Public-Private Partnership Transportation Projects: An Exploratory Study

Authors: Medya Fathi

Abstract:

When public transportation projects were delivered through design-bid-build and later design-build, governments found a serious issue: inadequate funding. With population growth, governments began to develop new arrangements in which the private sectors were involved to cut the financial burden. This arrangement, Public-Private Partnership (PPP), has its own risks; however, performance outputs can motivate or discourage its use. On top of such output are time and budget, which can be affected by the type of project delivery methods. Project completion within or ahead of schedule as well as within or under budget is among any owner’s objectives. With a higher application of PPP in the highway industry in the US and insufficient research, the current study addresses the schedule and cost performance of PPP highway projects and determines which one outperforms the other. To meet this objective, after collecting performance data of all PPP projects, schedule growth and cost growth are calculated, and finally, statistical analysis is conducted to evaluate the PPP performance. The results show that PPP highway projects on average have saved time and cost; however, the main benefit is a faster delivery rather than an under-budget completion. This study can provide better insights to understand PPP highways’ performance and assist practitioners in applying PPP for transportation projects with the opportunity to save time and cost.

Keywords: Cost, delivery method, highway, public-private partnership, schedule, transportation.

References:

[1] Ibbs, W., Kwak, Y., Ng, T., and Odabasi, A. (2003). “Project delivery systems and project change: Quantitative analysis.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 129(4), 382–387.
[2] ASCE. 2017. The ASCE 2017 Infrastructure Report Card: A Comprehensive Assessment of America's Infrastructure. Washington, DC: American Society of Civil Engineers. https://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Full-2017-Report-CardFINAL.pdf.
[3] Li, S., Abraham, D., and Cai, H. (2017). Infrastructure financing with project bond and credit default swap under public-private partnerships. International Journal of Project Management, 35(3), 406-419.
[4] MacDonald, M. (2002). Review of large public procurement in the UK. HM Treasury, London.
[5] Australia, I. P. (2007). Performance of PPPs and traditional procurement in Australia. Sydney, 2007, Access on July 2021 < http://infrastructure.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/IPA_PPP_FINAL.pdf>
[6] Raisbeck, P., Duffield, C., and Xu, M. (2010). Comparative performance of PPPs and traditional procurement in Australia. Construction management and economics, 28(4), 345-359.
[7] Bain, R. 2010. “Construction risk–What risk?” In Project finance international, 46–50. New York: Thomas Reuters.
[8] Chasey, A. D., Maddex, W. E., and Bansal, A. (2012). Comparison of public–private partnerships and traditional procurement methods in North American highway construction. Transportation research record, 2268(1), 26-32.
[9] Ramsey, D. W., and El Asmar, M. (2015). Cost and Schedule Performance Benchmarks of US Transportation Public-Private Partnership Projects: Preliminary Results. Transportation Research Record, 2504(1), 58-65.
[10] Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2007). “Case Studies of Transportation Public-Private Partnerships around the World.” 〈https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ipd/pdfs/p3/int_ppp_case_studies_final_report_7-7-07.pdf〉.
[11] Gransberg, D. D., Runde, D. F., and James, S. (2000). The effect of innovative highway construction contract methods. AACE International Transactions, P2A.
[12] Wang, Y., and Zhao, Z. J. (2018). Performance of public–private partnerships and the influence of contractual arrangements. Public Performance & Management Review, 41(1), 177-200.
[13] Maslak, K., and Franz, B. (1990, January). Exploring the Growth of Public-Private Partnerships by Examining Enabling Legislation. In Construction Research Congress 2018 (pp. 95-104).
[14] Public works Financing, 2016. Available at https://azdot.gov/sites/default/files/2019/08/p3-pwf-feb-2016.pdf
[15] Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2021). “Types of Public-Private Partnerships.” 〈https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ipd/fact_sheets/p3_options.aspx〉.
[16] Fathi, M. (2020). Public-Private Partnership Contract Framework Development and Project Performance Analysis Compared to Design-Build in the US Highway Projects (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada, Las Vegas).
[17] Park, H. S., Lee, D., Kim, S., and Kim, J. L. (2015). Comparing project performance of design-build and design-bid-build methods for large-sized public apartment housing projects in Korea. Journal of Asian architecture and building engineering, 14(2), 323-330.
[18] Engineering News Record (ENR) (2022). Construction Cost Index. Access on January 10, 2022. < https://www.enr.com/economics/historical_indices>
[19] Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) (2022). National Highway Construction Cost Index. Access on January 10, 2022. < https://www.bts.gov/content/national-highway-construction-cost-index-nhcci>