The Effects of Subjective and Objective Indicators of Inequality on Life Satisfaction in a Comparative Perspective Using a Multi-Level Analysis
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32794
The Effects of Subjective and Objective Indicators of Inequality on Life Satisfaction in a Comparative Perspective Using a Multi-Level Analysis

Authors: Atefeh Bagherianziarat, Dana Hamplova

Abstract:

The inverse social gradient in life satisfaction (LS) is a well-established research finding. Although objective aspects of inequality or individuals’ socioeconomic status are among the approved predictors of life satisfaction; however, less is known about the effect of subjective inequality and the interplay of these two aspects of inequality on life satisfaction. It is suggested that individuals’ perception of their socioeconomic status in society can moderate the link between their absolute socioeconomic status and life satisfaction. Nevertheless, this moderating link has not been affirmed to work likewise in societies with different welfare regimes associating with different levels of social inequality. In this study, we compared the moderative influence of subjective inequality on the link between objective inequality and LS. In particular, we focus on differences across welfare state regimes based on Esping-Andersen's theory. Also, we explored the moderative role of believing in the value of equality on the link between objective and subjective inequality on LS, in the given societies. Since our studied variables were measured at both individual and country levels, we applied a multilevel analysis to the European Social Survey data (round 9). The results showed that people in different regimes reported statistically meaningful different levels of LS that is explained to different extends by their household income and their perception of their income inequality. The findings of the study supported the previous findings of the moderator influence of perceived inequality on the link between objective inequality and LS. However, this link is different in various welfare state regimes. The results of the multilevel modeling showed that country-level subjective equality is a positive predictor for individuals’ LS, while the Gini coefficient that was considered as the indicator of absolute inequality has a smaller effect on LS. Also, country-level subjective equality moderates the confirmed link between individuals’ income and their LS. It can be concluded that both individual and country-level subjective inequality slightly moderate the effect of individuals’ income on their LS.

Keywords: individual values, life satisfaction, multi-level analysis, objective inequality, subjective inequality, welfare regimes status

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 624

References:


