Theory about the Gebel El-Arak Knife: An Egyptian Knife with Canaanite Relief

Authors: Doaa El-Shereef

Abstract:

Gebel Al-Arak knife with its fine engravings on the two faces of the handle is the proof about the relationship between the Egyptians and the Canaanites during Naqada II. The Canaanites lived with the Egyptians in Abydos and they fought each other for power and the war scene on the knife prove that the Canaanites and the Egyptians wore the same outfit and they are only different by their hair style. The research discusses and analyzes many primary sources in Egypt, like wall inscriptions and palettes that prove the strong land relation and sea trade between Canaan and Egypt during Chalcolithic Age (4500-3500 BC). While no primary sources in Egypt prove the relationship between Egypt and Mesopotamia in the period to which the knife of Gebel Al-Arak belongs, between 3300-3100 BC, there were no battles or maritime trade exchanges between them. The engravings on the knife belong to the Canaanites and their God El (Master of Animals) and describing their victory over the Egyptians in this amphibious battle. The research aims to prove a theory that the Gebel Al-Arak knife is an Egyptian-made knife and the influences of the knife engravings were Canaanite, not Mesopotamian. The methodology of the study is historical methodology which is used to gather and analyze evidence and various historical data retrieved from history and interpret what the evidence reveals about things that occurred in history.

Keywords: Canaan, Egypt, Gebel el-Arak Knife, Louvre.

References:

[1] Michael W. Dee, David Wengrow, Andrew J. Shortland, Alice Stevenson, Fiona Brock, Christopher Bronk Ramsey. “Radiocarbon dating and the Naqada relative chronology”. Journal of Archaeological Science, Volume 46, June 2014, pp. 319-323.
[2] Petrie, William Matthew Flinders. Diospolis Parva: The Cemeteries of Abadiyeh and Hu. Egypt Exploration Fund, 1898 – 1899. P. 67.
[3] Hendrickx, Stan. The relative chronology of the Naqada culture: Problems and possibilities (in:) Spencer, A.J. (ed.), Aspects of Early Egypt. London: British Museum Press, 1996. Pp. 36-69".
[4] Campagno, M. 2002. On the Predynastic “proto-states” of Upper Egypt. Gdttinger Miszellen 188: 49-60.
[5] Ulrich, Hartung. Some remarks on the chronological position of the Predynastic settlement at Maadi (Egypt) and its relations to the Southern Levant. In: Paléorient, 2013, vol. 39, n°1. The Transition Late Chalcolithic to Early Bronze Age in the Southern Levant. pp. 177-191.
[6] Brunton, Guy; Caton-Thompson, Gertrude. The Badarian Civilisation and Predynastic Remains near Badari. London: Bernard Quaritch. 1928.
[7] Skarzynski, Elizabeth. “Beyond Prestige: A ritual production model for stone tool specialization in Naqada period Egypt”, PhD thesis, Graduate Faculty, University of Virginia, USA. 2017.
[8] Gover, Andrea. The Lithic tool economy in Upper Egypt in the Late Predynastic: The Naqada II proliferation of fine flint tools and its implications for socioeconomic complexity. Prepared for: Topical Seminar in Early and Historic States. Fall 2016.
[9] Levy, Thomas Evan. "Cult, Metallurgy and Rank Societies - Chalcolithic Period (Ca. 4500 - 3500 BCE)." Levy, Thomas Evan. The Archaeology of society in the Holy Land. London: Leicester University Press, 1995. pp. 226-244.
[10] Petrie, William Matthew Flinders. Illahun, Kahun and Gurob. London: William Clowes and Sons. 1891.
[11] Jenkins, Nancy. The Boat Beneath the Pyramid - King Cheops' Royal Ship. London: Thames and Hudson Ltd. 1980.
[12] Budka, Julia. Die Annalen Amenemhets II. Ein neues Zeugnis für ägyptische Aktivitäten in der Levante zur Zeit des Mittleren Reiches. Berlin 2000, S. 12–13.
[13] ISIDA Project. The Pyramid of Unas. April 2019. .
[14] Vertesalji, Peter Paul, et al. "Le Manche De Couteau De Gebel El-ʻArak Dans Le Contexte Des Relations Entre La Mésopotamie Et L'Egypte." La Circulation Des Biens, Des Personnes Et Des Idées Dans Le Proche-Orient Ancien, 1992, pp. 29-41.
[15] Pittman, Holly. “Constructing Context: The Gebel El-Arak Knife: Greater Mesopotamian and Egyptian Interaction in the Late Fourth Millennium B. C. E.” The Study of the Ancient Near East in the Twenty-first Century, 1996, pp. 9-32.
[16] Cooper, Jerrol S. “The Study of the Ancient Near East in the Twenty-first Century”: The William Foxwell Albright Centennial Conference. Eisenbrauns, 1996, pp. 10–14.
[17] Basch, Lucien. Le «bateau-boomerang» prédynastique et labarque divine pharaonique. Archaeonautica. 6 December 2018. Pp. 143-149.
[18] Yon, Marguerite; Sauvage, Caroline. La navigation en Méditerranée orientale à l’Âge du Bronze Récent. Nehet, revue numérique d'égyptologie, Paris-Sorbonne, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 2015, Entre Nil et mers, La navigation en Égypte ancienne, Actes des Rencontres de Provence Egyptologie, Musée d’Arles antique, le 12 avril 2014.
[19] Davies, Norman de Garis, and Raymond Oliver Faulkner. 1947. A Syrian Trading Venture in Egypt. Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 33: 40–6, pl. VIII.
[20] Petrie, William Matthew Flinders. Ceremonial Slate Palettes - Corpus of Proto-Dynastic Pottery. London: The British School of Egyptian Archaeology (University College London), 1953.
[21] Hinks, Roger. The Master of Animals. Journal of the Warburg Institute, Vol. 1, No. 4 (Apr., 1938), pp. 263-265.
[22] Petrie, William Matthew Flinders; Spanton, W.D.; Davies, N. de G. Ancient Egypt - Part 1. London: Macmillan and Co., 1917.
[23] Charles, Virolleaud. La naissance des dieux gracieux et beaux. Poème phénicien de Ras Shamra. In: Syria. Tome 14 fascicule 2, 1933. pp. 128-151.
[24] The Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature. The death of Ur-Namma (Ur-Namma A): translation. .