Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32451
Contraception in Guatemala, Panajachel and the Surrounding Areas: Barriers Affecting Women’s Contraceptive Usage

Authors: Natasha Bhate


Contraception is important in helping to reduce maternal and infant mortality rates by allowing women to control the number and spacing in-between their children. It also reduces the need for unsafe abortions. Women worldwide use contraception; however, the contraceptive prevalence rate is still relatively low in Central American countries like Guatemala. There is also an unmet need for contraception in Guatemala, which is more significant in rural, indigenous women due to barriers preventing contraceptive use. The study objective was to investigate and analyse the current barriers women face, in Guatemala, Panajachel and the surrounding areas, in using contraception, with a view of identifying ways to overcome these barriers. This included exploring the contraceptive barriers women believe exist and the influence of males in contraceptive decision making. The study took place at a charity in Panajachel, Guatemala, and had a cross-sectional, qualitative design to allow an in-depth understanding of information gathered. This particular study design was also chosen to help inform the charity with qualitative research analysis, in view of their intent to create a local reproductive health programme. A semi-structured interview design, including photo facilitation to improve cross-cultural communication, with interpreter assistance, was utilized. A pilot interview was initially conducted with small improvements required. Participants were recruited through purposive and convenience sampling. The study host at the charity acted as a gatekeeper; participants were identified through attendance of the charity’s women’s-initiative programme workshops. 20 participants were selected and agreed to study participation with two not attending; a total of 18 participants were interviewed in June 2017. Interviews were audio-recorded and data were stored on encrypted memory sticks. Framework analysis was used to analyse the data using NVivo11 software. The University of Leeds granted ethical approval for the research. Religion, language, the community, and fear of sickness were examples of existing contraceptive barrier themes recognized by many participants. The influence of men was also an important barrier identified, with themes of machismo and abuse preventing contraceptive use in some women. Women from more rural areas were believed to still face barriers which some participants did not encounter anymore, such as distance and affordability of contraceptives. Participants believed that informative workshops in various settings were an ideal method of overcoming existing contraceptive barriers and allowing women to be more empowered. The involvement of men in such workshops was also deemed important by participants to help reduce their negative influence in contraceptive usage. Overall, four recommendations following this study were made, including contraceptive educational courses, a gender equality campaign, couple-focused contraceptive workshops, and further qualitative research to gain a better insight into men’s opinions regarding women using contraception.

Keywords: Barrier, contraception, machismo, religion.

