Individuals’ Inner Wellbeing during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Quantitative Comparison of Social Connections and Close Relationships between the UK and India

Authors: Maria Spanoudaki, Pauldy C. J. Otermans, Dev Aditya

Abstract:

Relationships form an integral part of our everyday wellbeing. In this study, the focus is on Inner Wellbeing which can be described as an individuals' thoughts and feelings about what they can do and be. Relationships can come in many forms and can be divided into Social Connections (thoughts and feelings about the social network people can establish and rely on), and Close Relationships (thoughts and feeling about the emotional support people can receive from significant others or their close, intimate circle). The purpose of this study is to compare the Social Connections and Close Relationship dimensions of Inner Wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic between the UK and India. As part of the study, 392 participants in the UK and 205 participants India completed an online questionnaire using the Inner Wellbeing scale. Factor analyses showed that the construct of Inner Wellbeing can be described as one factor for the UK sample whereas it can be described as two factors (one focusing on positive items and one focusing on negative items) for the Indian sample. Results showed that during COVID-19, Social Connections were significantly different in the UK compared to India, whereas there is no significant difference for Close Relationships. The implications on relationships and wellbeing are discussed in detail.

Keywords: Social networks, relationship maintenance, relationship satisfaction, inner wellbeing.

References:

[1] Sharma, A. J., & Subramanyam, M. A. (2020). A cross-sectional study of psychological wellbeing of Indian adults during the COVID-19 lockdown: different strokes for different folks. PLoS One, 15(9), e0238761.
[2] Cultural Atlas. (2022). Core concepts. Retrieved from https://culturalatlas.sbs.com.au/british-culture/british-culture-core-concepts
[3] White, S. C., Gaines, S. O., & Jha, S. (2014). Inner wellbeing: Concept and validation of a new approach to subjective perceptions of wellbeing—India. Social indicators research, 119(2), 723-746.
[4] White, S. C. (2010). Analysing wellbeing: A framework for development practice. Development in Practice, 20(2), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520903564199.
[5] Nitschke, J. P., Forbes, P. A., Ali, N., Cutler, J., Apps, M. A., Lockwood, P. L., & Lamm, C. (2021). Resilience during uncertainty? Greater social connectedness during COVID‐19 lockdown is associated with reduced distress and fatigue. British Journal of Health Psychology, 26(2), 553-569.
[6] Roberts, K. (2020). Locked down leisure in Britain. Leisure Studies, 39(5), 617-628.
[7] Marinucci, M., Pancani, L., Aureli, N., & Riva, P. (2022). Online social connections as surrogates of face-to-face interactions: A longitudinal study under COVID-19 isolation. Computers in Human Behavior, 128, 107102.
[8] Brown, G., & Greenfield, P. M. (2021). Staying connected during stay‐at‐home: Communication with family and friends and its association with well‐being. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(1), 147-156.
[9] Halliday, E. C., Holt, V., Khan, K., Ward, F., Wheeler, P., & Sadler, G. (2021). ‘A lot of small things make a difference’. Mental health and strategies of coping during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Health Expectations, 25(2), 532-540.
[10] Li, W., Ornstein, K. A., Li, Y., & Liu, B. (2021). Barriers to learning a new technology to go online among older adults during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 69(11), 3051-3057.
[11] Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.
[12] Mayers, A. (2013). Introduction to statistics and SPSS in psychology. Pearson.
[13] Prati, G., & Mancini, A. D. (2021). The psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns: a review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies and natural experiments. Psychological medicine, 51(2), 201-211.