Developing Research Involving Different Species: Opportunities and Empirical Foundations

Authors: A. V. Varfolomeeva, N. S. Tkachenko, A. G. Tishchenko

Abstract:

In this study, we addressed the problem of weak validity, implausible results, and inaccurate reporting in psychological research on different species. The theoretical basis of the study was the systems-evolutionary approach (SEA). We assumed that the root of the problem is the values and attitudes of the researchers (in particular anthropomorphism and anthropocentrism). The first aim of the study was the formulation of a research design that avoids this problem. Based on a literature review, we concluded that such design, amongst other things, should include methodics with playful components. The second aim was to conduct a series of studies on the differences in the formation of instrumental skill in rats raised and housed in different environments. As a result, we revealed that there are contradictions between some of the statements of SEA, so that it is not possible to choose one of the alternative hypotheses. We suggested that in order to get out of this problem, it is necessary to modify these provisions by aligning them with the attitude of multicentrism.

Keywords: epistemological attitudes, experimental design, validity, psychological structure, learning

References:

[1] T. Wesołowski, “Faulty Practices in field biology – what should be done?” Forest Biology, pp. 1–7, Sept. 2012.
[2] C. E. Webb, P. Woodford, E. Huchard, “Animal Ethics and Behavioral Science: An Overdue Discussion,” BioScience, 69, pp. 778–788, 10 Aug. 2019.
[3] C. E. Webb, P. Woodford, E. Huchard, “The Study That Made Rats Jump for Joy, and Then Killed Them,” BioEssays, 42, pp. 1–2, Apr. 2020.
[4] B. Franks, C. Webb, M. Gagliano, B. Smuts, “Conventional science will not do justice to nonhuman interests: A fresh approach is required,” Animal Sentience, 4(27), 2020.
[5] M. A. Kholodnaya, “Professional illusions as a consequence of simplified conceptions of human intelligence,” Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 1(4), Dec. 2004.
[6] P. Jemelka, M. Gluchman, “Anthropomorphism as a methodological problem of animal ethics (in the memory of Sir Patrick Bateson),” Ethics&Bioethics (in Central Europe), 7(3-4), pp. 169–176, Dec. 2017.
[7] N. E. Maksimova, I. O. Aleksandrov, “The prospective trajectory for psychology evolution. Part 1. Experimental methodology as the approach to invention of new psychological knowledge by means of research,” Psychological Journal, 37(1), pp. 5–15, Feb. 2016.
[8] I. O. Aleksandrov, Maksimova N. E., “The principle of interaction/development: its application potential for investigation of communication” In Education and personal development in modern communicative space, Irkutsk, 2016, pp. 8-17.
[9] Ya. A. Ponomarev, “The development of the psychological organization of intellectual activity,” in The principle of development in psychology. Moscow: Nauka, 1978, pp. 63-80.
[10] Yu. I. Alexandrov, T. N. Grechenko, V. V. Gavrilov, A. G. Gorkin, D. G. Shevchenko, Yu. V. Grinchenko, I. O. Aleksandrov, N. E. Maksimova, B. N. Bezdenezhnych, M. V. Bodunov, “Formation and Realization of Individual Experience in Humans and Animals: A Psychophysiological Approach,” in Complex Brain Functions, vol. 2, P. M. Balaban, R. Miller, A. M. Ivanitsky, Eds. Harwood Academic Publishers, 2005, pp. 176-195.
[11] N. E. Maksimova, I. O. Aleksandrov, “The Prospective trajectory for psychology evolution. Part II. Organization of the subject field of psychology,” Psychological Journal, 37(2), pp. 5-18, Apr. 2016.
[12] V. B. Shvyrkov “Behavioral specialization of neurons and the system-selection hypothesis of learning” in Human memory and cognitive capabilities, F. Rösier, D. Manzey, F. Klix, H. Hagendorf, Eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1986, pp. 599-611.
[13] I. O. Aleksandrov, N. E. Maksimova, A. G. Gorkin, D. G. Shevchenko, I. V. Tikhomirova, E. V. Filippova, Y. B. Nikitin “System investigation of the individual knowledge structure,” Psychological Journal, 20(1), pp. 49-69, Feb. 1999.
[14] V. B. Shvyrkov, “Systemic-Evolutionary Approach to Study of the Brain, the Mind and Сonsciousness,” Psychological Journal, 9(1), pp. 132–148, 1988.
