Evaluating the Small-Strain Mechanical Properties of Cement-Treated Clayey Soils Based on the Confining Pressure
Authors: M. A. Putera, N. Yasufuku, A. Alowaisy, R. Ishikura, J. G. Hussary, A. Rifa’i
Abstract:
Indonesia’s government has planned a project for a high-speed railway connecting the capital cities, Jakarta and Surabaya, about 700 km. Based on that location, it has been planning construction above the lowland soil region. The lowland soil region comprises cohesive soil with high water content and high compressibility index, which in fact, led to a settlement problem. Among the variety of railway track structures, the adoption of the ballastless track was used effectively to reduce the settlement; it provided a lightweight structure and minimized workspace. Contradictorily, deploying this thin layer structure above the lowland area was compensated with several problems, such as lack of bearing capacity and deflection behavior during traffic loading. It is necessary to combine with ground improvement to assure a settlement behavior on the clayey soil. Reflecting on the assurance of strength increment and working period, those were convinced by adopting methods such as cement-treated soil as the substructure of railway track. Particularly, evaluating mechanical properties in the field has been well known by using the plate load test and cone penetration test. However, observing an increment of mechanical properties has uncertainty, especially for evaluating cement-treated soil on the substructure. The current quality control of cement-treated soils was established by laboratory tests. Moreover, using small strain devices measurement in the laboratory can predict more reliable results that are identical to field measurement tests. Aims of this research are to show an intercorrelation of confining pressure with the initial condition of the Young’s modulus (E0), Poisson ratio (υ0) and Shear modulus (G0) within small strain ranges. Furthermore, discrepancies between those parameters were also investigated. Experimental result confirmed the intercorrelation between cement content and confining pressure with a power function. In addition, higher cement ratios have discrepancies, conversely with low mixing ratios.
Keywords: Cement content, confining pressure, high-speed railway, small strain ranges.
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 425References:
[1] JETRO, “Study on the high speed railway project (Jakarta-Bandung section), republic of Indonesia,” Yachiyo Engineering Co., Ltd. and Japan International Consultants for Transportation Co., Ltd., Final report (Summary), Nov. 2012.
[2] E. V. Ranst, S. R. Utami, J. Vanderdeelen, and J. Shamshuddin, “Surface reactivity of Andisols on volcanic ash along the Sunda arc crossing Java Island, Indonesia,” Geoderma, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 193–203, 2004.
[3] F. Novico et al., “Impact of Late Quaternary climatic fluctuations on coastal systems: Evidence from high-resolution geophysical, sedimentological and geochronological data from the Java Island,” Marine and Petroleum Geology, vol. 136, p. 105399, 2022.
[4] K. Onyelowe, D. B. Van, C. Igboayaka, F. Orji, and H. Ugwuanyi, “Rheology of mechanical properties of soft soil and stabilization protocols in the developing countries-Nigeria,” Materials Science for Energy Technologies, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 8–14, 2019.
[5] H. Solihu, “Cement Soil Stabilization as an Improvement Technique for Rail Track Subgrade, and Highway Subbase and Base Courses: A Review,” Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, vol. 10:3, 2020.
[6] P. Kumar and V. Singh, Geotechnical Aspect for Design of Track Formation System for High Speed Rail Lines on Alluvial Soil Deposited-A Review. 2017.
[7] G. Kang, “Influence and Control Strategy for Local Settlement for High-Speed Railway Infrastructure,” Engineering, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 374–379, 2016.
[8] H. Xiao, K. Yao, Y. Liu, S.-H. Goh, and F.-H. Lee, “Bender element measurement of small strain shear modulus of cement-treated marine clay – Effect of test setup and methodology,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 172, pp. 433–447, May 2018.
[9] J. Atkinson, “Non-linear soil stiffness in routine design,” Geotechnique, vol. 50, pp. 487–508, Jan. 2000.
[10] P. Subramaniam and S. Banerjee, “Factors affecting shear modulus degradation of cement treated clay,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 65, pp. 181–188, 2014.
[11] P. J. Vardanega and M. D. Bolton, “Stiffness of Clays and Silts: Modeling Considerations,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, vol. 140, no. 6, Jun. 2014.
[12] G. Kang, T. Tsuchida, and Y. Kim, “Strength and stiffness of cement-treated marine dredged clay at various curing stages,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 132, pp. 71–84, 2017.
[13] K. Kasama, K. Zen, and K. Iwataki, “Undrained Shear Strength of Cement-Treated Soils,” Soils and Foundations, vol. 46, pp. 221–232, Apr. 2006.
[14] M. Kitazume and M. Terashi, “The deep mixing method,” in The deep mixing method, Leiden, The Netherlands: CRC Press/Balkema, 2013.
[15] K. Kasama, H. Ochiai, and N. Yasufuku, “On the Stress-Strain Behaviour of Lightly Cemented Clay Based on an Extended Critical State Concept,” Soils and Foundations, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 37–47, 2000.
[16] M. A. Putera, N. Yasufuku, A. Alowaisy, and A. Rifai, “Optimizing modified triaxial testing for small strain zone using local displacement transducers and bender element for cement-treated soft soil,” E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 331, 2021.
[17] Japanese Geotechnical Society Standards, “Laboratory testing standards of geomaterial,” The Japanese Geotechnical Society, vol. 1, 2015.