Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32138
Performance Evaluation of Minimum Quantity Lubrication on EN3 Mild Steel Turning

Authors: Swapnil Rajan Jadhav, Ajay Vasantrao Kashikar

Abstract:

Lubrication, cooling and chip removal are the desired functions of any cutting fluid. Conventional or flood lubrication requires high volume flow rate and cost associated with this is higher. In addition, flood lubrication possesses health risks to machine operator. To avoid these consequences, dry machining and minimum quantity are two alternatives. Dry machining cannot be a suited alternative as it can generate greater heat and poor surface finish. Here, turning work is carried out on a Lathe machine using EN3 Mild steel. Variable cutting speeds and depth of cuts are provided and corresponding temperatures and surface roughness values were recorded. Experimental results are analyzed by Minitab software. Regression analysis, main effect plot, and interaction plot conclusion are drawn by using ANOVA. There is a 95.83% reduction in the use of cutting fluid. MQL gives a 9.88% reduction in tool temperature, this will improve tool life. MQL produced a 17.64% improved surface finish. MQL appears to be an economical and environmentally compatible lubrication technique for sustainable manufacturing.

Keywords: ANOVA, MQL, regression analysis, surface roughness

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 215

References:


[1] S. Amini, H. Khakbaz, A. Barani, “Improvement of Near-Dry Machining and Its effect on Tool wear in Turning of AISI 4142”, Materials and Manufacturing processes, 30: 241-247, 2015.
[2] Pintu, "Difference Between Flood Cooling and Minimum Quantity Lubrication (MQL)", http://www.difference.minaprem.com/machining/difference-between-flood-cooling-and-minimum-quantity-lubrication-mql/
[accessed on 13/12/2020].
[3] Zhaoju Zhu, Bingwei He, Jianxiong Chen, “Evaluation of tool temperature distribution in MQL drilling of aluminium 2024-T351”,Journal of Manufacturing Processes, Volume 56, Part A, August 2020, Pages 757-765.
[4] Available: http://minimumquantitylubrication.com/?page_id=2
[Accessed: December 12, 2020].
[5] Rupesh M. Parthe, Taqui Z. Quazi, “Performance Evaluation of MQL on AISI 4130 Steel on Universal Milling Machine”, International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), Volume 5, 419-422, Issue 10, October 2016.
[6] Davim, J. P. "Machining Fundamentals, and Recent Advances", Springer Verlag Limited: London, 2008.
[7] Ali S. M., “Effect of MQL on cutting performance in turning medium carbon steel”, Advances in production engineering and management, 2011.
[8] D. V. Lohar and C. R. Nanavaty, “Performance Evaluation of Minimum Quantity Lubrication (MQL) using CBN Tool during Hard Turning of AISI 4340 and its Comparison with Dry and Wet Turning”, Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, 2013.
[9] Kedare S. B, “Effect of mínimum quantity lubrication (MQL) on surface roughness of mild steel of 15hrc on universal milling machine”, Procedia Materials Science 6, 2014.
[10] Azreen Zainol, M. Z. A. Yazid, “Effect of Minimum Quantity Lubrication and Dry Cutting on the Tool Life and Chip Morphology after Milling of Aluminum Alloy 7075-T6”, International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, ISSN: 2277-3878, Volume-8 Issue-2, July 2019.
[11] Samatham Madhukar, Aitha Shravan, Pakka Vidyanand, G. Sreeram Reddy, “A Critical Review on Minimum Quantity Lubrication (MQL) Coolant System for Machining Operations”, International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, Vol. 6, No. 5 (Oct 2016). Available at http://inpressco.com/category/ijcet.