[15] N. E. Maksimova, I. O. Aleksandrov, I., Yu. A. Zavarnova, V. S. Sviridov, D. Turubar, “Differentiation and organization of psychological struсtures in subjects acquiring competence in new subject fields. Part I. Properties of self-replicating structures and their operationalization,” Psychological Journal, 40(1), pp. 15-27, March 2019.
[16] N. E. Maksimova, I. O. Aleksandrov, Yu. A. Zavarnova, V. S. Sviridov, D. Turubar, “Differentiation and organization of psychological struсtures in subjects acquiring competence in new subject fields. Part II. Empirical evidences of existence of self-replicating structures,” Psychological Journal, 40(2), pp. 47-65, June 2019.
[17] N. E. Maksimova, I. O. Aleksandrov, B. P. Yurkevich., D. S. Turubar, “Cross-Individual Psychological Structures and the Phenomenon of Anthropomorphization in Joint Activity,” Izvestiya irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Series: Psychology, 31, pp. 81-95, 2020.
[18] R. Bergmüller, M. Taborsky, “Animal personality due to social niche specialization,” Trends in ecology & evolution, 25(9), pp. 504-511, Sept. 2010.
[19] R. C. Shaw, M. Schmelz, “Cognitive test batteries in animal cognition research: evaluating the past, present and future of comparative psychometrics,” Animal cognition, 20(6), pp. 1003-1018, Oct. 2017.
[20] C. J. Völter, B. Tinklenberg, J. Call, A. M. Seed, “Comparative psychometrics: establishing what differs is central to understanding what evolves,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1756), 20170283, May 2018.
[21] A. A. Tuffery, Laboratory animals: an introduction for new experimenters. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1995.
[22] R. O. Kuehl, Design of Experiments: Statistical Principles of Research Design and Analysis, 2nd ed. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury Press, 1999.
[23] D. C. Montgomery, Design and analysis of experiments. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2017.
[24] I. O. Aleksandrov, Formation of Structure of Individual Knowledge. Moscow: Institute of Psychology RAS, 2006, pp. 94-95.
[25] B. G. Galef, K. N. Laland, “Social learning in animals: empirical studies and theoretical models,” Bioscience, 55(6), pp. 489-499, June 2005.
[26] C. Schuppli, C. P. van Schaik “Animal Cultures: how we’ve only seen the tip of the iceberg,” Evolutionary Human Sciences, 1, pp. 1–13, May 2019.
[27] B. G. Galef, “Social learning and traditions in animals: evidence, definitions, and relationship to human culture,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 3(6), pp. 581-592, Oct. 2012.
[28] E. Danchin, S. Nöbel, A. Pocheville, A. C. Dagaeff, L. Demay, M. Alphand, S. Ranty-Robylara, L. van Renssen, M. Moniereva, E. Gazagne, M Allain, G. Isabel, “Cultural flies: Conformist social learning in fruitflies predicts long-lasting mate-choice traditions,” Science, 362(6418), pp. 1025-1030, Nov. 2018.
[29] M. Mead, “Changing styles of anthropological work,” Annual Review of Anthropology, 2(1), pp. 1-27, 1973
[30] I. B. Bartal, P. Mason, “Helping Behavior in Rats” in Neuronal Correlates of Empathy: From Rodent to Human. Academic press, March 2018, pp. 151–160.
[31] J. W. Berry, Cross-cultural research and methodology series: III. Human ecology and cognitive style: Comparative studies in cultural and psychological adaptation. New York, NY: Sage Publications, 1976.
[32] H. C. Triandis, “Cross-cultural social and personality psychology,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3(2), pp. 143-158, January 1977.
[33] H. C. Triandis, Culture and social behavior. London: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
[34] T. Ciborowski, “The role of context, skill, and transfer in cross-cultural experimentation,” in Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, vol. 2, H. Triandis, J. Berry, Eds. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1980, pp. 279-296.
[35] G. Hofstede, “Cultural constraints in management theories,” Academy of Management Perspectives, 7(1), pp. 81-94, February 1993.
[36] B. G. Galef, “Social enhancement of food preferences in Norway rats: a brief review” in Social learning in animals: The roots of culture, C. M. Heyes, B. G. Galef, Eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 49-64, 1996.
[37] D. Matsumoto, “Culture, context, and behavior,” Journal of personality, 75(6), pp. 1285-1320, Sept. 2007.
[38] S. D. Preston, F. B. De Waal, “Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases,” Behavioral and brain sciences, 25(1), pp. 1-20, 2002.
