Methodology of Personalizing Interior Spaces in Public Libraries
Authors: Baharak Mousapour
Creating public spaces which are tailored for the specific demands of the individuals is one of the challenges for the contemporary interior designers. Improving the general knowledge as well as providing a forum for all walks of life to exploit is one of the objectives of a public library. In this regard, interior design in consistent with the demands of the individuals is of paramount importance. Seemingly, study spaces, in particular, those in close relation to the personalized sector, have proven to be challenging, according to the literature. To address this challenge, attributes of individuals, namely, perception of people from public spaces and their interactions with the so-called spaces, should be analyzed to provide interior designers with something to work on. This paper follows the analytic-descriptive research methodology by outlining case study libraries which have personalized public libraries with the investigation of the type of personalization as its primary objective and (I) recognition of physical schedule and the know-how of the spatial connection in indoor design of a library and (II) analysis of each personalized space in relation to other spaces of the library as its secondary objectives. The significance of the current research lies in the concept of personalization as one of the most recent methods of attracting people to libraries. Previous research exists in this regard, but the lack of data concerning personalization makes this topic worth investigating. Hence, this study aims to put forward approaches through real-case studies for the designers to deal with this concept.Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 325
 Black, A. (2004). National planning for public library service: The work and ideas of Lionel McColvin.
 Bisbrouck, M. F., & Chauveinc, M. Intelligent library buildings (The Hague, 24-29 August 1997). IFLA publications.
 Lucker, J. (2004). Critical issues in library space planning for the 21st century. In Proceedings of the 12 th international seminar of the IFLA Section on Library Buildings and Equipment. München: Saur.
 Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in nursing & health, 30(4), 459-467.
 Shen, A., & Ball, A. D. (2009). Is personalization of services always a good thing? Exploring the role of technology‐mediated personalization (TMP) in service relationships. Journal of Services Marketing.
 Caivano, J. L. (2006). Research on color in architecture and environmental design: Brief history, current developments, and possible future. Color Research & Application: Endorsed by Inter‐Society Color Council, The Colour Group (Great Britain), Canadian Society for Color, Color Science Association of Japan, Dutch Society for the Study of Color, The Swedish Colour Centre Foundation, Colour Society of Australia, Centre Français de la Couleur, 31(4), 350-363.
 Clark, R. (2008). Impact Library Access with Bold Use of Color and Space. Library Media Connection, 27(2), 16-18.
 Daggett, W. R., Cobble, J. E., & Gertel, S. J. (2008). Color in an optimum learning environment. International center for Leadership in education, 1.
 Oliver, R. L. (1992). An investigation of the attribute basis of emotion and related affects in consumption: suggestions for a stage-specific satisfaction framework. ACR North American Advances.
 Scargall, H. (1999). Color: An Unsuspected Influence. Library Talk, 12(5), 11-12.