A Mixed-Methods Approach to Developing and Evaluating an SME Business Support Model for Innovation in Rural England

Authors: Steve Fish, Chris Lambert

Abstract:

Cumbria is a geo-political county in Northwest England within which the Lake District National Park, a UNESCO World Heritage site is located. Whilst the area has a formidable reputation for natural beauty and historic assets, the innovation ecosystem is described as ‘patchy’ for a number of reasons. The county is one of the largest in England by area and is sparsely populated. This paper describes the needs, development and delivery of an SME business-support programme funded by the European Regional Development Fund, Lancaster University and the University of Cumbria. The Cumbria Innovations Platform (CUSP) Project has been designed to respond to the nuanced needs of SMEs in this locale, whilst promoting the adoption of research and innovation. CUSP utilizes a funnel method to support rural businesses with access to university innovation intervention. CUSP has been built on a three-tier model: Communicate, Collaborate and Create. The paper describes this project in detail and presents results in terms of output indicators achieved, a beneficiary telephone survey and wider economic forecasts. From a pragmatic point-of-view, the paper provides experiences and reflections of those people who are delivering and evaluating knowledge exchange. The authors discuss some of the benefits, challenges and implications for both policy makers and practitioners. Finally, the paper aims to serve as an invitation to others who may consider adopting a similar method of university-industry collaboration in their own region.

Keywords: Regional business support, rural business support, university-industry collaboration, collaborative R&D, SMEs, knowledge exchange.

References:

[1] Bercovitz, J. and Feldman, M., (2006). Entpreprenerial universities and technology transfer: A conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), pp.175-188.
[2] Conceicao, P., Heitor, M.V. and Oliveira, P.M., (1998). Expectations for the university in the knowledge-based economy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 58(3), pp.203-214.
[3] Siegel, D.S., Veugelers, R. and Wright, M., (2007). Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications. Oxford review of economic policy, 23(4), pp.640-660.
[4] Huggins, R. and Johnston, A., (2009). The economic and innovation contribution of universities: a regional perspective. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27(6), pp.1088-1106.
[5] Collier, A., Gray, B.J. and Ahn, M.J., (2011). Enablers and barriers to university and high technology SME partnerships. Small Enterprise Research, 18(1), pp.2-18.
[6] Cumbria Local Enterprise Partnership (2019). Cumbria’s Local Industrial Strategy
[7] Office for National Statistics, (2018). Population estimates for the UK, England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland: mid-2017.
[8] Cumbria Rural and Visitor Economy Growth Plan, (2017).
[9] Chesbrough, H., (2004). Managing open innovation. Research-Technology Management, 47(1), pp.23-26.
[10] Shucksmith, M., (2012). Future directions in rural development?. Dunfermline: Carnegie UK Trust.
[11] Universities, U.K., (2010). The future of research. London: Universities UK.
[12] Terämä, E., Smallman, M., Lock, S.J., Johnson, C. and Austwick, M.Z., (2016). Beyond academia–Interrogating research impact in the research excellence framework. PloS one, 11(12).