Generation of 3D Models Obtained with Low-Cost RGB and Thermal Sensors Mounted on Drones
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32797
Generation of 3D Models Obtained with Low-Cost RGB and Thermal Sensors Mounted on Drones

Authors: Julio Manuel de Luis Ruiz, Javier Sedano Cibrián, Rubén Pérez Álvarez, Raúl Pereda García, Felipe Piña García

Abstract:

Nowadays it is common to resort to aerial photography to carry out the prospection and/or exploration of archaeological sites. In recent years, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) have been applied as the vehicles that carry the sensor. This implies certain advantages, such as the possibility of including low-cost sensors, given that these vehicles can carry the sensor at relatively low altitudes. Due to this, low-cost dual sensors have recently begun to be used. This new equipment can collaborate with classic Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) in the exploration of archaeological sites, but this entails the need for a methodological setting to optimize the acquisition, processing and exploitation of the information provided by low-cost dual sensors. This research focuses on the design of an appropriate workflow to obtain 3D models with low-cost sensors carried on UAVs, both in the RGB and thermal domains. All the foregoing has been applied to the archaeological site of Juliobriga, located in Cantabria (Spain). To this end, a flight with this type of sensors has been planned, developed and analyzed. It has been applied to the archaeological site of Juliobriga (Cantabria, Spain). A strong dependence of the thermal sensor on the GSD, and the capability of this technique to interpret underground materials. This research allows to state that the thermal nature of the site does not provide main information about the site itself, but with combination with other types of information, such as the DEM, the typology of materials, etc., can produce very positive results with respect to the exploration and knowledge of the site. 

Keywords: process optimization, RGB models, thermal models, UAV, workflow

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 543

References:


[1] Tscharf, A., Rumpler, M., Fraundorfer, F., Mayer, G., & Bischof, H. (2015). On the use of uavs in mining and archaeology-geo-accurate 3d reconstructions using various platforms and terrestrial views. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 2(1W1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-II-1-W1-15-2015
[2] Carrera-Hernández, J. J., Levresse, G., & Lacan, P. (2020). Is UAV-SfM surveying ready to replace traditional surveying techniques? International Journal of Remote Sensing, 41(12), 4818–4835. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2020.1727049
[3] Hill, A. C. (2019). Economical drone mapping for archaeology: Comparisons of efficiency and accuracy. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 24(April 2017), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2018.12.011.
[4] Nex, F., & Remondino, F. (2014). UAV for 3D mapping applications: A review. Applied Geomatics, 6(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-013-0120-x.
[5] Raimundo, J., Medina, S. L. C., Prieto, J. F., & de Mata, J. A. (2021). Super resolution infrared thermal imaging using pansharpening algorithms: Quantitative assessment and application to uav thermal imaging. Sensors (Switzerland), 21(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/s2104126
[6] I. Colomina, P. Molina, “Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review”. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 2014. vol 92. pp79-97.
[7] Fernández Vega, P.A., Bolado del Castillo, R. Callejo Gómez, J. Mantecón Callejo, L. 2012. “Un término augustal del ager Iuliobrigensium. Archivo Español de Arquelogía, 85.267-271.
[8] Mesas-Carrascosa, F. J., García, M. D. N., De Larriva, J. E. M., & García-Ferrer, A. (2016). An analysis of the influence of flight parameters in the generation of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) orthomosaicks to survey archaeological areas. Sensors (Switzerland), 16(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/s16111838
[9] De Luis Ruiz, J. M.; Sedano Cibrián, J.; Pereda García, R.; Pérez Álvarez, R.; Malagón Picón, B. Optimization of Photogrammetric Flights with UAVs for the Metric Virtualization of Archaeological Sites. Application to Juliobriga (Cantabria, Spain). (2021) Appl. Sci. 2018 11(3), 1204. doi: 10.3390/app1103120
[10] Casana, J., Wiewel, A., Cool, A., Hill, A. C., Fisher, K. D., & Laugier, E. J. (2017). Archaeological Aerial Thermography in Theory and Practice. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 5(4), 310–327. https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2017.23
[11] Casana, J., Wiewel, A., Cool, A., Hill, A. C., Fisher, K. D., & Laugier, E. J. (2017). Archaeological Aerial Thermography in Theory and Practice. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 5(4), 310–327. https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2017.23
[12] Blistan, P., Kovanič, Ľ., Patera, M., & Hurčík, T. (2019). Evaluation quality parameters of DEM generated with low-cost UAV photogrammetry and structure-from-motion (SfM) approach for topographic surveying of small areas. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 24(3), 198–212.