Exploring Utility and Intrinsic Value among UAE Arabic Teachers in Integrating M-Learning

Authors: Dina Tareq Ismail, Alexandria A. Proff

Abstract:

The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is a nation seeking to advance in all fields, particularly education. One area of focus for UAE 2021 agenda is to restructure UAE schools and universities by equipping them with highly developed technology. The agenda also advises educational institutions to prepare students with applicable and transferrable Information and Communication Technology (ICT) skills. Despite the emphasis on ICT and computer literacy skills, there exists limited empirical data on the use of M-Learning in the literature. This qualitative study explores the motivation of higher primary Arabic teachers in private schools toward implementing and integrating M-Learning apps in their classrooms. This research employs a phenomenological approach through the use of semistructured interviews with nine purposefully selected Arabic teachers. The data were analyzed using a content analysis via multiple stages of coding: open, axial, and thematic. Findings reveal three primary themes: (1) Arabic teachers with high levels of procedural knowledge in ICT are more motivated to implement M-Learning; (2) Arabic teachers' perceptions of self-efficacy influence their motivation toward implementation of M-Learning; (3) Arabic teachers implement M-Learning when they possess high utility and/or intrinsic value in these applications. These findings indicate a strong need for further training, equipping, and creating buy-in among Arabic teachers to enhance their ICT skills in implementing M-Learning. Further, given the limited availability of M-Learning apps designed for use in the Arabic language on the market, it is imperative that developers consider designing M-Learning tools that Arabic teachers, and Arabic-speaking students, can use and access more readily. This study contributes to closing the knowledge gap on teacher-motivation for implementing M-Learning in their classrooms in the UAE.

Keywords: ICT Skills, M-Learning, self-efficacy, teachermotivation.

References:

