Investigation of the Effect of Pressure Changes on the Gas Proportional Detector
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32807
Investigation of the Effect of Pressure Changes on the Gas Proportional Detector

Authors: S. M. Golgoun, S. M. Taheri

Abstract:

Investigation of radioactive contamination of personnel working in radiation centers to identify radioactive materials and then measure the potential contamination and eliminate it has always been considered. Various ways have been proposed to detect radiation so far and different detectors have been designed. A gas sealed proportional counter is one of these detectors which has special working conditions. In this research, a gas sealed detector of proportional counter type was made and then its various parameters were investigated. Some parameters are influential on their working conditions and one of these most important parameters is the internal pressure of the proportional gas-filled detector. In this experimental research, we produced software for examination and altering high voltage, registering data, and calculating efficiency of the detector. By this, we investigated different gas pressure effects on detector efficiency and proposed optimizing working conditions of this detector. After reviewing the results, we suggested a range between 20-30 mbar pressure for this gas sealed detector.

Keywords: Gas sealed detector, proportional detector, gas pressure measurement, counter.

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 271

References:


[1] F. Sauli, “Gaseous Radiation Detectors: Fundamentals and Applications,” Cambridge Monographs on Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology, Cambridge University Press, 2014.
[2] M. E. Shohani, A. Olfateh, S. M. Golgoun. M. Aminipour, A new method of gamma level gauge using a position-sensitive sensor with rod plastic scintillator, Measurement, 112648, 2023
[3] F. D. Amaro, C. M. B. Monteiro, J. M. F. dos Santos, et al. “Novel concept for neutron detection: proportional counter filled with 10B nanoparticle aerosol,” Sci Rep 7, 2017.
[4] S. M. Golgoun, D. Sardari, M. Sadeghi, et al., “Prediction of liquid density by gamma-ray measurement for materials with low atomic number,” MAPAN, vol. 35, 2020.
[5] S. M. Golgoun, “Innovative combined detector model for human bone densitometry,” Fifth International Conference on Physics, Mathematics and Basic Science Development, Tehran, 2022, https://civilica.com/doc/1402453/
[6] S. M. Golgoun, D. Sardari, M. Sadeghi, et al., “A novel method of combined detector model for gamma-ray densitometer: Theoretical calculation and MCNP4C simulation,” Appl. Radiat. Isot., vol. 118, 2016.
[7] E. Nazemi, M. Aminipour, A. Olfateh, et al., “Proposing an intelligent approach for measuring the thickness of metal sheets independent of alloy type,” Appl. Radiat. Isot., vol. 149, 2019.
[8] J. A. Posar, J. Davis, O. Brace, et al., “Characterization of a plastic dosimeter based on organic semiconductor photodiodes and scintillator,” Phys. Imaging Radiat. Oncol., vol. 14, 2020.
[9] M. Ebrahimi Shohani, S. M. Golgoun, M Aminipour, et al., “Geant4 comparative study of affecting different parameters on optical photons related to the plastic scintillation detector.” Journal of Physical Science and Application, vol. 7, 2017.
[10] M. Ebrahimi Shohani, S.M. Golgoun, M. Aminipour, et al., “Study and full simulation of ten different gases on sealed Multi-Wire Proportional Counter (MWPC) by using Garfield and Maxwell codes,” Appl. Radiat. Isot., vol. 115, 2016.
[11] J. Soltani-Nabipour, F. Sadeghi, “Design, fabrication and assessment of proportional counter in current and sealed gas mode,” JRNT, vol. 4, 2017.
[12] Y. N. Zhang, Q. Liu, H. B. Liu, et al., “Study of a sealed high gas pressure THGEM detector and response of alpha particle spectra,” Chinese Phys. C., vol. 41, 2017.
[13] J. Borbinha, Y. Romanets, P. Teles, et al., “Performance analysis of Geiger–Müller and cadmium zinc telluride sensors envisaging airborne radiological monitoring in NORM sites,” Sensors, vol. 20, 2020.
[14] P. Habrman, “Directional Geiger-Müller detector with improved response to gamma radiation,” J. Instrum., vol. 14, 2019.
[15] N. A. Graf, J. McCormick, “Physics and detector response simulations,” Phys. Procedia., vol. 37, 2012.
[16] M. E. Shohani, S. M. Taheri, S. M. Golgoun, Dynamic Fast Tracing and Smoothing Technique for Geiger-Muller Dosimeter, International Journal of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, vol. 17 (2023), publications.waset.org/10012875/pdf
[17] D. Barclay, Improved Response of Geiger Muller Detectors, IEEE Trans Nucl Sci, 33 (1986)
[18] G. Charpak, P. Benaben, P. Breuil, et al., “Detectors for alpha particles and x-rays operating in ambient air in pulse counting mode or/and with gas amplification,” J. Instrum., 2008.
[19] C. F. Hendee, S. Fine, W. B. Brown, “Gas‐flow proportional counter for soft x‐ray detection,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., vol. 27, 1956.
[20] A. G. Burn, X. Li, D. K. Haines, et al., “Improved sample preparation procedure for gross alpha counting on gas-flow proportional counter, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., vol. 325, 2020.
[21] E. Cuesta, R. L. Lozano, E.G. San Miguel, “Calibration of a low background gas-flow proportional counter to estimate 234Th activity in coastal waters,” Appl. Radiat. Isot., vol. 118, 2016.