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 486


[1] National Health Service. Contraception Guide. (Online). 2015. (Accessed on 04/04/17). Available from:
[2] United Nations. Trends in Contraceptive Use Worldwide 2015. (Online). New York; United Nations, 2015. (Accessed on 04/04/17). Available from:
[3] World Health Organisation. Family planning/ Contraception. (Online). 2016. (Accessed on 07/04/17). Available from:
[4] Campbell O and Graham W. Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works. The Lancet. (Online). 2006, 368(9543), 1284-1299. (Accessed on 07/04/17). Available from:
[5] Guttmacher Institute. Family Planning Can Reduce High Infant Mortality Levels. (Online). 2002. (Accessed on 12/04/17). Available from:
[6] Scrimshaw S. Infant Mortality and Behaviour in the Regulation of Family Size. Population and Development Review. (Online). 1978, 4(3), 383-403. (Accessed on 13/04/17). Available from:
[7] Grimes D, Benson J et al. Unsafe Abortion: the preventable pandemic. The Lancet. (Online). 2006, 368(9550), 1908-1919. (Accessed on 17/04/17). Available from:
[8] United Nations Women. SDG 3: Ensure health lives and promote well-being for all at all ages. (Online). 2016. (Accessed on 17/04/17). Available from:
[9] United Nations. Sustainable Development Goals-Goal 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages. (Online). 2017. (Accessed on 17/04/17). Available from:
[10] Hubacher D, Suazo M, Terrell S and Pinel M. Examining the Increasing Prevalence of Traditional Contraceptive Methods in Honduras. International Family Planning Perspectives. (Online). 1996, 22 (no issue number), 163-168. (Accessed on 21/04/17). Available from:
[11] Central Intelligence Agency. The World Factbook-Central American and Caribbean: Guatemala. (Online). 2017. (Accessed on 21/04/17). Available from:
[12] World Health Organisation. Countries: Guatemala. (Online). 2016. (Accessed on 25/04/17). Available from:
[13] Population Pyramids. Population Pyramids of the World from 1950 to 2100- Guatemala. (Online). 2016. (Accessed on 25/04/17). Available from:
[14] World Health Organisation. Infertility definitions and terminology. (Online). 2017. (Accessed on 25/04/17). Available from:
[15] The World Bank. Maternal Mortality Ratio. (Online). 2016. (Accessed on 03/05/17). Available from:
[16] United Nations. Goal 5: Improve Maternal Health. (Online). (no date). (Accessed on 03/05/17). Available from:
[17] Social Watch. Faced with the 2030 Agenda: Guatemala. (Online). 2016. (Accessed on 03/05/17). Available from:
[18] US Agency for International Development and MEASURE Evaluation. Family Planning in Guatemala The Achievements of 50 Years. (Online). Chapel Hill: Measure Evaluation, 2015. (Accessed on 11/05/17). Available from:
[19] United Nations. World Contraceptive Use 2014. (Online). (no place): United Nations, 2014. (Accessed on 11/05/17). Available from:
[20] Monteith R et al. Reproductive, Maternal, and Child Health in Central America: Trends and Challenges facing Women and Children. Atlanta: Government Printing Office, 2006.
[21] Rosen JE, Pappa S, Vazzano A and Neason E. Comparative Analysis: Policies Affecting Family Planning Access for Young Women in Guatemala, Malawi, and Nepal. (Online). Washington DC: Health Policy Plus, 2017. (Accessed on 14/05/17). Available from:
[22] Richardson E, Allison KR, Gesink D and Berry A. Barriers to accessing and using contraception in highland Guatemala: the development of a family planning self-efficacy scale. Open Access Journal of Contraception. (Online). 2016, 2016(7), 77-87. (Accessed on 14/05/17). Available from:
[23] United Nations Women. SDG 3: Ensure health lives and promote well-being for all at all ages. (Online). 2016. (Accessed on 17/04/17). Available from:
[24] De Broe S, Hinde A, Matthews Z and Padmadas S. Diversity in family planning use among ethnic groups in Guatemala. Journal of Biosocial Science. (Online). 2005, 37(3), 301-317. (Accessed on 15/05/17). Available from:
[25] Seiber E and Bertrand J. Access as a factor in differential contraceptive use between Mayans and Ladinos in Guatemala. Health Policy and Planning. (Online). 2002, 17(2), 167-177. (Accessed on 15/05/17). Available from:
[26] Bertrand J, Seiber E and Escudero G. Contraceptive Dynamics in Guatemala: 1978-1998. International Family Planning Perspectives. (Online). 2001, 27(3), 112-118+136. (Accessed on 15/05/17). Available from:
[27] Santiso-Galvez R and Bertrand J. The Delayed Contraceptive Revolution in Guatemala. Human Organisation. (Online). 2004, 63(1), 57-67. (Accessed on 15/05/17). Available from:
[28] Wehr H and Tum S. When a girl's decision involves the community: the realities of adolescent Maya girls' lives in rural indigenous Guatemala. Reproductive Health Matters. (Online). 2013, 21(41), 136-142. (Accessed on 15/05/17). Available from:
[29] Speizer I, Whittle L and Carter M. Gender Relations and Reproductive Decision Making in Honduras. International Family Planning Perspectives. (Online). 2005, 31(3), 131-139. (Accessed on 26/06/17). Available from:
[30] Berglund S et al. The background of adolescent pregnancies in Nicaragua: A qualitative approach. Social Science and Medicine. (Online). 1997, 44(1), 1-12. (Accessed on 26/06/17). Available from:
[31] Ingoldsby B. The Latin American Family: Familism vs. Machismo. Journal of Comparative Family Studies. (Online). 1991, 22(1), 57-62. (Accessed on 29/06/17). Available from:
[32] Schooley J et al. Factors influencing health care-seeking behaviours among Mayan women in Guatemala. Midwifery. (Online). 2009, 25(4), 411-421. (Accessed on 26/06/17). Available from:
[33] Pardilla A. Patriarchal Power and Gender-Based Violence in Guatemala and El Salvador. Global Majority E-Journal. (Online). 2016, 7(1), 38-51. (Accessed on 29/06/17). Available from:
[34] Hinshaw R. Panajachel: A Guatemalan Town in Thirty-Year Perspective. USA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1975.
[35] The University of Kansas: Centre for Latin American and Caribbean Studies. Kaqchikel. (Online). (no date) (Accessed on 18/07/17). Available from:
