Implementing Pro-Poor Policies for Poverty Alleviation: The Case of the White Paper on Families in South Africa
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32856
Implementing Pro-Poor Policies for Poverty Alleviation: The Case of the White Paper on Families in South Africa

Authors: P. Mbecke


The role of the government to tangibly alleviate poverty, improve and sustain the quality of people’s lives remains a “work in progress” twenty-two years after the dawn of democracy in South Africa despite a host of socio-economic programs and pro-poor policies and legislations. This paper assesses the development process and the implementation of the White Paper on Families in South Africa as one of the pro-poor policies intended to curb poverty and redress the imbalances of the apartheid regime. The paper is the result of a qualitative implementation research theory facilitated through in-depth interviews with social work managers complemented by literature and policy review techniques. It investigates the level of basic knowledge and understanding as well as the implementation challenges of the White Paper on Families as causes of its failure. The paper emphasizes the importance of the family-centered approach in the implementation of pro-poor policies. To facilitate the understanding of the White Paper on Families by its users, the Department of Social Development needs take stock of the identified challenges of its implementation so as to facilitate its success in fostering positive family well-being that will directly contributes to the overall socio-economic development of South Africa.

Keywords: Poverty alleviation, pro-poor policy, social development, social welfare, South Africa.

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 535


[1] Boundless. 2016. “Policy Implementation.” Boundless Political Science. Boundless, 17 Jun. 2016. Retrieved 28 June 2016 from
[2] Conteh, C. 2011. Policy implementation in multilevel environments: Economic development in Northern Ontario, Canadian Public Administration (Journal) Volume 54, Issue 1, pages 121–142, March 2011.
[3] DeGroff, A., and Cargo, M. (2009). Policy implementation: Implications for evaluation. In J. M. Ottoson & P. Hawe (Eds.), Knowledge utilization, diffusion, implementation, transfer, and translation: Implications for evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 124, 47–60.
[4] Department of Social Development. White Paper on Families 2013:
[5] Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M and Wallace, F. 2005. Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature. University of South Florida. Tampa, Florida.
[6] Gumede, V. 2008. Public policy making in a post-apartheid South Africa: A preliminary perspective, Journal of Development Studies paper, 38, 2, pp 7-23.
[7] Hochfeld, T. 2007. Missed opportunities: Conservative discourses in the draft National Family Policy of South Africa. International Social work, 50(1): 79-91.
[8] Laerd Dissertation, online. Purposive Sampling:
[9] Lipsky, M. 1969. Toward a Theory of Street-Level Bureaucracy (IRP Discussion Papers No. 48-69) (p. 45). Madison, WI: Institute for Research on Poverty (IRP), University of Wisconsin. Retrieved on 02 July 2016 from
[10] Lipsky, M. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
[11] Mbecke, P. 2016. The Family Observatory for Preventive and Developmental Social Work in South Africa: An Investigation of Implementation Challenges. Focus Group Discussions Report. Department of Economics. University of the Free State (not published).
[12] Micallef-Trigona, P. 2014. What are the challenges faced in the implementation of policy? Retrieved 28 June 2016 from
[13] O'Toole Jr, L. J. 2000. Research on policy implementation: Assessment and prospects. Journal of public administration research and theory. Volume 10. Issue 2. Pages 263-288. Oxford University Press
[14] Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom J. P., Duan, N. & Hoagwood, K. 2013. Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, volume 42, pages533–544(2015)Cite this article
[15] Peters, D. H., Adam, T., Alonge, O., Agyepong, I. A., Tran, N. 2013. Implementation research: what it is and how to do it. BMJ 2013;347:f6753. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f6753 (Published 20 November 2013). Retried on 29 June 2016 from:
[16] Richter, L., Amoateng, Y. and Makiwane, M. 2003. Describing Families for Policy: Literature, Archival and Secondary Research to Support the Development of Family Policy. Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria.
[17] Roh, K. A. 2012. "Challenges to Policy Implementation: An Examination of an Integrated Health Care Delivery System Demonstration Project". Honors Projects. Paper 38. Retrieved on 27 June 2016 from:
[18] Spakes, P. 1984. National family policy and its implications for alternative family lifestyles. Alternative Lifestyles, 6 (4): 230- 242.
[19] Thomlison, B and Thomlison R.J, A System Approach to Strengthening Families. In Dulmus, C.N. and Sowers, K.M. 2012. Social work Fields of Practices: Historical Trends, Professional Issues, and Future Opportunities. Somerset, US: Wiley, 2012. ProQuest ebrary. Web. 15 March 2016.