 68–81, 2000.
[7] C. M. Reigeluth, (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, Volume II. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1999.
[8] R. A. Reiser. A history of instructional design and technology: Part II: A history of instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 57-67, 2001
[9] V. Rodriguez. The teaching brain and the end of the empty vessel. The Author, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 177–185, 2012
[10] P. Nugent. Methodological behaviorism. Retrieved from https://psychologydictionary.org/methodological-behaviorism/ (2013).
[11] A. Sfard. On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 4–13, 1998.
[12] M. C. Schug. Teacher-centered instruction. In Where Did Social Studies Go Wrong? J. Leming., L. Ellington, & K. Porter-Magee, Eds. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation, 2003, pp. 94–110.
[13] G. Siemens. Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Retrieved from http://er.dut.ac.za/bitstream/handle/123456789/69/Siemens_2005 Connectivism_A_learning_theory_for_the_digital_age.pdf (2004).
[14] J. Piaget. The Origins of Intelligence in Children. (M. Cook, Trans). New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, 1952. (Original work published 1936)
[15] D. Oblinger. The next generation of educational engagement. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, no. 8, 2004.
[16] J. S. Brown, A. Collins, & P. Duguid. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 32-42, 1989.
[17] J. Lave, & E. Wenger. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1991.
[18] Defense Acquisition Workforce Improvement Act. DAWIA certification & core plus development guides. Retrieved from http://icatalog.dau.mil/onlinecatalog/CareerLvl.aspx (2017).
[19] M. S. Knowles. The Modern Practice of Adult Education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1980.
[20] R. St. Clair. Andragogy revisited: Theory for the 21st century? Myths and realities. ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education, vol. 19, pp. 2-4, 2002.
[21] C. A. Hansman. Context-based adult learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, no. 89, pp. 43–51, 2001.
[22] R. K. Yin, Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Applied Social Methods) (5th ed). Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 2013.
[23] P. C. Price, R. S. Jhangiani, & I. A. Chiang, Research Methods in Psychology (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Saylor, 2015.
[24] B. Glaser, B. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 436–445, 1965.
[25] B. G. Glaser, & A. L. Strauss. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine, 1967.
[26] A. J. Onwuegbuzie, N. L. Leech, & K. M. T. Collins. Qualitative analysis techniques for the review of the literature. The Qualitative Report, vol. 17, no. 28, pp. 1–28, 2012.
[27] Y. S. Lincoln, & E. G. Guba. Naturalistic Inquiry. London, UK: SAGE, 1985.
[28] S. Imenda. Is there a conceptual difference between theoretical and conceptual frameworks. Journal of Social Science, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 185–195, 2014.
[29] M. K. Smith, M. K. The cognitive orientation to learning. Retrieved from http://infed.org/mobi/the-cognitive-orientation-to-learning/ (1999).
[30] E. B. N. Sanders. From user-centered to participator design approaches. In Design and Social Sciences: Making Connections. J. Frascara, Ed. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis, 2002, pp. 1–8.
[31] H. Huang. Toward constructivism for adult learners in online learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 27-37, 2002.
[32] Defense Acquisition University. Communities. Retrieved from https://www.dau.edu/community-hub#All||title_asc (2017).
[33] F. Bell. Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enable learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 98–118, 2011.
[34] E. L. Deci, R. J. Vallerand, L. G. Pelletier, & R. M. Ryan. Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, vol. 26, no. 3 & 4, pp. 325-346, 1991
[35] S. B. Merriam. Andragogy and self-directed learning: Pillars of adult learning theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, vol. 2001, no. 89, pp. 3–14, 2001.
[36] S. Brookfield. Adult learning: An overview. In International Encyclopedia of Education. A. Tuinjman, Ed. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, 1995, pp. 275-280.