An Overview of Project Management Application in Computational Fluid Dynamics

Authors: Sajith Sajeev

Abstract:

The application of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is widespread in engineering and industry, including aerospace, automotive, and energy. CFD simulations necessitate the use of intricate mathematical models and a substantial amount of computational power to accurately describe the behavior of fluids. The implementation of CFD projects can be difficult, and a well-structured approach to project management is required to assure the timely and cost-effective delivery of high-quality results. This paper's objective is to provide an overview of project management in CFD, including its problems, methodologies, and best practices. The study opens with a discussion of the difficulties connected with CFD project management, such as the complexity of the mathematical models, the need for extensive computational resources, and the difficulties associated with validating and verifying the results. In addition, the study examines the project management methodologies typically employed in CFD, such as the Traditional/Waterfall model, Agile and Scrum. Comparisons are made between the advantages and disadvantages of each technique, and suggestions are made for their effective implementation in CFD projects. The study concludes with a discussion of the best practices for project management in CFD, including the utilization of a well-defined project scope, a clear project plan, and effective teamwork. In addition, it highlights the significance of continuous process improvement and the utilization of metrics to monitor progress and discover improvement opportunities. This article is a resource for project managers, researchers, and practitioners in the field of CFD. It can aid in enhancing project outcomes, reducing risks, and enhancing the productivity of CFD projects. This paper provides a complete overview of project management in CFD and is a great resource for individuals who wish to implement efficient project management methods in CFD projects.

Keywords: Project management, Computational Fluid Dynamics, Traditional/Waterfall methodology, agile methodology, scrum methodology.

References:

[1] Mahdi, Mohammed Najah, Mohd Hazli Mohamed Zabil, Abdul Rahim Ahmad, Roslan Ismail, Yunus Yusoff, Lim Kok Cheng, Muhammad Sufyian Bin Mohd Azmi, Hayder Natiq, and Hushalini Happala Naidu. 2021. "Software Project Management Using Machine Learning Technique—A Review" Applied Sciences 11, no. 11: 5183. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115183
[2] Niazi, Mahmood & Mahmood, Sajjad & Alshayeb, Mohammad & Riaz, Mohammed & Faisal, Kanaan & Khan, Siffat Ullah & Richardson, Ita & Cerpa, Narciso. (2016). Challenges of Project Management in Global Software Development: A Client-Vendor Analysis. Information and Software Technology. 80. 10.1016/j.infsof.2016.08.002.
[3] A. K. M. Z. Islam and Dr. A. Ferworn, “A Comparison between Agile and Traditional Software Development Methodologies,” GJCST, pp. 7–42, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.34257/GJCSTCVOL20IS2PG7.
[4] L. Bendix and T. Ekman, “Software Configuration Management in Agile Development,” p. 19.
[5] Najihi, S., Elhadi, S., Abdelouahid R., & Marzak A., (2022). Software Testing from an Agile and Traditional View. The second International Workshop on Edge IA-IoT for Smart Agriculture August 9-11, 2022, Niagara Falls, Canada.
[6] Sajeev, S., McLaury, B. S., & Shirazi, S. A (2018, June). Threshold Particle Concentration in Single-Phase and Multiphase Flow Sand Transport in Pipeline. 11th North American Conference on Multiphase Production Technology. OnePetro.
[7] Dyba, T., Dingsoyr, T., 2008. Empirical studies of agile software development: a systematic review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 50 (9), 833–859.
[8] Vieira, R. E., Sajeev, S., Shirazi, S. A., McLaury, B.S., and G. Kouba. “Experiments and Modelling of Sand Erosion in Gas-Liquid Cylindrical Cyclone Separators Under Gas Production and Low-Liquid Loading Conditions.” 17th International Conference on Multiphase Production Technology, Cannes, France, June 2015.
[9] Atkinson, R., 1999. Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 17 (6), 337–342.
[10] Sajeev, S., McLaury, B., & Shirazi, S. (2017). Critical Velocities for Particle Transport from Experiments and CFD Simulations. International Journal of Environmental and Ecological Engineering, 11(6), 548-552.
[11] Kerzner, H., 2003. Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. 8th ed. Wiley, New York.
[12] Parsi, M., Vieira, R., Sajeev, S. K., McLaury, B. S., and S. A Shirazi. “Experimental Study of Erosion in Vertical Slug/Churn Flow.” Corrosion, Dallas Texas, March 2015.
[13] Munns, A., Bjeirmi, B., 1996. The role of project management in achieving project success. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 14 (2), 81–87
[14] Sajeev, Sajith K., Brenton S. McLaury, and Siamack A. Shirazi. "Experiments and Modelling of Critical Transport Velocity of Threshold (Very Low) Particle Concentration in Single-Phase and Multiphase Flows." BHR 19th International Conference on Multiphase Production Technology. OnePetro, 2019
[15] Jugdev, K., Müller, R., 2005. A retrospective look at our evolving understanding of project success. Proj. Manag. J. 36 (4), 19–31.
[16] Sajeev, S. K. (2019). Particle Transport in Horizontal Pipes for Single-Phase and Multiphase Flows at Very Low Concentrations Including the Threshold Concentration. The University of Tulsa.
[17] Sajeev, S. K. (2016). Sand Erosion of Gas-Liquid Cylindrical Cyclone Separators Under Gas Production and Low-Liquid Loading Conditions (Doctoral dissertation, University of Tulsa).
[18] Shenhar, A.J., Dvir, B., 1997. Mapping the dimensions of project success. Proj. Manag. J. 28 (2), 5–9
[19] Arabnejad, H., S. Sajeev, A. Guimmarra, R. Vieira, and S. A. Shirazi. "Experimental Study and Modeling of Sand Erosion in the Gas-Liquid Cylindrical Cyclone GLCC Separators." In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. OnePetro, 2016.
[20] Cooper, D., Schindler, P., 2008. Business Research Methods. Irwin/McGrawHill, New York, NY
[21] Müller, R., Turner, R., 2007. The influence of project managers on project success criteria and project success by type of project. Eur. Manag. J. 25 (4), 298–309
[22] Pinto, J.K., Slevin, D.P., 1988. Project success: definitions and measurement techniques. Proj. Manag. J. 19 (1), 67–72
[23] Shenhar, A.J., Dvir, B., 1997. Mapping the dimensions of project success. Proj. Manag. J. 28 (2), 5–9
[24] Shenhar, A.J., Dvir, D., Levy, O., 1997. Mapping the Dimensions of Project Success. Proj. Manag. J. 28 (2), 5–13