[1] Marees, A. T., et al. (2020). "Potential influence of socioeconomic status on genetic correlations between alcohol consumption measures and mental health." Psychological medicine 50(3): 484-498.
[2] Kong, F., et al. (2019). "The Relationship between Socioeconomic Status, Mental Health, and Need for Long-Term Services and Supports among the Chinese Elderly in Shandong Province-A Cross-Sectional Study." International journal of environmental research and public health 16(4): 526.
[3] Wang, J. and L. Geng (2019). "Effects of Socioeconomic status on physical and psychological health: lifestyle as a mediator." International journal of environmental research and public health 16(2): 281.
[4] Angelini, V., et al. (2018). "Childhood Socioeconomic Status and Late-Adulthood Mental Health: Results from the Survey on Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe." The Journals of Gerontology: Series B 74(1): 95-104.
[5] Silva, M., Loureiro, A., & Cardoso, G. (2016). Social determinants of mental health: a review of the evidence. The European Journal of Psychiatry, 30, 259-292.
[6] Stewart-Brown, S., et al. (2015). "Socioeconomic gradients and mental health: implications for public health." The British Journal of Psychiatry 206(6): 461-465.
[7] Kim, J., Richardson, V., Park, B., & Park, M. (2013). A multilevel perspective on gender differences in the relationship between poverty status and depression among older adults in the United States. Women Aging, 25(3), 207-26.
[8] Wilkinson, R. and K. Pickett (2010). The Spirit Level: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger, Bloomsbury Publishing.
[9] Patel, V., Lund, C., Hatherill, S., Plagerson, S., Corrigall, J., Funk, M., et al. (2010). Mental disorders: equity and social determinants. In E. Blas, & A. Kurup, Equity, social determinants and public health programmes (pp. 115-134). Geneva: World Health Organization.
[10] Stankunas, M., Kalediene, R., Starkuviene, S., & Kapustinskiene, V. (2006). Duration of unemployment and depression: a cross-sectional survey in Lithuania. BMC Public Health, 6, 174.
[11] Russell, M. A. and C. L. Odgers (2020). "Adolescents’ subjective social status predicts day‐to‐day mental health and future substance use." Journal of Research on Adolescence 30: 532-544.
[12] Rivenbark, J. G., et al. (2019). "Perceived social status and mental health among young adolescents: Evidence from census data to cellphones." Developmental psychology 55(3): 574.
[13] Präg, Patrick, Melinda Mills, and Rafael Wittek, 2016: “Subjective Socioeconomic Status and Health in Cross-National Comparison,” Social Science and Medicine 149, pp. 84–92
[14] Scott, K. M., et al. (2014). "Associations Between Subjective Social Status and DSM-IV Mental Disorders: Results from the World Mental Health Surveys." JAMA Psychiatry 71(12): 1400-1408.
[15] Euteneuer, F. (2014). "Subjective social status and health." Current opinion in psychiatry 27(5): 337-343.
[16] Diaz, O. V., et al. (2014). "Subjective social status and depression symptoms: a prospective study of women with noncancerous pelvic problems." Women's Health Issues 24(6): 649-655.
[17] Hoebel, J., et al. (2017). "Social Inequalities and Depressive Symptoms in Adults: The Role of Objective and Subjective Socioeconomic Status." PLOS ONE 12(1): e0169764.
[18] Subramanyam, M. A., et al. (2012). "Subjective social status and psychosocial and metabolic risk factors for cardiovascular disease among African Americans in the Jackson Heart Study." Social science & medicine 74(8): 1146-1154.
[19] Adler, N., et al. (2008). "Social status and health: a comparison of British civil servants in Whitehall-II with European-and African-Americans in CARDIA." Social science & medicine 66(5): 1034-1045.
[20] Singh-Manoux, A., et al. (2005). "Does Subjective Social Status Predict Health and Change in Health Status Better Than Objective Status?" Psychosomatic Medicine 67(6): 855-861.
[21] Hu, P., et al. (2005). "Relationship between subjective social status and measures of health in older Taiwanese persons." Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53(3): 483-488.
[22] Barry, Margaret M. (2009). Addressing the determinants of positive mental health: concepts, evidence and practice International Journal of Mental Health Promotion, 11(3), 4-17.
[23] Bøe. T, Petrie. J. K., Sivertsen. B, Hysing. M, (2019), Interplay of subjective and objective economic well-being on the mental health of Norwegian adolescents, SSM - Population Health, Volume 9, 2019,100471,
[24] Bannink R, Pearce A, Hope S. (2016), Family income and young adolescents' perceived social position: associations with self-esteem and life satisfaction in the UK Millennium Cohort Study. Arch Dis Child. 2016 Oct;101(10):917-21.
[25] Doornbos, J. (2018). The moderating role of subjective socioeconomic status on the relationship between objective SES and mental health problems in Dutch adolescents in times of economic crisis (2009-2013).
[26] Smith, H. J. and Y. J. Huo (2014). "Relative deprivation: How subjective experiences of inequality influence social behavior and health." Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1(1): 231-238.
[27] Smith, H. J., et al. (2011). "Relative deprivation: a theoretical and meta-analytic review." Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of
[28] Fiske, S. (2011). "Envy up, scorn down: How status divides us." Envy Up, Scorn Down: How Status Divides Us: 1-240.
[29] Tyler, T R. (2006), Why People Obey the Law, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400828609
[30] Curhan, K. B., et al. (2014). "Subjective and Objective Hierarchies and Their Relations to Psychological Well-Being: A U.S/Japan Comparison." Soc Psychol Personal Sci 5(8): 855-864.
[31] Castro, I. E., et al. (2020). "Race Differences in the Effect of Subjective Social Status on Hostility and Depressive Symptoms Among 9- to 11-Year-Old Children." Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities.
[32] Theodossiou, I. and A. Zangelidis (2009). "The social gradient in health: The effect of absolute income and subjective social status assessment on the individual's health in Europe." Economics & Human Biology 7(2): 229-237.
[33] Callan, M. J., Shead, N. W., & Olson, J. M. (2011). Personal relative deprivation, delay discounting, and gambling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(5), 955–973
[34] Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., Mendoza-Denton, R., Rheinschmidt, M. L., & Keltner, D. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review, 119(3), 546–572.
[35] Kraus, M. W., et al. (2013). "Is the association of subjective SES and self-rated health confounded by negative mood? An experimental approach." Health psychology 32(2): 138.
[36] Lundberg, O., Yngwe, M. A., Stjärne, M. K., Elstad, J. I., Ferrarini, T., Kangas, O., Norström, T., Palme, J., Fritzell, J., & NEWS Nordic Expert Group (2008). The role of welfare state principles and generosity in social policy programmes for public health: an international comparative study. Lancet (London, England), 372(9650), 1633–1640. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61686-4
[37] Rostila, M. (2015). Gøsta Esping-Andersen: Welfare Regimes and Social Inequalities in Health. In The Palgrave Handbook of Social Theory in Health, Illness and Medicine (pp. 644-659). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
[38] Schuck, B., & Steiber, N. (2018). Does intergenerational educational mobility shape the well-being of young Europeans? Evidence from the European Social Survey. Social indicators research, 139(3), 1237-1255.
[39] Popham, F., Dibben, C., & Bambra, C. (2013). Are health inequalities really not the smallest in the Nordic welfare states? A comparison of mortality inequality in 37 countries. J Epidemiol Community Health, 67(5), 412-418.
[40] Eikemo, T. A., Bambra, C., Judge, K., & Ringdal, K. (2008). Welfare state regimes and differences in self-perceived health in Europe: a multilevel analysis. Social science & medicine, 66(11), 2281-2295.
[41] Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Political Economies of the Welfare State. International Journal of Sociology, 20(3), 92-123. Retrieved June 29, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20630041
[42] Bambra C. Going beyond the three worlds of welfare capitalism: regime theory and public health research. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61(12):1098-1102. doi:10.1136/jech.2007.064295
[43] Fenger, M. (2007). Welfare regimes in Central and Eastern Europe: Incorporating post-communist countries in a welfare regime typology. Contemporary issues and ideas in social sciences, 3(2), 1-30.
[44] Kalmijn, M., & Saraceno, C. (2008). A comparative perspective on intergenerational support: Responsiveness to parental needs in individualistic and familialistic countries. European Societies, 10(3), 479-508.
[45] Bohle, D., & Greskovits, B. (2007). Neoliberalism, embedded neoliberalism and neocorporatism: Towards transnational capitalism in Central-Eastern Europe. West European Politics, 30(3), 443-466.