[1] Acharya, A. S., Prakash, A., Saxena, P., & Nigam, A. (2013). Sampling: Why and how of it. Indian Journal of Medical Specialties, 4(2), 330-333.
[2] Al-Awidi, H. M., & Alghazo, I. M. (2012). The effect of student teaching experience on preserve elementary teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration in the UAE. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(5), 923-941.
[3] Alghazo, I. (2006). Quality of internet use by teachers in the United Arab Emirates. Education, 126(3), 769–781.
[4] Al Maktoum, M. B. R., & Bishtawi, A. (2006). My vision: Challenges in the race for excellence. London: Motivate.
[5] Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (Complete edition). New York, NY: Longmans
[6] Ashcroft, R. J., & Imrie, A. C. (2014). Learning vocabulary with digital flashcards. In N. Sonda & A. Krause (Eds.), JALT2013 Conference Proceedings. Tokyo: JALT.
[7] Aydin, S., & Boz, Y. (2010). Preservice elementary science teachers’ science teaching efficacy beliefs and their sources. Elementary Education Online, 9(2), 694–704.
[8] Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986, 23-28.
[9] Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Selfefficacy beliefs of adolescents, 5(1), 307-337.
[10] Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman & Company
[11] BARR, Blair. Checking the effectiveness of Quizlet® as a tool for vocabulary learning. 2016. PhD Thesis.
[12] Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2011). Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide. London: Sage.
[13] Bloor, M., & Wood, F. (2006). Keywords in qualitative methods: A vocabulary of research concepts. London: SAGE.
[14] Britner, S., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 485–499.
[15] Burns, R. B. (2000). Introduction to research methods (4th ed.). Australia: Longman.
[16] Byrne, R. (2013). Free technology for teachers: Kahoot! - create quizzes and surveys your students can answer on any device. Retrieved January 17, 2015, from http://www.freetech4teachers.com/2013/11/kahootcreate- quizzes-and-surveysyour.html#.VLnc78buzuU
[17] Choy, D., Wong, A., & Gao, P. (2008). Singapore’s preservice teachers’ perspectives in integrating information and communication technology (ICT) during practicum.
[18] Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. New York: Routledge.
[19] Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. London: Sage.
[20] Creswell, J. W. (2013) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches / John W. Creswell. — 4th ed. ISBN 978-1- 4522-2609-5
[21] Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
[22] Cross, J. (2014). Introduction to Kahoot for your classroom assessments. Retrieved January 31, 2015, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYfoRRtLXys
[23] Flick, U. (2011). Designing qualitative research. London; Los Angeles
[24] Delacruz S. Using Nearpod in elementary guided reading groups. TechTrends: Linking
[25] Research & Practice to Improve Learning. 2014;58(5):62-69. doi:10.1007/s11528-014-0787-9.
[26] Dellos, R. (2015). Kahoot! A digital game resource for learning. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(4), 49-52.
[27] Dowling, P., & Brown, A. (2010). Doing Research/Reading Research: Re-Interrogating Education. Oxford: Taylor & Francis.
[28] Eccles, J. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. Achievement and achievement motives.
[29] Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 1017–1095). New York: Wile
[30] Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132
[31] Ewen, M. (2015). Educational psychology and the “UAE Vision 2021”. In Mental health and psychological practice in the United Arab Emirates (pp. 181-188). Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
[32] Glesne, C. (2011) Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
[33] Hakkarainen, K., Muukonen, H., Lipponen, L., Ilomäki, L., Rahikainen, M., & Lehtinen, E. (2001). Teachers’ information and communication technology (ICT) skills and practices of using ICT. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(2), 181-197
[34] Hendricks, B. L., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention. Journal of educational psychology, 102(4), 880.
[35] Ishtaiwa-Dweikat, F. F., & Aburezeq, I. M. (2016). The Use of Google Apps to Support Teaching and Learning: A UAE Case Study. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 11(4), 1-21.
[36] Johnson, S., & Radhakrishnan, N. (2017). Academic use of smart phones among the students of business schools in UAE-a study. KIIT Journal of library and Information Management, 4(1), 32-36.
[37] Kahoot! Game-based blended learning & classroom response system. (2014). Retrieved
[38] January 17, 2015, from https://getkahoot.com Thomas, C. (2014). Kahoot! Retrieved January 17, 2015, from https://www.graphite.org/website/kahoot
[39] Ling, C., Harnish, D., & Shehab, R. (2014). Educational apps: using mobile applications to enhance student learning of statistical concepts. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 24(5), 532-543.
[40] Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[41] Merriam, S.B., & Tisdell, E.J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
[42] Mezirow, J. (1978). Perspective transformation. Adult education, 28(2), 100-110.
[43] Nagengast, B., Marsh, H. W., Scalas, L. F., Xu, M. K., Hau, K. T., & Trautwein, U. (2011). Who took the “×” out of expectancy-value theory? A psychological mystery, a substantive-methodological synergy, and a cross-national generalization. Psychological science, 22(8), 1058-1066.
[44] Pegrum, M., Oakley, G., & Faulkner, R. (2013). Schools going mobile: A study of the adoption of mobile handheld technologies in Western Australian independent schools. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1).
[45] Pekrun, R. (1992). Expectancy-value theory of anxiety: Overview and implications.
[46] Schwab, K. (2013). Nearpod. Dance Teacher, 35(2), 22.
[47] Robson, C. (2002). Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner researchers. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
[48] Russel B. H. (1988). Research methods in cultural anthropology. Qualitative and.
[49] Schwab, K. (2013). Nearpod. Dance Teacher, 35(2), 22.
[50] Stage, F., & Manning, K. (2003). What is your question?. In Research in the college context: Approaches and methods (pp. 3-18). Routledge
[51] Van Nes, F., Abma, T., Jonsson, H., & Deeg, D. (2010). Language differences in qualitative research: is meaning lost in translation?. European journal of ageing, 7(4), 313-316.
[52] Wiseman, A. W., & Anderson, E. (2014). Developing innovation and entrepreneurial skills in youth through mass education: The example of ICT in the UAE. In International educational innovation and public sector entrepreneurship. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.