Interoperability Maturity Models for Consideration When Using School Management Systems in South Africa: A Scoping Review
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32856
Interoperability Maturity Models for Consideration When Using School Management Systems in South Africa: A Scoping Review

Authors: Keneilwe Maremi, Marlien Herselman, Adele Botha


The main purpose and focus of this paper are to determine the Interoperability Maturity Models to consider when using School Management Systems (SMS). The importance of this is to inform and help schools with knowing which Interoperability Maturity Model is best suited for their SMS. To address the purpose, this paper will apply a scoping review to ensure that all aspects are provided. The scoping review will include papers written from 2012-2019 and a comparison of the different types of Interoperability Maturity Models will be discussed in detail, which includes the background information, the levels of interoperability, and area for consideration in each Maturity Model. The literature was obtained from the following databases: IEEE Xplore and Scopus, the following search engines were used: Harzings, and Google Scholar. The topic of the paper was used as a search term for the literature and the term ‘Interoperability Maturity Models’ was used as a keyword. The data were analyzed in terms of the definition of Interoperability, Interoperability Maturity Models, and levels of interoperability. The results provide a table that shows the focus area of concern for each Maturity Model (based on the scoping review where only 24 papers were found to be best suited for the paper out of 740 publications initially identified in the field). This resulted in the most discussed Interoperability Maturity Model for consideration (Information Systems Interoperability Maturity Model (ISIMM) and Organizational Interoperability Maturity Model for C2 (OIM)).

Keywords: Interoperability, Interoperability Maturity Model, School Management System, scoping review.

