Assessing and Evaluating the Course Outcomes of Electrical Circuit Course for Bachelor of Science in Electrical and Electronic Engineering Program
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32919
Assessing and Evaluating the Course Outcomes of Electrical Circuit Course for Bachelor of Science in Electrical and Electronic Engineering Program

Authors: Muhibul Haque Bhuyan, Sher Shermin Azmiri Khan

Abstract:

At present, it is an imperative and stimulating task to grow the concepts and skills of undergraduate students in any course. Educators must build up students' higher-order complex and critical thinking abilities. But many of them find it difficult to assess and evaluate these abilities of students who undertake their courses during undergraduate studies. In this research work, a simple assessment and evaluation process for the electrical circuit course of the undergraduate Electrical and Electronic Engineering (EEE) program is reported using the Outcome-Based Education (OBE) approach. The methodology of the work, course contents design, course outcomes (COs) preparation and mapping it with program outcomes (POs), question setting following Bloom's taxonomy, assessment strategy of the students, CO and PO evaluation records, statistics, and charts have been reported for a student-cohort of electrical circuit course taken in Spring 2019 Semester at EEE Department of Southeast University (SEU). It is found that the benchmark fixed by the course instructor has been achieved by the students of that course through CO assessment and evaluation. Recommendations of the course teacher for further quality enhancement based on CO achievement are also presented.

Keywords: OBE, COs, POs, assessment and evaluation, electrical circuit course.

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 592

References:


[1] M. H. Bhuyan and A. Tamir, “Evaluating COs of Computer Programming Course for OBE-based BSc in EEE Program,” International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 1986-4558, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 86-99, 2020.
[2] BAETE, (2017). Board of Accreditation for Engineering and Technical Education. Accreditation Manual for Undergraduate Engineering Programs, 1st Edition, April 2017, http://www.baetebangladesh.org/ download.php, access date 15 April 2020.
[3] BAETE, (2019). Board of Accreditation for Engineering and Technical Education. the Institution of Engineers, Bangladesh. Accreditation Manual for Undergraduate Engineering Programs, 2nd Edition, March 2019. webpage link of BAETE Manual, version 2, http://www.baetebangladesh.org/2nd_edi_05.03.2019_F.pdf, access date 15 April 2020.
[4] BAETE, (2020). List of Programs under Process of Accreditation, http://www.baetebangladesh.org/now.php and List of Accredited Programs, http://www.baetebangladesh.org/programs.php, access date 15 April 2020.
[5] UGC, (2020). List of Public, Private and International Universities in Bangladesh. University Grants Commission, Agargaon, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh. http://www.ugc-universities.gov.bd/public-universities, http://www.ugc-universities.gov.bd/private-universities, http://www.ugc-universities.gov.bd/international-universities, access date 15 April 2020.
[6] T. Sikander, H. Aziz, A. Wasim, S. Hussain and M. Jahanzaib, “Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) Framework: A Case of Industrial Engineering Department,” International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 107-119, 2017.
[7] A. Rajak, A. K. Shrivastava and D. P. Shrivastava, “Course Outcome Attainments in OBE for Weak Students,” International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), ISSN: 2278-3075, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 506-509, 2019.
[8] M. H. Rashid, “The Process of Outcome-Based Education-Implementation, Assessment and Evaluations,” American Society for Engineering Education, ASEE International Forum, Paper ID #8242, http://www.asee.org/public/conferences/27/papers/, 2013, access date 15 April 2020.
[9] V. K. Chandna, “Innovative Methodology for the Assessment of Programme Outcomes,” 2014 IEEE International Conference on MOOCs Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE), pp. 264-267.
[10] P. Jayarekha and M. Dakshayini, “Programme Outcomes Assessment by Direct Method,” 2014 IEEE International Conference on MOOCs Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE), pp. 27-31.
[11] V. K. Chandna, “Course outcome assessment and improvement on weak student,” 2015 IEEE International Conference on MOOCs Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE), pp. 38-40.
[12] R. Mahadevan, N. C. Shivaprakash, N. T. Khobragade, K. Raju and V. V. N. Rao, “Implementing a sustainable methodology for assessment of course outcomes and program outcomes in an Indian Engineering Institute,” Proceedings of 2013 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE), Bali, Indonesia, pp. 51-54.
[13] ABET: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. (2010). Computing Accreditation Commission. Criteria for accrediting computing programs. Retrieved from http://www.abet.org, accessed on 7 August 2019.
[14] L. Alzubaidi, “Program Outcomes Assessment using Key Performance Indicators,” Proceeding of 62nd ISERD International Conference, Boston, USA, 2017.
[15] C. Asheim, A. Gowan and H. Reichgelt, “Establishing an assessment process for a computing program,” Information Systems Education Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, 2017.
[16] H. A. M. Abdeljaber and S. Ahmad, “Program Outcomes Assessment Method for Multi-Academic Accreditation Bodies: Computer Science Program as a Case Study,” International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), vo.. 12, no. 5, pp. 23-35, 2017.
[17] N. A. Mustaffa, M. Zulkifliand and R. I. Z. Murat, “Measuring Course Learning Outcome for Large Class of Introductory Statistics Course,” International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), ISSN: 2278-3075, vol. 8, no. 7S2, pp. 382-388, 2019.
[18] R. Terry, W. V. Wilding, R. Lewis and D. Olsen, “The Use of Direct and Indirect Evidence to Assess University, Program and Course Level Objectives and Student Competencies,” Chemical Engineering Paper, Proceedings of the 2007 Annual Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii. USA, https://peer.asee.org/2564.
[19] J. Shaeiwitz and D. Briedis, “Direct Assessment Measures,” Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, ISSN: 2153-5965, ISBN: 12.548.1-11, Honolulu, Hawaii. USA, https://peer.asee.org/1537.
[20] H. A. Harvey, M. Krudysz and A. D. Walser, “Direct Assessment of Engineering Programs at the City College of New York,” Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), T1H-1-T1H-7.
[21] G. Rogers, “Do Grades Make the Grade for Program Assessment,” 2003, retrieved from http://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/do-grades-make-the-grade.pdf, accessed on 27 August 2019.
[22] A.-K. Carstensen and J. Bernhard, “Threshold Concepts and Keys to the Portal of Understanding: Some Examples from Electrical Engineering,” In: Threshold Concepts within the Disciplines. Series: Educational Futures, vol. 16, no. 11, e-ISBN: 9789460911477, Brill, pp. 143–154, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789460911477_012, access date 15 April 2020.
[23] M. Krudysz and A. Wittig, “Challenges in Assessing Multidisciplinary Programs between Engineering and Non-Engineering Schools,” American Society for Engineering Education, 2011.
[24] M. H. Bhuyan and S. S. A. Khan, “Motivating Students in Electrical Circuit Course,” International Journal of Learning and Teaching, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 137–147, 2018.
[25] D. Nicoletti and J. A. Orr, “An Implementable/Sustainable Outcomes Assessment Process for an Electrical Engineering Program,” Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.
[26] S. Slade, “What do we mean by a quality education,” The blog of 2017, Link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sean-slade/what-do-we-mean-by-a-qual_b_9284130.html, accessed on 20 August 2019.
[27] R. Mehdi and M. A. Naaj, “Academic Program Assessment: A Case Study of a Pragmatic Approach,” Creative Education Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 71-81, 2013. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.41010.
[28] UGC, (2018). Guidelines for Preparing Standard Curriculum of Four Year Degree in Engineering Program. University Grants Commission of Bangladesh. http://www.ugc.gov.bd/site/view/policies/-, access date 15 April 2020.
[29] EEE-PO, (2020), Program Outcomes of the BSc in EEE Program, https://seu.edu.bd/dept/eee.php?id=poutcomes, accessed on 20 October 2020.
[30] H. Gurocak, “Direct Measures for Course Outcomes Assessment for ABET Accreditation,” 2008 Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education.
[31] M. H. Bhuyan, “Teaching Electrical Circuits Course for Electrical Engineering Students in Cognitive Domain,” Journal of Bangladesh Electronics Society, vol. 14, no. 1-2, pp. 83-91, 2014.
[32] M. H. Bhuyan and S. S. A. Khan, “Teaching a Numerical Analysis Course for Electrical Engineering Students in the Cognitive Domain,” International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, Manchester University Press, UK, ISSN e: 2050-4578, p: 0020-7209, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 82-92, 2014.
[33] M. H. Bhuyan, S. S. A. Khan and M. Z. Rahman, “Teaching Analog Electronics Course for Electrical Engineering Students in Cognitive Domain,” Journal of Electrical Engineering (JEE), the Institution of Engineers Bangladesh (IEB), Dhaka, Bangladesh, vol. EE 40, no. I-II, pp. 52-58, 2014.
[34] K. Sanders, and R. McCartney, “Program Assessment Tools in Computer Science: A Report from the Trenches,” ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, vol. 35, no. 1, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1145/792548.611926, accessed on 18 August 2019.
[35] M. Koh, E. Rodriguez-Marek and C. Talarico, “Development of Course Assessment Metrics to Measure Program Outcomes against ABET Criteria in a Digital Circuits Class,” Annual Conference and Exposition of American Society for Engineering Education, 14-17 June 2009, Austin, Texas, USA, pp. 1-14, doi:10.18260/1-2--4631.