[39] M. Bekoff, P. W. Sherman, “Reflections on animal selves,” Trends in ecology & evolution, 19(4), pp. 176-180, Apr. 2004.
[40] J. Panksepp, “Cross-species affective neuroscience decoding of the primal affective experiences of humans and related animals,” PloS one, 6(9), e21236, Sept. 2011.
[41] V. E. Sokolov, E. V. Karaseva, The brown rat: Systematics. Ecology. Population regulation. Moscow: Nauka, 1990.
[42] M. K. Schweinfurth, “The social life of Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus),” Elife, 9(e54020), Apr. 2020.
[43] A. K. Uskul, J. Keller, D. Oyserman, “Regulatory fit and health behavior,” Psychology & Health, 23, pp. 327−346. Apr. 2008.
[44] E. L. MacLean, B. Hare, C. L. Nunn, E. Addessi, F., Amici, R. C. Anderson, ... & Zhao, Y, “The evolution of self-control,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(20), pp. E2140-E2148, Apr. 2014.
[45] L. Mellotti, J. D. Bailoo, E. Murphy, O. Burman, H. Wurbel, “Play in Rats: Association across Contexts and Types, and Analysis of Structure,” Animal Behavior and Cognition, 1(4), Nov. 2014.
[46] A. S. Reinchold, J. I. Sanguinetti-Scheck, K. Hartmann, M. Brecht “Behavioral and neural correlates of hide-and-seek in rats,” Science, 365, pp. 1180–1183, Sept. 2019.
[47] M. R. LaFollette, M. E. O’Haire, S. Cloutier, W. B. Blankenberger, B. N. Gaskill, “Rat tickling: A systematic review of applications, outcomes, and moderators,” PLOS One, 12(4), pp. 1–22, Apr. 2017.
[48] J. Panksepp, J. Burgdorf, “Laughing Rats? Playful Tickling Arouses High-Frequency Ultrasonic Chirping in Young Rodents,” American Journal of Play, 2(3), pp. 357-372, 2010.
[49] R. Affifi. “Anthropocentrism’s fluid binary,” Environmental Education Research, 26(9-10), pp. 1435-1452, Sept. 2020.
[50] P. Jemelka, M. Gluchman, “Anthropomorphism as a methodological problem of animal ethics (in the memory of Sir Patrick Bateson),” Ethics&Bioethics (in Central Europe), 7(3-4), pp. 169–176, Dec. 2017.
[51] V. B. Shvyrkov, “The neurophysiological data on the structure of subjective experience,” International Journal of Psychophysiology, 7(2-4), pp. 391-392, Aug. 1989.
[52] I. O. Aleksandrov, N. E. Maksimova, “Differentiation of Institutionalized Subject Fields and Communication,” Izvestiya irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Series: Psychology, 9, pp. 4-11, 2014.
[53] P. T. Young, “The experimental analysis of appetite,” Psychological Bulletin, 38(3), pp. 129-164, March 1941.
[54] N. A. Shvyrkova, “System analysis of neural provision of exploratory activity in food-acquisition behavior” in System mechanisms of behavior, Medicine, 1990.
[55] I. J. Makowska, D. M. Weary “The importance burrowing, climbing and standing upright,” Royal Society Open Science, June 2016.
[56] K. Modlinska, A. Chrzanowska, W. Pisula “The impact of changeability of enriched environment on exploration in rats,” Behavioural Processes, 164, pp. 78–85, April 2019.
[57] J. Kopp, G. Bourland, R. D. Tarte, C. R. Vernon, “Acquisition of bar pressing in nondeprived rats,” The Psychological Record, 26(1), pp. 49-54, Jan. 1976.
[58] J. W. Grimm, F. Sauter, “Environmental enrichment reduces food seeking and taking in rats: A review,” Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 190, 172874, March 2020.
[59] S. D. Vann, J. P. Aggleton, E. A. Maguire, “What does the retrosplenial cortex do?,” Nature reviews neuroscience, 10(11), pp. 792-802, Oct. 2009.
[60] N. E. Maksimova, I. O. Aleksandrov, “Typology of slow brain potentials, neuronal activity and the dynamics of systemic organization of behavior,” EEG and neuronal activity in psychophysiological research, pp. 44-72, 1987.
[61] A. G. Gorkin, K. G. Reymann, Yu. I. Alexandrov, “Long-term potentiation and evoked spike responses in the cingulate cortex of freely mobile rats,” Neuroscience and behavioral physiology, 33(8), pp. 763-772, Oct. 2003.
[62] N. E. Maksimova, I. O. Aleksandrov, “Project of the subject of psychology creation in methodological conception of YA. A. Ponomarev,” Psychological Journal, 42(1), pp. 5-15, Feb. 2021.
[63] I. Lakatos, The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, Volume 1: Philosophical Papers, J. Worrall, G. Currie, Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.
[64] A. V. Varfolomeeva, A. G. Tishenko, “Toward to norm and normativity in methodology of systemic-evolutionary approach,” in Human World: Normative Dimension – 7.0, Saratov, June 2021, pp. 308-323.