Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 31917
Vulnerability Analysis for Risk Zones Boundary Definition to Support a Decision Making Process at CBRNE Operations

Authors: Aliaksei Patsekha, Michael Hohenberger, Harald Raupenstrauch

Abstract:

An effective emergency response to accidents with chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, or explosive materials (CBRNE) that represent highly dynamic situations needs immediate actions within limited time, information and resources. The aim of the study is to provide the foundation for division of unsafe area into risk zones according to the impact of hazardous parameters (heat radiation, thermal dose, overpressure, chemical concentrations). A decision on the boundary values for three risk zones is based on the vulnerability analysis that covered a variety of accident scenarios containing the release of a toxic or flammable substance which either evaporates, ignites and/or explodes. Critical values are selected for the boundary definition of the Red, Orange and Yellow risk zones upon the examination of harmful effects that are likely to cause injuries of varying severity to people and different levels of damage to structures. The obtained results provide the basis for creating a comprehensive real-time risk map for a decision support at CBRNE operations.

Keywords: Boundary values, CBRNE threats, decision making process, hazardous effects, vulnerability analysis, risk zones.

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 217

References:


[1] Emergency response - World Health Organization. Available from https://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/hygiene/emergencies/ em2002chap4.pdf, accessed 01 March 2020.
[2] A. Baums, Response to CBRNE and human-caused accidents by using land and air robots. Automatic Control and Computer Sciences, 51(6) (2017) 410–416.
[3] CBRNE Health Information Resources - Section 1: Introduction to CBRNE Concepts. Available from https://www.nlm.nih.gov/dis_courses/ cbrne/01-000.html, accessed 01 March 2020.
[4] S. Marsella, N. Sciarretta, CBRN Events and Mass Evacuation Planning. Enhancing CBRNE Safety & Security: Proceedings of the SICC 2017 Conference, (2018) 353–363.
[5] Introduction to CBRNE Terrorism: An Awareness Primer and Preparedness Guide for Emergency Responders. Available from http://jumpjet.info/Emergency-Preparedness/Disaster-Mitigation/ NBC/Introduction_to_CBRNE_Terrorism.pdf, accessed 02 March 2020.
[6] Oesterreichisches Rotes Kreuz, Rahmenvorschrift Rettungsdienst, 226. Praesidentenkonferenz, 2014
[7] J.-L. Vincent, E. Abraham, P. Kochanek, F.A. Moore, M.P. Fink, Textbook of Critical Care, seventh ed., Elsevier - Health Sciences Division, Philadelphia, United States, 2017.
[8] Initial operational response to a CBRN incident. Available from https://www.jesip.org.uk/uploads/media/pdf/CBRN%20JOPs/ IOR_Guidance_V2_July_2015.pdf, accessed 03 March 2020.
[9] G.G. Noll, M.S. Hildebrand, G.D. Rudner, R. Schnepp, Hazardous materials: Managing the incident, fourth ed., Jones & Bartlett Learning, Burlington, MA, 2019.
[10] C.J.H. van den Bosch, R.A.P.M. Weterings (Eds.), Methods for the calculation of physical effects: due to releases of hazardous materials (liquids and gases) (‘Yellow Book’), third ed., Committee for the Prevention of Disasters, The Hague, 2005.
[11] U. Hauptmanns, Process and Plant Safety, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014.
[12] B. Yoo, S.D. Choi, Emergency Evacuation Plan for Hazardous Chemicals Leakage Accidents Using GIS-based Risk Analysis Techniques in South Korea. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(11) (2019) 1948.
[13] Y. Ghajari, A. Alesheikh, M. Modiri, R. Hosnavi, M. Abbasi, Spatial Modelling of Urban Physical Vulnerability to Explosion Hazards Using GIS and Fuzzy MCDA. Sustainability, 9(7) (2017) 1274.
[14] J. Burman, L. Jonsson, Issues when linking computational fluid dynamics for urban modeling to toxic load models: The need for further research. Atmospheric Environment, 104 (2015) 112–124.
[15] M. Ciccotti, F. Spagnolo, M. Palmery, Safety in the Transport of Hazardous Substances in Residential Areas: Cases of the Release of TIC (Chlorine, Propane, and Butane) at Low Temperatures. Enhancing CBRNE Safety & Security: Proceedings of the SICC 2017 Conference, (2018) 71–79.
[16] C.J.H. van den Bosch, L. Twilt, R.A.P.M. Weterings, et al., Methods for the determination of possible damage to people and objects resulting from releases of hazardous materials (Green Book), thirst ed., Committee for the Prevention of Disasters, Den Haag, 1992.
[17] S. Mannan (Ed.), Lees’ Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Hazard Identification, Assessment and Control, fourth ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2012.
[18] Maximum allowable exposure to different heat radiation levels. Available from http://content.publicatiereeksgevaarlijkestoffen.nl/documents/PGS29/ Raport%20IFV_20160509_Heat_radiation_contours_final.pdf, accessed 05 February 2020.
[19] Access Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) Values. Available from https://www.epa.gov/aegl/access-acute-exposure-guideline-levels-aegls-values, accessed 12 February 2020.