Study on the Seismic Response of Slope under Pulse-Like Ground Motion

Authors: Peter Antwi Buah, Yingbin Zhang, Jianxian He, Chenlin Xiang, Delali Atsu Y. Bakah

Abstract:

Near-fault ground motions with velocity pulses are considered to cause significant damage to structures or slopes compared to ordinary ground motions without velocity pulses. The double pulsed pulse-like ground motion is well known to be stronger than the single pulse. This research has numerically justified this perspective by studying the dynamic response of a homogeneous rock slope subjected to four pulse-like and two non-pulse-like ground motions using the Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua in 3 Dimensions (FLAC3D) software. Two of the pulse-like ground motions just have a single pulse. The results show that near-fault ground motions with velocity pulses can cause a higher dynamic response than regular ground motions. The amplification of the peak ground acceleration (PGA) in horizontal direction increases with the increase of the slope elevation. The seismic response of the slope under double pulse ground motion is stronger than that of the single pulse ground motion. The PGV amplification factor under the effect of the non-pulse-like records is also smaller than those under the pulse-like records. The velocity pulse strengthens the earthquake damage to the slope, which results in producing a stronger dynamic response.

Keywords: Velocity pulses, dynamic response, PGV magnification effect, elevation effect, double pulse.

References:

[1] K. C. Tsai, C. P. Hsiao, and M. Bruneau, “Overview of building damages in 921 Chi-Chi earthquake,” Earthq. Eng. Eng. Seismol. vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 93–108, 2000.
[2] Y. Yin, F. Wang, and P. Sun, “Landslide hazards triggered by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, Sichuan, China,” Landslides, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 139–152, 2009.
[3] R. Hamilton, “United Nations International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction Idndr Early Warning Programme, Geneva October 1997 Early Warning Capabilities for Geological Hazards,” Landslides, No. October, 1997.
[4] G. M. Harris and A. P. Beardow, “The destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah: a geotechnical perspective,” Q. J. Eng. Geol., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 349–362, 1995.
[5] H. Bin Wang and K. Sassa, “Rainfall-induced landslide hazard assessment using artificial neural networks,” Earth Surf. Process. Landforms, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 235–247, 2006.
[6] E. M. Rathje and G. Antonakos, “A unified model for predicting earthquake-induced sliding displacements of rigid and flexible slopes,” Eng. Geol., vol. 122, no. 1–2, pp. 51–60, 2011.
[7] R. Sehhati, A. Rodriguez-Marek, M. El Gawady, and W. F. Cofer, “Effects of near-fault ground motions and equivalent pulses on multi-story structures,” Eng. Struct., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 767–779, 2011.
[8] H. Y. Tsai, C. C. Tsai, and W. C. Chang, “Slope unit-based approach for assessing regional seismic landslide displacement for deep and shallow failure,” Eng. Geol., vol. 248, no. January 2018, pp. 124–139, 2019.
[9] S. Adanur, A. C. Altunişik, A. Bayraktar, and M. Akköse, “Comparison of near-fault and far-fault ground motion effects on geometrically nonlinear earthquake behavior of suspension bridges,” Nat. Hazards, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 593–614, 2012.
[10] M. Kohrangi, D. Vamvatsikos, and P. Bazzurro, “Pulse-like versus non-pulse-like ground motion records: Spectral shape comparisons and record selection strategies,” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 46–64, 2019.
[11] A. Elenas and K. Meskouris, “Correlation study between seismic acceleration parameters and damage indices of structures,” Eng. Struct., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 698–704, 2001.
[12] C. Champion and A. Liel, “The effect of near-fault directivity on building seismic collapse risk,” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 1391–1409, 2012.
[13] R. Hack, D. Alkema, G. A. M. Kruse, N. Leenders, and L. Luzi, “Influence of earthquakes on the stability of slopes,” Eng. Geol., vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 4–15, 2007.
[14] W. S. Zhao and W. Z. Chen, “Effect of near-fault ground motions with long-period pulses on the tunnel,” J. Vibro-engineering, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 841–858, 2015.
[15] E. Kalkan and S. K. Kunnath, “Effects of fling step and forward directivity on seismic response of buildings,” Earthq. Spectra, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 367–390, 2006.
[16] G. P. Mavroeidis and A. S. Papageorgiou, “A mathematical representation of near-fault ground motions,” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 1099–1131, 2003.
[17] S. Zhang and G. Wang, “Effects of near-fault and far-fault ground motions on nonlinear dynamic response and seismic damage of concrete gravity dams,” Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., vol. 53, pp. 217–229, 2013.
[18] I. Chowdhury and S. P. Dasgupta, “Computation of Rayleigh damping coefficients for large systems,” Electron. J. Geotech. Eng., vol. 8 C, 2003.
[19] Y. Zhou, F. Zhang, J. Wang, Y. Gao, and G. Dai, “Seismic stability of earth slopes with tension crack,” Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 950–964, 2019.
[20] D. Song, Z. Chen, L. Dong, and W. Zhu, “Numerical investigation on dynamic response characteristics and deformation mechanism of a bedded rock mass slope subject to earthquake excitation,” Appl. Sci., vol. 11, no. 15, 2021.
[21] M. Guo, X. Ge, and S. Wang, “Slope stability analysis under seismic load by vector sum analysis method,” J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 282–288, 2011.