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 728


[1] Chapurlat, V. and N. Daclin, System interoperability: definition and proposition of interface model in MBSE Context. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2012. 45(6): p. 1523-1528.
[2] Weber-Jahnke, J., L. Peyton, and T. Topaloglou, eHealth system interoperability. Information Systems Frontiers, 2012. 14(1): p. 1-3.
[3] Caralli, R., M. Knight, and A. Montgomery, Maturity models 101: A primer for applying maturity models to smart grid security, resilience, and interoperability. 2012, Carnegie-Mellon Univ Pittsburgh PA Software Engineering Inst.
[4] Knight, M., et al. Maturity model for advancing smart grid interoperability. in 2013 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT). 2013. IEEE.
[5] Carvalho, J.V., R.H. Pereira, and A. Rocha. Maturity models of education information systems and technologies: a systematic literature review. in 2018 13th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI). 2018. IEEE.
[6] Sarker, A., Online school management system. 2016.
[7] Awadallah, K., School Management System Based on Web. 2016, University of Palestine, College of Applied Engineering and Urban Planning ….
[8] Al-hayek, A., E-School–School Management System. 2016, Faculty of Information Technology.
[9] Masinde, M. and G.M. Muriithi. Cloud SAMS: Cloud computing solution for public schools within South Africa's ‘second economy’. 2016. IEEE Xplore: IST-Africa Week Conference.
[10] Gxwati, N.I., The education management information system of the Free State Department of Education: a systems analysis. 2011, Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch.
[11] Kuriakose, E.B., A cost effective school management system for disadvantaged schools in the Free State province using the software as a service (SaaS) delivery model. 2014, (Bloemfontein?): Central University of Technology, Free State.
[12] Muriithi, G.M. and M. Masinde. Cloud SAMS: Cloud computing solution for public schools within South Africa's ‘second economy’. in 2016 IST-Africa Week Conference. 2016. IEEE.
[13] Gürdür, D. and F. Asplund, A systematic review to merge discourses: Interoperability, integration and cyber-physical systems. Journal of Industrial information integration, 2018. 9: p. 14-23.
[14] Hinds, M., The US, the UK and Saudi Arabia in World War II: the Middle East and the origins of a special relationship. 2016: Bloomsbury Publishing.
[15] Maponya, S.H., The role of the principal as instructional leader in improving learner achievement in South African primary schools. 2015, University of South Africa.
[16] Jakimoski, K., Challenges of interoperability and integration in education information systems. International Journal of Database and Theory and Application, 2016. 9(2): p. 33-46.
[17] Collins, L. and L. Fruth, The right data to the right people at the right time: How interoperability helps America’s students succeed. Retrieved February, 2007. 22: p. 2014.
[18] Cooper, A., Learning analytics interoperability-the big picture in brief. Learning Analytics Community Exchange, 2014.
[19] Ise, O.A., Towards a Unified University information system: bridging the gap of data interoperability. American Journal of Software Engineering, 2014. 2(2): p. 26-32.
[20] Munn, Z., et al., Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC medical research methodology, 2018. 18(1): p. 143.
[21] Levac, D., H. Colquhoun, and K.K. O'Brien, Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation science, 2010. 5(1): p. 69.
[22] Maremi, K., M. Herselman, and A. Botha. Scoping the aspects and capabilities of South African School Administration and Management Systems (SA-SAMS). in 2020 Conference on Information Communications Technology and Society (ICTAS). 2020. IEEE.
[23] Arksey, H. and L. O'Malley, Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International journal of social research methodology, 2005. 8(1): p. 19-32.
[24] Rezaei, R., et al., Interoperability evaluation models: A systematic review. Computers in Industry, 2014. 65(1): p. 1-23.
[25] Ostadzadeh, S. and F. Shams, Towards a software architecture maturity model for improving ultra-large-scale systems interoperability. arXiv preprint arXiv:1401.5752, 2014.
[26] Thinley, P., Technical comments on the design and designation of biological corridors in Bhutan: global to national perspectives. Journal of Renewable Natural Resources, Bhutan, 2010. 6: p. 91-106.
[27] Guédria, W., Y. Naudet, and D. Chen. Interoperability maturity models–survey and comparison–. in OTM Confederated International Conferences" On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems". 2008. Springer.
[28] Lane, J.A. and R. Valerdi. System interoperability influence on system of systems engineering effort. in Proceedings of the Conference on Systems Engineering Research. 2011.
[29] Ostadzadeh, S.S., F. Shams, and K. Badie, An architectural model framework to improve digital ecosystems interoperability, in New trends in networking, computing, e-learning, systems sciences, and engineering. 2015, Springer. p. 513-520.
[30] Campos, C., et al., Maturity model for interoperability potential measurement. Information systems management, 2013. 30(3): p. 218-234.
[31] Van Staden, S. and J. Mbale, The Information Systems Interoperability Maturity Model (ISIMM): towards standardizing technical interoperability and assessment within government. International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business, 2012. 4(5): p. 36.
[32] Anggoro, B.K., M. Hubeis, and I. Sailah, Information system interoperability maturity model. Bulletin of Social Informatics Theory and Application, 2018. 2(1): p. 22-33.
[33] Chalmeta, R. and V. Pazos, A step-by-step methodology for enterprise interoperability projects. Enterprise Information Systems, 2015. 9(4): p. 436-464.
[34] Rouen, I., Simulation and optimization of interoperability planning. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 2013. 52(3).
[35] Daclin, N., D. Chen, and B. Vallespir, Developing enterprise collaboration: a methodology to implement and improve interoperability. Enterprise Information Systems, 2016. 10(5): p. 467-504.
[36] Cestari, J.M.A., E.R. Loures, and E.A.P. Santos. Interoperability assessment approaches for enterprise and public administration. in OTM Confederated International Conferences" On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems". 2013. Springer.
[37] Espadinha-Cruz, P. and A. Grilo, The Business Interoperability Decomposition Framework to analyse buyer-supplier dyads. Computers in Industry, 2019. 109: p. 165-181.
[38] Sulehat, N., C.A. Taib, and K.A. Ishak, The Moderating Effect of IT Knowledge on the relationship between Organizational Factors and Information Systems. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 2017. 11(10): p. 118-127.
[39] Vallespir, B. and Y. Ducq, Enterprise modelling: from early languages to models transformation. International Journal of Production Research, 2018. 56(8): p. 2878-2896.
[40] Almeida Prado Cestari, J.M., et al., A capability model for public administration interoperability. Enterprise Information Systems, 2019: p. 1-31.
[41] Zutshi, A., A. Grilo, and R. Jardim-Goncalves, The business interoperability quotient measurement model. Computers in Industry, 2012. 63(5): p. 389-404.