Online Think–Pair–Share in a Third-Age ICT Course
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32799
Online Think–Pair–Share in a Third-Age ICT Course

Authors: Daniele Traversaro

Abstract:

Problem: Senior citizens have been facing a challenging reality as a result of strict public health measures designed to protect people from the COVID-19 outbreak. These include the risk of social isolation due to the inability of the elderly to integrate with technology. Never before have Information and Communication Technology (ICT) skills become essential for their everyday life. Although third-age ICT education and lifelong learning are widely supported by universities and governments, there is a lack of literature on which teaching strategy/methodology to adopt in an entirely online ICT course aimed at third-age learners. This contribution aims to present an application of the Think-Pair-Share (TPS) learning method in an ICT third-age virtual classroom with an intergenerational approach to conducting online group labs and review activities. Research Question: Is collaborative learning suitable and effective, in terms of student engagement and learning outcomes, in an online ICT course for the elderly? Methods: In the TPS strategy a problem is posed by the teacher, students have time to think about it individually, and then they work in pairs (or small groups) to solve the problem and share their ideas with the entire class. We performed four experiments in the ICT course of the University of the Third Age of Genova (University of Genova, Italy) on the Microsoft Teams platform. The study cohort consisted of 26 students over the age of 45. Data were collected through online questionnaires. Two have been proposed, one at the end of the first activity and another at the end of the course. They consisted of five and three close-ended questions, respectively. The answers were on a Likert scale (from 1 to 4) except two questions (which asked the number of correct answers given individually and in groups) and the field for free comments/suggestions. Results: Groups achieve better results than individual students (with scores greater than one order of magnitude) and most students found TPS helpful to work in groups and interact with their peers. Insights: From these early results, it appears that TPS is suitable for an online third-age ICT classroom and useful for promoting discussion and active learning. Despite this, our work has several limitations. First of all, the results highlight the need for more data to be able to perform a statistical analysis in order to determine the effectiveness of this methodology in terms of student engagement and learning outcomes as future direction.

Keywords: Collaborative learning, information technology education, lifelong learning, older adult education, think-pair-share.

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 557

References:


[1] Mattia Cattaneo, Paolo Malighetti, and Daniele Spinelli. 2016. The impact of University of the Third Age courses on ICT adoption. Comput. Hum. Behav. 63, C (October 2016), 613–619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.087.
[2] Oliveira, Rita de Cássia da Silva and Scortegagna, Paola Andressa. Universidad Abierta a las Personas Adultas Mayores: Espacio de Pedagogía Social, Educación y Empoderamiento. Rev. Actual. Investig. Educ (online). 2015, vol.15, n.3, pp.505-522. ISSN 1409-4703
[3] Patterson, Rebecca & Moffatt, Suzanne & Smith, Maureen & Scott, Jessica & Mcloughlin, Christopher & Bell, Judith & Bell, Norman. (2016). Exploring social inclusivity within the University of the Third Age (U3A): a model of collaborative research. Ageing and Society. 36. 1580-1603. 10.1017/S0144686X15000550.
[4] U3A: https://www.u3a.org.uk
[5] “AI U3A | The Origin and Purpose of the University of the Third Age.” AI U3A, AI U3A, www.aiu3a.com/origin-and-purpose Accessed 6 May 2021.
[6] Comparative Study - Inclusive Senior Education Through Virtual U3A (No. 2017–1-CZ01-KA204-035438). (2020, February). Pavla Janoschová.https://epale.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/isev-comparative_study.pdf
[7] Fondazione Mondo Digitale: https://mondodigitale.org/it
[8] Kothiyal, Aditi & Majumdar, Rwitajit & Murthy, Sahana & Iyer, Sridhar. (2013). Effect of think-pair-share in a large CS1 class: 83% sustained engagement. ICER 2013 - Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research. 137-144. 10.1145/2493394.2493408.
[9] Jacobs, George M.. Collaborative Learning or Cooperative Learning? The Name Is Not Important; Flexibility Is. Beyond Words, (S.l.), v. 3, n. 1, p. 32-52, june 2015. ISSN 2338-6339. Available at: . Date accessed: 07 may 2021. doi:https://doi.org/10.33508/bw.v3i1.676. .
[10] Jordine K., Wilson DM., Sakpal R. (2013) What Is Age’s Affect in Collaborative Learning Environments?. In: Stephanidis C., Antona M. (eds) Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. User and Context Diversity. UAHCI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8010. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39191-0_11
[11] University of Genova, UniTE: https://unite.unige.it