Digital Homeostasis: Tangible Computing as a Multi-Sensory Installation
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32807
Digital Homeostasis: Tangible Computing as a Multi-Sensory Installation

Authors: Andrea Macruz

Abstract:

This paper explores computation as a process for design by examining how computers can become more than an operative strategy in a designer's toolkit. It documents this, building upon concepts of neuroscience and Antonio Damasio's Homeostasis Theory, which is the control of bodily states through feedback intended to keep conditions favorable for life. To do this, it follows a methodology through algorithmic drawing and discusses the outcomes of three multi-sensory design installations, which culminated from a course in an academic setting. It explains both the studio process that took place to create the installations and the computational process that was developed, related to the fields of algorithmic design and tangible computing. It discusses how designers can use computational range to achieve homeostasis related to sensory data in a multi-sensory installation. The outcomes show clearly how people and computers interact with different sensory modalities and affordances. They propose using computers as meta-physical stabilizers rather than tools.

Keywords: Antonio Damasio, emotional feedback, algorithmic drawing, homeostasis, multi-sensory installation, neuroscience.

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 293

References:


[1] A. Damasio, Feeling & Knowing: Making Mind Conscious. New York: Patheon Books, 2021.
[2] A. Damasio, The Strange Order of Things: Life, Feeling, and the Making of Cultures. New York: Random House Inc., 2018.
[3] A. Damasio, Self Comes to Mind. New York: Pantheon, 2010.
[4] A. Damasio, USCDornsife: College of Letters, Arts and Sciences. Retrieved May 15, 2022, from https://dornsife.usc.edu
[5] G. E. Billman, “Homeostasis: The Underappreciated and Far Too Often Ignored Central Organizing Principle of Physiology,” Front. Physiol., vol. 11:200, Mar. 2020.
[6] C. Bernard, Leçons sur les phénomènes de la vie communs aux animaux et aux végétaux. Montana: Kessinger Publishing, 2010.
[7] W. B. Cannon, “Organization for physiological homeostasis,” Physiol. Rev., vol. 9, pp. 399–431, Jul. 1929.
[8] Hippocrates, Heracleitus, Jones W.H.S. Jones, Volume IV: Nature of Man. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1931.
[9] W. B. Cannon, The Wisdom of The Body. New York: Norton & Company, 1963.
[10] M. E. Kotas, R. Medzhitov, “Homeostasis, inflammation, and disease susceptibility”, Cell, 160(5), pp. 816–827, 2015.
[11] A. Damasio, H. Damasio, “Exploring the concept of homeostasis and considering its implications for economics.”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 126, part B, pp. 125-129, 2016.
[12] A. Damasio, G. B. Carvalho, “The nature of feelings: evolutionary and neurobiological origins,” Nat Rev Neurosci., vol. 14, pp. 143–152, Jan. 2013.
[13] A. Damasio, The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. New York: Harcourt, 2000.
[14] A. Damasio, T. J. Grabowski, A. Bechara, H. Damasio, L. B. Porto, J. Parvizi, R.D. Hichwa, “Subcortical and cortical brain activity during the feeling of self-generated emotions”, Nat Neurosci 3, pp. 1049–1056, 2000.
[15] M. Farr, A. Macruz, “Multi-sensory Materiality - Expanding Human Experience and Material Potentials with Advanced HoloLens Technologies and Emotion Sensing Wearables (Published Conference Proceedings style),” in Proc. 25th CAADRIA Conf., Bangkok, 2020, pp.721-730.
[16] K. Suzuki, S. N. Garfinkel, H. D. Critchley, A. K. Seth, “Multi-sensory integration across exteroceptive and interoceptive domains modulates self-experience in the rubber-hand illusion”, Neuropsychologia, Vol 51, Issue 13, pp. 2909-2917, 2013.
[17] Spatial, The Metaverse for Experiences. Retrieved May 15, 2022, from https://spatial.io/.