**Commenced**in January 2007

**Frequency:**Monthly

**Edition:**International

**Paper Count:**32718

##### Methodology for Quantifying the Meaning of Information in Biological Systems

**Authors:**
Richard L. Summers

**Abstract:**

The advanced computational analysis of biological systems is becoming increasingly dependent upon an understanding of the information-theoretic structure of the materials, energy and interactive processes that comprise those systems. The stability and survival of these living systems is fundamentally contingent upon their ability to acquire and process the meaning of information concerning the physical state of its biological continuum (biocontinuum). The drive for adaptive system reconciliation of a divergence from steady state within this biocontinuum can be described by an information metric-based formulation of the process for actionable knowledge acquisition that incorporates the axiomatic inference of Kullback-Leibler information minimization driven by survival replicator dynamics. If the mathematical expression of this process is the Lagrangian integrand for any change within the biocontinuum then it can also be considered as an action functional for the living system. In the direct method of Lyapunov, such a summarizing mathematical formulation of global system behavior based on the driving forces of energy currents and constraints within the system can serve as a platform for the analysis of stability. As the system evolves in time in response to biocontinuum perturbations, the summarizing function then conveys information about its overall stability. This stability information portends survival and therefore has absolute existential meaning for the living system. The first derivative of the Lyapunov energy information function will have a negative trajectory toward a system steady state if the driving force is dissipating. By contrast, system instability leading to system dissolution will have a positive trajectory. The direction and magnitude of the vector for the trajectory then serves as a quantifiable signature of the meaning associated with the living system’s stability information, homeostasis and survival potential.

**Keywords:**
Semiotic meaning,
Shannon information,
Lyapunov,
living systems.

**References:**

[1] Summers RL, 2020; Experiences in the Biocontinuum: A New Foundation for Living Systems. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, ISBN (10): 1-5275-5547-X, ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-5547-1

[2] McKay DM, 1972. Information, Mechanism and Meaning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

[3] Danesi M, 2007. The Quest for Meaning. A Guide to Semiotic Theory and Practice. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press

[4] Shannon C, 1948. A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell System Tech. J. 27, 379–423

[5] Hoffmeyer J, 2009. Biosemiotics: An Examination into the Signs of Life and the Life of Sign. Scranton, PA: University of Scranton Press

[6] Volkenstein MV, 1994. Physical Approaches to Biological Evolution. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag

[7] Bateson G, 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York, New York:Ballantine Books

[8] Peirce CS, 1931-1935. Collected Papers, Volume 1-6. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

[9] Stonier T, 1997. Information and Meaning: An Evolutionary Perspective. New York, NY: Springer Verlag

[10] Juarrero A, 1999. Dynamics in Action: Intentional Behavior as a Complex System. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

[11] Friston K, 2010. “The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?” Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 11:12738

[12] Harper M, 2009. The replicator equation as an inference dynamic. arXiv:0911.1763.

[13] Harper M, 2009. Information geometry and evolutionary game theory. arXiv:0911.1383.

[14] Baez JC, Pollard BS. 2016, Relative Entropy in Biological Systems. Entropy 18(2): 46-52.

[15] Kullback S, 1968. Information Theory and Statistics. Dover, New York

[16] Fisher R, 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK

[17] Summers RL, 2021. An Action Principle for Biological Systems. J Phys: Conf. Ser. 2090 012109

[18] Kaila VRI, Arto A, 2008. Natural selection for least action Proc. R. Soc. A.4643055–3070http://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2008.0178

[19] Samuelson PA, 1974. A Biological Least-Action Principle for the Ecological Model of Volterra-Lotka. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Aug 1974. 71(8) 3041-3044.

[20] Karev G, 2010 Replicator Equations and the Principle of Minimal Production of Information. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology.72:1124-42. 10.1007/s11538-009-9484-9.

[21] Caticha A, 2015. Entropic Dynamics. Entropy 17, 6110-6128

[22] Cafaro C, 2008. The Information Geometry of Chaos. Riga, Latvia: VDM Verlag Dr. Mueller

[23] Lyapunov A, 1892, 1992. The General Problem of Stability of Motion. International Journal of Control, No. 55(3): 531-773. Transl. Davaux, E., Fuller, A.T.

[24] Ho Mae-Wan, 1998. The Rainbow and the Worm, the Physics of Organisms. River Edge, NJ: World Scientific. ISBN 981-02-4813-X

[25] Kauffman S, 2000. Investigations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0199728941

[26] Guyton AC, Jones CE, Coleman TG, 1973. Circulatory Physiology: cardiac output and its regulation, second edition Philadelphia: WB Saunders.