Capacities of Early Childhood Education Professionals for the Prevention of Social Exclusion of Children
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32799
Capacities of Early Childhood Education Professionals for the Prevention of Social Exclusion of Children

Authors: Dejana Bouillet, Vlatka Domović


Both policymakers and researchers recognize that participating in early childhood education and care (ECEC) is useful for all children, especially for those who are exposed to the high risk of social exclusion. Social exclusion of children is understood as a multidimensional construct including economic, social, cultural, health, and other aspects of disadvantage and deprivation, which individually or combined can have an unfavorable effect on the current life and development of a child, as well as on the child’s development and on disadvantaged life chances in adult life. ECEC institutions should be able to promote educational approaches that portray developmental, cultural, language, and other diversity amongst children. However, little is known about the ways in which Croatian ECEC institutions recognize and respect the diversity of children and their families and how they respond to their educational needs. That is why this paper is dedicated to the analysis of the capacities of ECEC professionals to respond to the demands of educational needs of this very diverse group of children and their families. The results obtained in the frame of the project “Models of response to educational needs of children at risk of social exclusion in ECEC institutions,” funded by the Croatian Science Foundation, will be presented. The research methodology arises from explanations of educational processes and risks of social exclusion as a complex and heterogeneous phenomenon. The preliminary results of the qualitative data analysis of educational practices regarding capacities to identify and appropriately respond to the requirements of children at risk of social exclusion will be presented. The data have been collected by interviewing educational staff in 10 Croatian ECEC institutions (n = 10). The questions in the interviews were related to various aspects of inclusive institutional policy, culture, and practices. According to the analysis, it is possible to conclude that Croatian ECEC professionals are still faced with great challenges in the process of implementation of inclusive policies, culture, and practices. There are several baselines of this conclusion. The interviewed educational professionals are not familiar enough with the whole complexity and diversity of needs of children at risk of social exclusion, and the ECEC institutions do not have enough resources to provide all interventions that these children and their families need.

Keywords: children at risk of social exclusion, ECEC professionals, inclusive policies, culture and practices, interpretative phenomenological analysis

