Post-Modernist Tragi-Comedy: A Study of Tom Stoppard’s Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead

Authors: Azza Taha Zaki

Abstract:

The death of tragedy is probably one of the most distinctive literary controversies of the twentieth century. There is common critical consent that tragedy in the classical sense of the word is no longer possible. Thinkers, philosophers and critics such as Nietzsche, Durrenmatt and George Steiner have all agreed that the decline of the genre in the modern age is due to the total lack of a unified world image and the absence of a shared vision in a fragmented and ideologically diversified world. The production of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead in 1967 marked the rise of the genre of tragi-comedy as a more appropriate reflection of the spirit of the age. At the hands of such great dramatists as Tom Stoppard (1937- ), the revived genre was not used as an extra comic element to give some comic relief to an otherwise tragic text, but it was given a postmodernist touch to serve the interpretation of the dilemma of man in the postmodernist world. This paper will study features of postmodernist tragi-comedy in Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead as one of the most important plays in the modern British theatre and investigate Stoppard’s vision of man and life as influenced by postmodernist thought and philosophy.

Keywords: British, drama, postmodernist, Stoppard, tragi-comedy.

References:

[1] G. Steiner, The Death of Tragedy, London, Faber and Faber, 1963.
[2] G. Brereton, Principles of Tragedy: A Rational Examination of the Tragic Concept in Life and Literature, University of Miami Press, 1968, P.270.
[3] J. L. Styan, The Dark Comedy: The Development of Modern Comic Tragedy, Cambridge, 1968, p. 37.
[4] Quoted by K. S. Guthke, Modern Tragicomedy: An Investigation into the Nature of the Genre, New York, 1966, P. 131.
[5] R. Hingley, “Introduction”, The Oxford Chekov, Vol. III, London, 1968, P.4.
[6] A. Nicoll, World Drama from Aeschylus to Anouilh, California: Harcourt Brace, 1950, P. 837.
[7] D. Hirst, Tragicomedy, London: Routledge, 1984, P.120.
[8] M. T. Herrick, Tragicomedy: Its Origin and Development in Italy, France and England, University of Illinois Press, 1955, P. 313.
[9] J. Orr, Tragicomedy and Contemporary Culture: Play and Performance from Beckett to Shepard, London: Macmillan, 1991, P. 1.
[10] J. Fleming, Stoppard’s Theatre: Finding Order Amid Chaos, Texas: University of Texas Press, 2001, P. 48.
[11] All quotations from the play are from T. Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead, London: Faber and Faber, 1968.
[12] R. A. Cave, New British Drama in Performance on the London Stage: 1970 to 1985, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1987, P.72.
[13] J. Schlueter, Metafictional Characters in Modern Drama, Columbia: Columbia University Press 1979, P. 90.
[14] “Black humor: To weep with laughing” in Comedy: New Perspectives, vol. VI, M. Charney, Ed. New York, 1979, P. 39.
[15] “Tomfoolery: Stoppard’s Theatrical Puns”, H. Zeifman, Yearbook of English Studies, vol. 9, No. 1, 1979, P. 206.,
[16] Quoted in A. R. White, G. E. Moore: A Critical Exposition, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1958, P. 25.
[17] C. Butler, Postmodernism: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, P. 9.
[18] N. Hooti and S. Shooshtarian, “A Postmodernist Reading of Tom Stoppard’s “Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead”, Studies in Literature and Language, vol. 2, No. 1, 2011, P. 158.
[19] F. Nietzsche, The Gay Science, Leipzig, E. W. Fritzsch, 1887, p. 181. Published at https://web.stanford.edu/~jsabol/existentialism/materials/nietzsche-gay-science-hurry.pdf
[20] R. Chartier, The Cultural Uses of Print in Early Modern France, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1987, P. 89.