Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32586
PM10 Concentration Emitted from Blasting and Crushing Processes of Limestone Mines in Saraburi Province, Thailand

Authors: Kanokrat Makkwao, Tassanee Prueksasit


This study aimed to investigate PM10 emitted from different limestone mines in Saraburi province, Thailand. The blasting and crushing were the main processes selected for PM10 sampling. PM10 was collected in two mines including, a limestone mine for cement manufacturing (mine A) and a limestone mine for construction (mine B). The IMPACT samplers were used to collect PM10. At blasting, the points aligning with the upwind and downwind direction were assigned for the sampling. The ranges of PM10 concentrations at mine A and B were 0.267-5.592 and 0.130-0.325 mg/m³, respectively, and the concentration at blasting from mine A was significantly higher than mine B (p < 0.05). During crushing at mine A, the PM10 concentration with the range of 1.153-3.716 and 0.085-1.724 mg/m³ at crusher and piles in respectively were observed whereas the PM10 concentration measured at four sampling points in mine B, including secondary crusher, tertiary crusher, screening point, and piles, were ranged 1.032-16.529, 10.957-74.057, 0.655-4.956, and 0.169-1.699 mg/m³, respectively. The emission of PM10 concentration at the crushing units was different in the ranges depending on types of machine, its operation, dust collection and control system, and environmental conditions.

Keywords: Blasting, crushing, limestone mines, PM10 concentration.

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 367


[1] Department Primary Industries and Mines, The mineral situation of Thailand in 2018 and Trends for 2019. 2019.
[2] Department Primary Industries and Mines, Mineral Statistics of Thailand 2014 – 2018. Statistics Report, 2019: p. P.43-47.
[3] Sairanen, M. and M. Rinne, Dust emission from crushing of hard rock aggregates. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 2019. 10(2): p. 656-664.
[4] Degan, G., D. Lippiello, and M. Pinzari, Monitoring airborne dust in an Italian basalt quarry: Comparison between sampling methods. Vol. 174. 2013. 75-84.
[5] Chang, C.-T., et al., Fugitive Dust Emission Source Profiles and Assessment of Selected Control Strategies for Particulate Matter at Gravel Processing Sites in Taiwan. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2010. 60(10): p. 1262-1268.
[6] Jayabalou, R., et al., Particulate Matter from Stone Crushing Industry: Size Distribution and Health Effects. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2006. 132: p. 405.
[7] Roy, S., G.R. Adhikari, and T.N. Singh, Development of Emission Factors for Quantification of Blasting Dust at Surface %J Journal of Environmental Protection. 2010. Vol.01No.04: p. 16.
[8] US.EPA, AP 42, Fifth Edition, Volume I Chapter 11: Mineral Products Industry, in 11.19.2 Crushed Stone Processing and Pulverized Mineral Processing. 2004. p. 5-7.
[9] Morera de la Vall González, G., Dust production in mining supression measures in quarry blasting, in Ingeniería Geológica y Minera. 2018: E.T.S.I. de Minas y Energía (UPM).
[10] Chang, C.-T., Assessment of Influential Range and Characteristics of Fugitive Dust in Limestone Extraction Processes. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2004. 54(2): p. 141-148.
[11] Oguntoke, O., A. Adeniyi, and G.T. Adeola, Impact of Granite Quarrying on the Health of Workers and Nearby Residents in Abeokuta Ogun State, Nigeria. Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management, 2009. 2.
[12] Richardson, C.M., Quantification and Characterisation of Particulates from Australian Coal Mines: Towards Improved Emissions Estimation, in School of Eng & Built Env. 2019, Griffith University.
[13] Sivacoumar, R., et al., Modeling of fugitive dust emission and control measures in stone crushing industry. Journal of environmental monitoring: JEM, 2009. 11: p. 987-97.