Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 31903
Technical, Environmental, and Financial Assessment for the Optimal Sizing of a Run-of-River Small Hydropower Project: A Case Study in Colombia

Authors: David Calderón Villegas, Thomas Kalitzky

Abstract:

Run-of-river (RoR) hydropower projects represent a viable, clean, and cost-effective alternative to dam-based plants and provide decentralized power production. However, RoR schemes’ cost-effectiveness depends on the proper selection of site and design flow, which is a challenging task because it requires multivariate analysis. In this respect, this study presents the development of an investment decision support tool for assessing the optimal size of an RoR scheme considering the technical, environmental, and cost constraints. The net present value (NPV) from a project perspective is used as an objective function for supporting the investment decision. The tool has been tested by applying it to an actual RoR project recently proposed in Colombia. The obtained results show that the optimum point in financial terms does not match the flow that maximizes energy generation from exploiting the river's available flow. For the case study, the flow that maximizes energy corresponds to a value of 5.1 m3/s. In comparison, an amount of 2.1 m3/s maximizes the investors NPV. Finally, a sensitivity analysis is performed to determine the NPV as a function of the debt rate changes and the electricity prices and the CapEx. Even for the worst-case scenario, the optimal size represents a positive business case with an NPV of 2.2 USD million and an internal rate of return (IRR) 1.5 times higher than the discount rate. 

Keywords: small hydropower, renewable energy, RoR schemes, optimal sizing, financial analysis

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 326

References:


[1] Cavazzini G, Santolin A, Pavesi G, Ardizzon G. Accurate estimation model for small and micro hydropower plants costs in hybrid energy systems modelling. Energy (Internet). 2016;103:746–57. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.024
[2] Mishra S, Singal SK, Khatod DK. Optimal installation of small hydropower plant - A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev (Internet). 2011;15(8):3862–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.008
[3] Liu J, Zuo J, Sun Z, Zillante G, Chen X. Sustainability in hydropower development - A case study. Renew Sustain Energy Rev (Internet). 2013;19:230–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.036
[4] Zarfl C, Lumsdon AE, Berlekamp J, Tydecks L, Tockner K. A global boom in hydropower dam construction. Aquat Sci. 2014;77(1):161–70.
[5] Paish O. Small hydro power: Technology and current status. Vol. 6, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2002. p. 537–56.
[6] Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Seyboth K, Eickemeier P, Matschoss P, et al. IPCC, 2011: Summary for Policymakers. In: IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation (Internet). Cambridge University Press. 2011. 246 p. Available from: http://srren.ipcc-wg3.de/report
[7] Bernhard Pelikan. Guide on How to Develop a Small Hydropower Plant. Eur Small Hydropower Assoc (Internet). 2004;296. Available from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.172.1731&rep=rep1&type=pdf
[8] Mishra S, Singal SK, Khatod DK. Costing of a Small Hydropower Projects. Int J Eng Technol. 2012;4(3):239–42.
[9] Campbell RJ. CRS Report for Congress Small Hydro and Low-Head Hydro Power Technologies and Prospects Specialist in Energy Policy. 2010; Available from: http://nepinstitute.org/get/CRS_Reports/CRS_Energy/Renewable_Fuels/Small_hydro_and_Low-head_hydro_power.pdf
[10] Singh VK, Singal SK. Operation of hydro power plants-a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev (Internet). 2017;69(November 2016):610–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.169
[11] Yildiz V, Vrugt JA. A toolbox for the optimal design of run-of-river hydropower plants. Vol. 111, Environmental Modelling and Software. 2019. p. 134–52.
[12] Voros NG, Kiranoudis CT, Maroulis ZB. Short-cut design of small hydroelectric plants. Renew Energy. 2000;19(4):545–63.
[13] Montanari R. Criteria for the economic planning of a low power hydroelectric plant. Renew energy. 2003;28(13):2129–45.
[14] de Almeida JL, Lejeune AGH, Marques JAAS, Cunha MC. OPAH a model for optimal design of multipurpose small hydropower plants. Adv Eng Softw. 2006;37(4):236–47.
[15] Basso S, Botter G. Streamflow variability and optimal capacity of run-of-river hydropower plants. 2012;48(August):1–13.
[16] Boodoo KS, Mcclain ME, Julia J, Lucia O, Lo O. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology Impacts of implementation of Colombian environmental flow methodologies on the flow regime and hydropower´ River, Colombia production of the Chinchina. 2014;14:267–84.
[17] Magaju D, Cattapan A, Franca M. Energy for Sustainable Development Identi fi cation of run-of-river hydropower investments in data scarce regions using global data. Energy Sustain Dev (Internet). 2020;58:30–41. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2020.07.001
[18] Carvajal CR, García-Muñiz AS, Cuartas BM. Assessing socioeconomic impacts of integrating distributed energy resources in electricity markets through input-output models. Energies. 2019;12(23):1–21.
[19] Kokkonen T, Koivusalo H, Karvonen T. A semi-distributed approach to rainfall-runoff modelling — a case study in a snow affected catchment. 2001;16(5):481–93.
[20] Ringkjøb HK, Haugan PM, Solbrekke IM. A review of modelling tools for energy and electricity systems with large shares of variable renewables. Renew Sustain Energy Rev (Internet). 2018;96(July):440–59. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.08.002
[21] Anagnostopoulos JS, Papantonis DE. Optimal sizing of a run-of-river small hydropower plant. Vol. 48, Energy Conversion and Management. 2007. p. 2663–70.
[22] Garegnani G, Sacchelli S, Balest J, Zambelli P. GIS-based approach for assessing the energy potential and the financial feasibility of run-off-river hydro-power in Alpine valleys. Appl Energy (Internet). 2018;216(February):709–23. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.043
[23] Fang X, Xu Y, Zhou Z. New correlations of single-phase friction factor for turbulent pipe flow and evaluation of existing single-phase friction factor correlations. 2011;241:897–902.
[24] Edition S. Fiberglass Pipe Design.
[25] Design TCSP, Bambei JH. Steel Penstocks: Second Edition (Internet). American Society of Civil Engineers; 2012. (ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice). Available from: https://books.google.com.br/books?id=SpUjebFpyC0C
[26] Hatata AY, El-Saadawi MM, Saad S. A feasibility study of small hydro power for selected locations in Egypt. Energy Strateg Rev (Internet). 2019;24(April 2018):300–13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.04.013
[27] Davitti A. Project cost modelling for hydropower schemes in. 2019; (February).
[28] 2017 Hydropower Market Report.pdf.
[29] Kost C, Shammugam S, Jülch V, Nguyen H, Schlegl T. Levelized Cost of Electricity- Renewable Energy Technologies. 2018;(March).