Induced Affectivity and Impact on Creativity: Personal Growth and Perceived Adjustment when Narrating an Intense Emotional Experience

Authors: S. Da Costa, D. Páez, F. Sánchez

Abstract:

We examine the causal role of positive affect on creativity, the association of creativity or innovation in the ideation phase with functional emotional regulation, successful adjustment to stress and dispositional emotional creativity, as well as the predictive role of creativity for positive emotions and social adjustment. The study examines the effects of modification of positive affect on creativity. Participants write three poems, narrate an infatuation episode, answer a scale of personal growth after this episode and perform a creativity task, answer a flow scale after creativity task and fill a dispositional emotional creativity scale. High and low positive effect was induced by asking subjects to write three poems about high and low positive connotation stimuli. In a neutral condition, tasks were performed without previous affect induction. Subjects on the condition of high positive affect report more positive and less negative emotions, more personal growth (effect size r = .24) and their last poem was rated as more original by judges (effect size r = .33). Mediational analysis showed that positive emotions explain the influence of the manipulation on personal growth - positive affect correlates r = .33 to personal growth. The emotional creativity scale correlated to creativity scores of the creative task (r = .14), to the creativity of the narration of the infatuation episode (r = .21). Emotional creativity was also associated, during performing the creativity task, with flow (r = .27) and with affect balance (r = .26). The mediational analysis showed that emotional creativity predicts flow through positive affect. Results suggest that innovation in the phase of ideation is associated with a positive affect balance and satisfactory performance, as well as dispositional emotional creativity is adaptive.

Keywords: Affectivity, creativity, induction, innovation, psychological factors.

References:

[1] Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood creativity research: hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus?. Psychological Bulletin, 134(6), 779–806. doi: 10.1037/a0012815
[2] Averill J. R. (1999). Individual differences in emotional creativity: structure and correlates. Journal of. Personality, 67, 331–371. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00058
[3] da Costa, S., Páez, D., Sánchez, F., Garaigordobil, M., & Gondim, S. (2015). Personal factors of creativity: A second order meta-analysis. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(3), 165–173. doi: 10.1016/j.rpto.2015.06.002
[4] Davis, M. A. (2009). Understanding the relationship between mood and creativity: a meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 25–38. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.04.001
[5] Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Positive emotions broaden and build. In P. G. Devine & E. A. Plant (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 47 (pp. 1–53). Burlington, VT: Academic Press.
[6] Oriol X, Amutio A, Mendoza M, da Costa S and Miranda R (2016). Emotional Creativity as Predictor of Intrinsic Motivation and Academic Engagement in University Students: The Mediating Role of Positive Emotions. Frontiers of Psychology. 7:1243.doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01243
[7] Soroa, G., Gorostiaga, A., Aritzeta, A. & Balluerka, N. (2015) A Shortened Spanish Version of the Emotional Creativity Inventory (the ECI-S), Creativity Research Journal, 27:2, 232-239, doi: 10.1080/10400419.2015.1030313
[8] Trnka, R.; Zahradnik, M & Kuška, M. (2016). Emotional creativity and real-life involvement in different types of creative leisure activities. Creativity Research Journal, 28, No. 3, 348-356
[9] Gutbezahl, J., & Averill, J. R. (1996). Individual Differences in Emotional creativity a manifested in words and pictures. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 237-337.
[10] Ivcevic, Z., Brackett, M. A., & Mayer, J. D. (2007). Emotional intelligence and emotional creativity. Journal of Personality, 75, 199–236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00437.x
[11] Rufi, S., Javaloy, F., Batista-Foguet, J., Solanas, A., & Páez, D. (2014). Flow Dimensions on Daily Activities with the Spanish Version of the Flow Scale (DFS). The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17, E30. doi:10.1017/sjp.2014.34
[12] Eisenberg, J. & Thompson, W.F. (2011). The effects of competition on improvisers’: motivation, stress and creative performance. Creativity Research Journal, 23(2), 129-136. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2011.571185
[13] da Costa, S. (2018). They didn´t know it was impossible so they did it!. Procesos de creatividad e innovación en sistemas sociales complejos abiertos: afectividad, motivación y cognición. Doctoral Thesis from University of the Basque Country. Available in http://hdl.handle.net/10810/29428
[14] Baer, J., & McKool, S. S. (2009). Assessing creativity using the consensual assessment technique. In C. S. Schreiner (Ed.), Handbook of Research on assessment technologies, methods, and applications in higher education (pp. 65–77). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
[15] Artola, T., Barraca, J., Mosteiro, P., Ancillo, I., Poveda, B., & Sánchez, N. (2012). PIC-A: Prueba de imaginación creativa para adultos. Madrid: TEA.
[PIC-A Test of creative imagination for adults
[16] Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Positive emotions broaden and build. In P. G. Devine & E. A. Plant (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 47 (pp. 1–53). Burlington, VT: Academic Press
[17] Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (1996). The posttraumatic growth inventory: measuring the positive legacy of trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9, 455–71. doi: 10.1007/BF02103658
[18] Preacher, A. (2017). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Second Edition. New York: Guilford Press.
[19] Mahasneh, A.M. & Gazo, A.M. (2019). Effect of the Training Program to Improve Emotional Creativity among Undergraduate Students. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 12, (3) 137–148. doi: 10.11621/pir.2019.0310