Sustainability Assessment of Agriculture and Biodiversity Issues through an Innovative Knowledge Mediation System Using Deliberation Support Tools and INTEGRAAL Method Based on Stakeholder Involvement
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33122
Sustainability Assessment of Agriculture and Biodiversity Issues through an Innovative Knowledge Mediation System Using Deliberation Support Tools and INTEGRAAL Method Based on Stakeholder Involvement

Authors: Ashiquer Rahman

Abstract:

The cutting edge knowledge mediation system called ‘ePLANETe’ provides a framework for building knowledge, tools, and methods for education, research, and sustainable practices, as well as the deliberative assessment support for Higher Education, Research Institutions, and elsewhere e.g., the collaborative learning and research on sustainability and biodiversity issues of territorial development sectors. The paper is to present the analytical perspective of the ‘ePLANETe’ concept and functionalities as an experimental platform for contributing to sustainability assessment. Now the ‘ePLANETe’ can be seen as experimentation of the challenges of “ICT for Green”. The digital technologies of ‘ePLANETe’ are exploited (i) to facilitate collaborative research, learning tools, and knowledge for sustainability challenges, and (ii) as deliberation support tools in pursuing of sustainability performance and practices in territorial governance, public policy, and business strategy, as well as in the higher education sectors itself. The paper investigates the dealing capacity of qualitative and quantitative assessment of agriculture sustainability through the stakeholder-based integrated assessment. Specifically, this paper focuses on integrating system methodologies with Deliberation Support Tools (DST) and INTEGRAAL method for collective assessment and decision-making in implementing regional plans. The report aims to identify the effective knowledge and tools to enable deliberations methodologies regarding practices on the sustainability of agriculture and biodiversity issues, societal responsibilities, and regional planning, concentrating on the question: “How to effectively mobilize resources (knowledge, tools, and methods) from different sources and at different scales regarding on agriculture and biodiversity issues to address sustainability challenges” that will create the scope for qualitative and quantitative assessments of sustainability as a new landmark of the agriculture sector.

Keywords: Biodiversity, Deliberation Support Tools, INTEGRAAL, stakeholder.

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 287

References:


[1] Zhang, X., Yao, G., Vishwakarma, S., Dalin, C., Komarek, A.M., Kanter, D.R., Davis, K.F., Pfeifer, K., Zhao, J., Zou, T., D’Odorico, P., Folberth, C., Rodriguez, F.G., Fanzo, J., Rosa, L., Dennison, W., Musumba, M., Heyman, A. and Davidson, E.A. (2021). Quantitative assessment of agricultural sustainability reveals divergent priorities among nations. One Earth
[2] Ryan, M.H., Graham, J.H., Morton, J.B. and Kirkegaard, J.A. (2019). Research must use a systems agronomy approach if management of the arbuscularmycorrhizal symbiosis is to contribute to sustainable intensification. The New Phytologist, (online) 222(3), pp.1176–1178. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30657177/ (Accessed 5 Mar. 2022).
[3] X. Le Roux, Baudry, J. and Burel, F. (2009). Agriculture and biodiversity. Valuing synergies.
[4] Wedderburn, L., P. Blackett, E. Smith, Kelly S. (2009), Integrating Deliberative and System Dynamics: An evaluation of methods and process, unpublished report, AgResearch, Hamilton, December 2009, 49 p.
[5] O'connor, M., Small, B. and Wedderburn, E. (2010). Sustainable Agriculture in Aotearoa: Social Learning through Piecewise Deliberation. (online) Available at: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00879693/document (Accessed 5 Mar. 2022).
[6] O’CONNOR M. (2006c), Deliberative Sustainability Assessment: Multiple Scales, Multiple Stakeholders, Multidisciplinarity and Multiple Bottom Lines, Methodological study for Work Package WP6 of the SRDTOOLS Project (Methods and tools for evaluating the impact of cohesion policies on sustainable regional development, EC 6th Framework Programme, Contract No.502485, 2005-2006), Rapport de Recherche du C3ED No.2006-01, Guyancourt, UVSQ, France, 2006.
[7] Maxim, L., Spangenberg, J.H. and O’Connor, M. (2009). An analysis of risks for biodiversity under the DPSIR framework. Ecological Economics, 69(1), pp.12–23.
[8] RAHMAN, Ashiquer (2019), Mobilizing ePLANETe. Blueknowledge mediation portal to deal with new challenges of sustainable development in Higher Education and Research Establishments (HERE) from a perspective of Knowledge Economy. Thèse de doctoraten sciences économiques (dir. Dr. Jean-Marc Douguet). Soutenance : Guyancourt, 17 septembre 2019, Université Paris Saclay, France.
[9] Huser, B., Rutledge, D. T., Van Delden, H., & Woods, R. A. (2009). Development of an integrated spatial decision support system (ISDSS) for Local Government in New Zealand.
[10] O’Connor, M. P. (2006). Building Knowledge Partnerships with ICT? Some lessons from GOUVERNe and VIRTUALIS
[11] Small, B. (2016). Sustainable Agriculture in Aotearoa: Social Learning throughPiecewiseDeliberation. Agresearch. https://www.academia.edu/28870758/Sustainable_Agriculture_in_Aotearoa_Social_Learning_through_Piecewise_Deliberation