Sustainable Balanced Scorecard for Kaizen Evaluation: Comparative Study between Egypt and Japan

Authors: Ola I. S. El Dardery, Ismail Gomaa, Adel R. M. Rayan, Ghada El Khayat, Sara H. Sabry

Abstract:

Continuous improvement activities are becoming a key organizational success factor; those improvement activities include but are not limited to kaizen, six sigma, lean production, and continuous improvement projects. Kaizen is a Japanese philosophy of continuous improvement by making small incremental changes to improve an organization’s performance, reduce costs, reduce delay time, reduce waste in production, etc. This research aims at proposing a measuring system for kaizen activities from a sustainable balanced scorecard perspective. A survey was developed and disseminated among kaizen experts in both Egypt and Japan with the purpose of allocating key performance indicators for both kaizen process (critical success factors) and result (kaizen benefits) into the five sustainable balanced scorecard perspectives. This research contributes to the extant literature by presenting a kaizen measurement of both kaizen process and results that will illuminate the benefits of using kaizen. Also, the presented measurement can help in the sustainability of kaizen implementation across various sectors and industries. Thus, grasping the full benefits of kaizen implementation will contribute to the spread of kaizen understanding and practice. Also, this research provides insights on the social and cultural differences that would influence the kaizen success. Determining the combination of the proper kaizen measures could be used by any industry, whether service or manufacturing for better kaizen activities measurement. The comparison between Japanese implementation of kaizen, as the pioneers of continuous improvement, and Egyptian implementation will help recommending better practices of kaizen in Egypt and contributing to the 2030 sustainable development goals. The study results reveal that there is no significant difference in allocating kaizen benefits between Egypt and Japan. However, with regard to the critical success factors some differences appeared reflecting the social differences and understanding between both countries, a single integrated measurement was reached between the Egyptian and Japanese allocation highlighting the Japanese experts’ opinion as the ultimate criterion for selection.

Keywords: continuous improvements, kaizen, performance, sustainable balanced scorecard

References:

[1] F. Gonzalez-Aleu, E. M. Van Aken, J. Cross, and W. J. Glover, “Continuous improvement project within Kaizen: critical success factors in hospitals,” TQM J., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 335–355, 2018, doi: 10.1108/TQM-12-2017-0175.
[2] J.-I. Ker and Y. Wang, “Kaizen Policies in Healthcare Governance: Reducing Patient-Flow Delays in Outpatient Surgery Setting through Healthcare Information Technology,” Ssrn, pp. 1–29, 2015, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2624133.
[3] Nihon H. R. Kyōkai, Improvement Engine Creativity and Innovation Through Employee Involvement-The Kaizen Teian Approach. CRC Press, 1995.
[4] F. Gonzalez-Aleu, E. M. Van Aken, J. Cross, and W. J. Glover, “Continuous improvement project within Kaizen: critical success factors in hospitals,” TQM J., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 335–355, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1108/TQM-12-2017-0175.
[5] M. Imai, Kaizen: the Key to Japan’s Competitive Success. 1986.
[6] O. I. S. El Dardery, “How Kaizen Costing Information Facilitates Decision Making Process,” no. December, pp. 16–18, 2017.
[7] P. Kumar and V. Pandey, “KAIZEN: A Case study in small scale organizations 1Pramod.” p. pp 133-136, 2013.
[8] M. O. Vento, J. L. G. Alcaraz, A. A. M. Macías, and V. M. Loya, “The impact of managerial commitment and kaizen benefits on companies,” J. Manuf. Technol. Manag., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 692–712, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1108/JMTM-02-2016-0021.
[9] J. a Farris et al., “An Empirical Investigation of Kaizen Event Effectiveness : Outcomes and Critical Success Factors Dissertation submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of,” Screening, 2006.
[10] F. G. Aleu and E. M. Van Aken, “Systematic literature review of critical success factors for continuous improvement projects,” 2015, doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-06-2015-0025.
[11] J.-I. Ker and Y. Wang, “Kaizen Policies in Healthcare Governance: Reducing Patient-flow Delays in Outpatient Surgery Setting through Healthcare Information Technology.”
[12] P. Bartel, “Kaizen in Outpatient Services at Kishwaukee Community Hospital Prepared by :” 2011.
[13] E. M. van Aken, J. A. Farris, W. J. Glover, and G. Letens, “A framework for designing, managing, and improving Kaizen event programs,” Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag., vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 641–667, 2010, doi: 10.1108/17410401011075648.
[14] J. Singh and H. Singh, “Kaizen Philosophy: A Review of Literature.,” ICFAI Journal of Operations Management, vol. 8, no. 2. pp. 51–72, 2009,
[Online]. Available: http://0-search.ebscohost.com.aupac.lib.athabascau.ca/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=url,ip,uid&db=bth&AN=39231631&site=ehost-live.
[15] R. Moore, “8-Kaizen. In: Selecting the Right Manufacturing Improvement Tools.” Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington, pp. 159–172, 2007.
[16] M. Imai, Gemba Kaizen : A Commonsense Low-cost Approach to Management. McGraw-Hill Professional, 1997.
[17] A. P. Brunet and S. New, “Kaizen in Japan: An empirical study,” Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag., vol. 23, no. 11–12, pp. 1426–1446, 2003, doi: 10.1108/01443570310506704.
[18] M. Nagaretinam, “Implementing Kobetsu Kaizen steps in manufacturing company Goodway Rubber Industries (M) Sdn Bhd.” Kolej Universiti Teknikal Kebangsaan Malaysia. Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering, p. 87, 2005.
[19] GRIPS Development Form, “Introducing KAIZEN in Africa,” Introducing kaizen in Africa, no. October. GRIPS Development Forum, pp. 1–11, 2009, doi: 10.1039/9781849735575-00001.
[20] W. D. Lawless, “Introduction to Kaizen Budgeting: Case Study.” p. 9, 2006.
[21] J. A. Farris, “An Empirical Investigation of Kaizen Event Effectiveness: Outcomes and Critical Success Factors,” 2006.
[22] W. J. Glover, E. M. Van Aken, J. A. Farris, T. L. Doolen, and J. M. Worley, “Kaizen event follow-up mechanisms and goal sustainability: preliminary results,” IIE Annual Conference and Expo 2008. pp. 1154–1159, 2008.
[23] THESSALONIKI, “Kaizen Definition & Principles in Brief a Concept & Tool for Employees Involvement.” pp. 1–42, 2006.
[24] M. Ghicajanu, “the Kaizen Philosophy in Romania,” Ann. Univ. Petrosani Econ., vol. IX, no. 1, pp. 275–278, 2009.
[25] T. L. Doolen, E. M. Van Aken, J. A. Farris, J. M. Worley, and J. Huwe, “Kaizen events and organizational performance: A field study,” Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag., vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 637–658, 2008, doi: 10.1108/17410400810916062.
[26] S. Kumar, A. Dhingra, and B. Singh, “Lean-Kaizen implementation: A roadmap for identifying continuous improvement opportunities in Indian small and medium sized enterprise,” J. Eng. Des. Technol., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 143–160, 2018, doi: 10.1108/JEDT-08-2017-0083.
[27] S. Taghizadegan, “Design for Lean/Kaizen Six Sigma,” Essentials of Lean Six Sigma. pp. 59–101, 2006, doi: 10.1016/b978-012370502-0/50008-4.
[28] S. Bell, Lean Enterprise Systems: Using It for Continuous Improvement. USA, Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2006.
[29] T. Omotayo, B. Awuzie, T. Egbelakin, and L. Obi, “AHP-Systems Thinking Analyses for Kaizen Costing Implementation in the Construction Industry,” Buildings‏, vol. 10, no. 12, p. 230, 2020.
[30] S. Jassem, Z. Zakaria, and A. Che Azmi, “Sustainability balanced scorecard architecture and environmental performance outcomes: a systematic review,” Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag., 2021, doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-12-2019-0582.
[31] R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton, “The Balanced Scorecard œ Measures That Drive Performance—, in: Harvard Business Review, January-February 1992,” 1992.
[32] Z. T. Kalender and Ö. Vayvay, “The Fifth Pillar of the Balanced Scorecard: Sustainability,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 235, no. October, pp. 76–83, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.027.
[33] W. G. Bremser and N. P. Barsky, “Utilizing the balanced scorecard for R&D performance measurement,” R D Manag., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 229–238, 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2004.00335.x.
[34] R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton, “The strategy-focused organization,” Strateg. Leadersh., vol. 29, no. 3, Jan. 2001, doi: 10.1108/sl.2001.26129cab.002.
[35] R. S. Kaplan, “Conceptual Foundations of the Balanced Scorecard Conceptual Foundations of the Balanced Scorecard 1,” 2010.
[36] K. Singh, Quantitative social research methods. Sage Publications Inc, 2007.
[37] M. Omoush, M. Moflih, and R. Almetrami, “Evaluating the Five Kaizen Success Measurements through Employees Work Improvement and its Effects on Overall Work and Quality of Services : Empirical Study of Insurance Companies in Jordan,” vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 43–52, 2020.
[38] L. Tsao, P. L. P. Rau, and L. Ma, “Development of a Quick Instrument Measuring Kaizen Culture (for Chinese),” Procedia Manuf., vol. 3, pp. 4708–4715, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.567.
[39]
[39] H. F. Kaiser, “An Index of Factorial Simplicity,” vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 31–36, 1974.
[40] M. S. Bartlett, “A Note on the Multiplying Factors for Various Chi Square Approximations,” J. R. Stat. Soc., vol. 16, pp. 296–298, 1954.