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 558


[1] G. Felouzis, and S. Charmillot, “School tracking and educational inequality: a comparison of 12 education systems in Switzerland,” Comparative Education, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 181-205, Sep. 2012.
[2] Ch. Gross, H. D. Meyer, and A. Hadjar, “Theorising the impact of education systems on ineqalities,” in Education systems and inequalities - International comparisons, A. Hadjar, and Ch. Gross, Eds. Bristol: Policy Press, 2016, pp. 11-32.
[3] D. Bloome, S. Dyer, and X. Zhou, “Educational inequality, educational expansion, and intergenerational income persistence in the United States,” American Sociological Review, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 1215-1253, Nov. 2018.
[4] W. Müller, “Educational inequality and social justice: Challenges for career guidance,” International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, vol. 14, pp. 21-33, March 2014.
[5] C. Vandekinderen, G. Roets, H. Van Keer, and R. Roose, “Tackling social inequality and exclusion in education: from human capital to capabilities,” International Journal of Inclusive Education, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1-20, Aug. 2017.
[6] S. Blömeke, U. Suhl, G. Kaiser, and M. Döhrmann, “Family background, entry selectivity and opportunities to learn: What matters in primary teacher education? An international comparison of fifteen countries,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 44-55, Jan. 2012.
[7] M. van Poortvliet, “Inequality in skills for learning: do gaps in children’s socio-emotional development widen over time according to family background?” Oxford Review of Education, published on-line March 2021.
[8] M. Cronin, K. Argent, and Ch. Collett, Poverty and Inclusion in Early Years Education. London & New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2018.
[9] B. Casalini, “The early childhood education and care policy debate in the EU,” Interdisciplinary Journal of Family Studies, vol. 19. no. 1, pp. 77-94. June 2014.
[10] European Commission Childcare Network, Quality Targets in Services for Young Children. Brussels: EC Childcare Network, 1996.
[11] European Commission, “Council recommendation of 22 May 2019 on High-Quality Early Childhood Education and Care Systems (2019/C 189/02), “Official Journal of the European Union C 189/4, 2019.
[12] European Commission, Proposal for key principles of a Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care: Report of the Working Group on Early Childhood Education and Care under the auspices of the European Commission, Brussels: Directorate-General for Education and Culture, 2014.
[13] H. Warming, “Inclusive discourses in early childhood education?” International Journal of Inclusive Education, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 233-247, Oct. 2010.
[14] I. Halinen, and R. Järvinen, “Towards inclusive education: the case of Finland,” Prospects, vol. 38, pp. 77-97., Sept. 2008.
[15] A. Fyssa, A. Vlachou, and E. Avramidis, “Early childhood teachers' understanding of inclusive education and associated practices: reflections from Greece,” International Journal of Early Years Education, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 223-237, Apr. 2014.
[16] S. Wong, and K. Turner, “Constructions of social inclusion within Australian early childhood education and care policy documents,” Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 54-68, Jan. 2014.
[17] N. Jordt Jørgensen, K. Dahl Madsen, and M. Husted, Sustainability education and social inclusion in Nordic early childhood education, Münster: Waxmann, 2020.
[18] H. Frazer, and E. Marlier, Investing in children: Breaking the cycle of disadvantage - A study of national policies Assessment of what Member States would need to do to implement the European Commission Recommendation, Synthesis Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2014.
[19] OECD, Who uses childcare? Background brief on inequalities in the use of formal early childhood education and care (ECEC) among very young children, Paris: OECD, 2016.
[20] J. Balladares, and M. Kankaraš, “Attendance in early childhood education and care programmes and academic proficiencies at age 15,” OECD Education Working Papers, no. 214, Paris: OECD Publishing, 2020.
[21] K. Sylva, E. Melhuish, P. Sammons, I. Siraj-Blatchford, B. Taggart, S. Hunt et all. Effective preschool and Education 3-11 Project. EPPE 3-11. Final Report from the Primary Phase: Preschool, School and Family Influences on Children’s Development During Key Stage 2 (Age 7 – 11), DfE Research Brief 061, London: DfE, 2008.
[22] D. Lowe Vandell, J. Belsky, M. Burchinal, N. Vandergrift, and L. Steinberg, “Do effects of early child care extend to age 15 years? Results from the NICHD study of early child care and youth development,” Child Development, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 737–756, May-Jun 2010.
[23] T. Matković, I. Dobrotić, and J. Baran, J. “What’s kindergarten got to do with it? Access to early childhood education and care and reproduction of social inequalities in regular education: Analysis of PISA and TIMSS data,” Revija za sociologiju, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 7–35, Apr. (2019)
[24] D. Bouillet, and V. Domović, “Social exclusion of children in early and preschool age: conceptualization, risks and model of intervention,” Ljetopis socijalnog rada, to be published 2021.
[25] M. Robo, “Social inclusion and inclusive education, “Academicus, vol. 10, pp. 181-191., May 2014.
[26] P. Saunders, “Social inclusion, exclusion, and well-being in Australia: meaning and measurement,” Australian Journal of Social Issues, vol. 50, pp. 139-157. Dec. 2016.
[27] P. Borkett, Cultural diversity and inclusion in early years education, Abingdon: Routledge, 2018.
[28] M. Ainscow, and A. Sandill, “Developing inclusive education systems: the role of organisational cultures and leadership,” International Journal of Inclusive Education, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 401-416, June 2010.
[29] D. Bouillet, Inclusive education: selected topics (Inkluzivno obrazovanje: odabrane teme), Zagreb: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Tecaher Education, 2019.
[30] H. Ginner Hau, H. Selenius, and E. Björck Åkesson, “A preschool for all children? – Swedish preschool teachers’ perspective on inclusion,” International Journal of Inclusive Education, published on line May 2020.
[31] T. Booth, M. Ainscow, and D. Kingston, Indeks for inxlusion: developing play, learning and participation in early years and childcare, Bristol: Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education (SSIE), 2006.
[32] Ch. Bove, and N. Sharmahd, “Beyond invisibility. Welcoming children and families with migrant and refugee background in ECEC settings,” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, vol. 28, no.1, pp. 1-9, Jan. 2020.
[33] O. Kamenarac, “Problematising constructions of 'expert teachers' and 'vulnerable children' in New Zealand Early Childhood,” International Journal of Early Years Education, published on line Feb. 2021.
[34] K. Cologon, “Better together: inclusive education in the early years,” in Inclusive Education in the Early Years: Right from the Start, K. Cologon, Ed. Oxford University Press, 2014, pp. 3-26.
[35] C. Murray, “A minority within a minority? Social justice for traveller and Roma children in ECEC," European Journal of Education, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 569-583, Dec. 2012.
[36] W. McCashen, The strengths approach. Bendigo, VIC: St. Luke’s Innovative Resources, 2005.
[37] A. Fenton, K. Walsh, S. Wong, and T. Cumming, “Using strengths-based approaches in early years practice and research,” International Journal of Early Childhood, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 27-52, Apr. 2015.
[38] J. Peeters, and N. Sharmahd, “Professional development for ECEC practitioners with responsibilities for children at risk: which competences and in-service training are needed?,” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 412-424, Jul. 2014.
[39] D. Tankersley, S. Brajković, S.Handžar, R. Rimkiene, R. Sabaliauskiene, Z. Trikić, T. Vonta, Theory in practice, a handbook for the professional development of primary school teachers (Teorija u praksi, priručnik za profesionalni razvoj učitelja razredne nastave), Zagreb: Pučko otvoreno učilište Korak po korak, 2012.
[40] State pedagogical standard of preschool education (Državni pedagoški standard predškolskog odgoja i naobrazbe), Official Gazete, no. 63/2008, and 90/2010.
[41] N. Pećnik, How parents and communities take care of the youngest children in Croatia? (Kako roditelji i zajednice brinu o djeci najmlađe dobi u Hrvatskoj?), Zagreb: UNICEF's Office for Croatia, 2013.
[42] Z. Šućur, M. Kletečki Radović, O. Družić Ljubotina, Z. Babić, Poverty and well-being of preschool children in the Republic of Croatia
[Siromaštvo i dobrobit djece predškolske dobi u Republici Hrvatskoj], Zagreb: UNICEF's Office for Croatia, 2015.
[43] D. Bouillet, Beyond the inclusion of children in early and preschool age (S one strane inkluzije djece rane i predškolske dobi), Zagreb: UNICEF's Office for Croatia, 2018.
[44] A. Alase, “The interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA): A Guide to a Good Qualitative Research Approach,” International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 9-19, Apr. 2017.