[36] Laruta Maya Online. Lake Atitlan Map. (Online). 2014. (Accessed on 06/08/17). Available from:
[37] Green J and Thorogood N. Qualitative Methods for Health Research. Third Edition. London: SAGE Publications, 2014.
[38] Teherani A et al. Choosing a Qualitative Research Approach. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. (Online). 2015, 7(4), 669-670. (Accessed on 18/07/17). Available from:
[39] Edwards R. A critical examination of the use of interpreters in the qualitative research process. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. (Online). 1998, 24(1), 197-208. (Accessed on 18/07/17). Available from:
[40] Flick U. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. 5th edition. London: Sage Publications Ltd, 2014.
[41] Miller W and Crabtree B. Doing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc, 1999.
[42] Wengraf T. Qualitative Research Interviewing. London: Sage Publications Ltd, 2001.
[43] Clark-Ibanez M. Framing the Social World with Photo-Elicitation Interviews. American Behavioural Scientist. (Online). 2004, 47(12), 1507–27. (Accessed on 21/07/17). Available from:
[44] Collier J. Visual Anthropology: Photography as a Research Method. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1967.
[45] Samuels J. Breaking the Ethnographer’s Frames. American Behavioural Scientist. (Online). 2004, 47(12), 1528–50. (Accessed on 21/07/17). Available from:
[46] Lacey A and Luff D. Qualitative Data Analysis. (Online). East Midlands/Yorkshire and Humber: The NIHR RDS, 2009. (Accessed on 23/07/17). Available from:
[47] QSR International. What is NVivo? (Online). 2017. (Accessed on 23/07/17). Available from:
[48] Squires A. Methodological Challenges in Cross-Language Qualitative Research: A Research Review. International Journal of Nursing Studies. (Online). 2009, 46(2), 277-287. (Accessed on 23/07/17). Available from:
[49] Furnham A. Response Bias, Social Desirability and Dissimulation. Personality and Individual Differences. (Online). 1986, 7(3), 385-400. (Accessed on 23/07/17). Available from:
[50] Burnand P. A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse Education Today. (Online). 1991, 11(6), 461-466. (Accessed on 23/07/17). Available from:
[51] Tong A, Sainsbury P and Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. (Online). 2007, 19(6), 349-357. (Accessed on 23/07/17). Available from:
[52] Williamson L, Parkes A, Wight D, Petticrew M and Hart G. Limits to modern contraceptive use among young women in developing countries: a systematic review of qualitative research. Reproductive Health. (Online). 2009, 6(3), (no pagination). (Accessed on 24/07/17). Available from:
[53] Gilliam M, Warden M, Goldstein C and Tapia B. Concerns about contraceptive side effects among young Latinas: A focus-group approach. Contraception. (Online). 2004, 70(4), 299-305. (Accessed on 24/07/17). Available from:
[54] Guttmacher Institute. Sexual and Reproductive Health of Young Women in Guatemala. (Online). 2014. (Accessed on 25/07/17). Available from:
[55] Guttmacher Institute. Demystifying Data Factsheet: Sexual and Reproductive Health of Young Women in Guatemala. (Online). New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2014. (Accessed on 25/07/17). Available from:
[56] Clulow M. Sexual and Reproductive Rights in Central America: Towards an Agenda for Action. (Online). United Kingdom: Community Funds, 2005. (Accessed on 25/07/17). Available from:
[57] Social Institutions and Gender Index. Guatemala. (Online). 2014. (Accessed on 26/07/17). Available from:
[58] Duggan C, Bailey C and Guillerot J. Reparations for Sexual and Reproductive Violence: Prospects for Achieving Gender Justice in Guatemala and Peru. International Journal of Transitional Violence. (Online). 2008, 2(2), 192-213. (Accessed on 26/07/17). Available from:
[59] Barker G, Ricardo C and Nascimento M. Engaging men and boys in changing gender-based inequity in health: Evidence from programme interventions. (Online). Geneva: World Health Organisation, 2007. (Accessed on 26/07/17). Available from:
[60] Ricardo C, Nascimento M, Fonseca V and Segundo M. Program H and Program M: Engaging young men and empowering young women to promote gender equality and health. (Online). Washington DC: PAHO/Best Practices in Gender and Health, 2010. (Accessed on 26/07/17). Available from:
[61] United Nations Women. Americas and the Caribbean: Guatemala. (Online). (no date). (Accessed on 26/07/17). Available from:
[62] UNICEF. UNICEF Annual Report 2014: Guatemala. (Online). (No place): UNICEF, 2014. (Accessed on 28/07/17). Available from:
[63] Pew Research Centre. Religion in Latin America- Chapter 5: Social Attitudes. (Online). 2014. (Accessed on 28/07/17). Available from:
[64] Sternberg P. Challenging machismo: Promoting sexual and reproductive health with Nicaraguan men. Gender and Development. (Online). 2010, 8(1), 89-99. (Accessed on 28/07/17). Available from:
[65] Agha S. Intentions to use contraceptives in Pakistan: implications for behavior change campaigns. BMC Public Health. (Online). 2010, 10(450), (no pagination). (Accessed on 28/07/17). Available from:
[66] Shattuck D et al. Encouraging Contraceptive Uptake by Motivating Men to Communicate About Family Planning: The Malawi Male Motivator Project. American Journal of Public Health. (Online). 2011, 101(6), 1089-1095. (Accessed on 30/07/17). Available from:
[67] Tilahun T, Coene G, Temmerman M and Degomme O. Couple based family planning education: changes in male involvement and contraceptive use among married couples in Jimma Zone, Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. (Online). 2015, 15(682), (no pagination). (Accessed on 30/07/17). Available from:
[68] Amatya R et al. The effect of husband counselling on NORPLANT contraceptive acceptability in Bangladesh. Contraception. (Online). 1994, 50(3), 263-273. (Accessed on 31/07/17). Available from:
[69] International Planned Parenthood Federation. APROFAM. (Online). 2017. (Accessed on 08/08/17). Available from:
[70] Mays N and Pope C. Education and Debate: Qualitative research in healthcare- Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ. (Online). 2000; 320: 50. (Accessed on 31/07/17). Available from: