International Service Learning 3.0: Using Technology to Improve Outcomes and Sustainability

Authors: Anthony Vandarakis

Abstract:

Today’s International Service Learning practices require an update: modern technologies, fresh educational frameworks, and a new operating system to accountably prosper. This paper describes a model of International Service Learning (ISL), which combines current technological hardware, electronic platforms, and asynchronous communications that are grounded in inclusive pedagogy. This model builds on the work around collaborative field trip learning, extending the reach to international partnerships across continents. Mobile technology, 21^st century skills and summit-basecamp modeling intersect to support novel forms of learning that tread lightly on fragile natural ecosystems, affirm local reciprocal partnership in projects, and protect traveling participants from common yet avoidable cultural pitfalls.

Keywords: International Service Learning, ISL, field experiences, mobile technology, ‘out there in here’, summit basecamp pedagogy.

References:

[1] Mason, Meghan R, and Elizabeth Dunens. “Service-Learning as a Practical Introduction to Undergraduate Public Health: Benefits for Student Outcomes and Accreditation.” Frontiers in public health vol. 7 63. 2 Apr. 2019, doi:10.3389/fpubh.2019.00063
[2] Dewey, J. Experience and Education. Touchstone, 1938.
[3] Sherrill, Mike. "Global Service Learning and Higher Education," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, 2015.
[4] Gonzalo, Duarte. “Good to Go: Standards of Practice in Global Service Learning” Carlton University Press, 2014.
[5] Dewey, John. Philosophy of Education: (Problems of Men). Littlefield, Adams, 1958.
[6] Hildebrand, David, "John Dewey", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = .
[7] Siemens, George. “Learning Analytics and Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning.” Distance Education, vol. 40, no. 3, Mar. 2019, pp. 414–418, doi:10.1080/01587919.2019.1656153.
[8] Gold, Raymond L. “The Ethnographic Method in Sociology.” Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 3, no. 4, 1997, pp. 388–402., doi:10.1177/107780049700300402.
[9] Devault, Marjorie L. “Introduction: What Is Institutional Ethnography?” Social Problems, vol. 53, no. 3, 2006, pp. 294–298., doi:10.1525/sp.2006.53.3.294.
[10] Alderson, Priscilla. (1995) “Ethics.” Understanding Research with Children and Young People, pp. 85–102., doi:10.4135/9781526435637.n6.
[11] Brayfield, A. “The Sociology of Childhood.” By William A. Corsaro. Pine Forge Press, 1997. Social Forces, vol. 78, no. 4, Jan. 2000, pp. 1583–1585., doi:10.1093/sf/78.4.1583.
[12] Strandell, Harriet. “Book Reviews: Allison James, Chris Jenks & Alan Prout: Theorizing Childhood. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998.” Acta Sociologica, vol. 41, no. 4, 1998, pp. 395–398., doi:10.1177/000169939804100416.
[13] Underberg, Natalie M., and Elayne Zorn. Digital Ethnography: Anthropology, Narrative, and New Media. University of Texas Press, 2014.
[14] Soukup, Charles. “The Postmodern Ethnographic Flaneur and the Study of Hyper-Mediated Everyday Life.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, vol. 42, no. 2, 2012, pp. 226–254., doi:10.1177/0891241612461278.
[15] Castells, Manuel, Mireia Fernandez-Ardevol, Jack Qiu, and Araba Sey. 2007. Mobile Communication and Society: A Global Perspective. Cambridge: MIT Press.
[16] Hallett, Ronald E. Educational Experiences of Hidden Homeless Teenagers: Living Doubled-Up. Routledge, 2012.
[17] Ospina S, Anderson G. The Action Turn. In Coghlan D, Brydon-Miller M, editors, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Action Research. 1st ed. Sage. 2014. p. 18-21
[18] Rabinow, Paul. Marking Time: On the Anthropology of the Contemporary. Princeton University Press, 2009.
[19] Watson, Mark K. “Pedagogy in Action: Rethinking Ethnographic Training and Practice in Action.” Final Draft Forthcoming in Anthropology in Action, vol. 26, no. 3, 2020.
[20] “Home.” Outward Bound International, 21 Feb. 2019, www.outwardbound.net/.
[21] Benford, S., Giannachi, G., Koleva, B. & Rodden, T. 2009. From Interaction to Trajectories: Designing Coherent Journeys Through User Experiences, Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press. 709718.
[22] Schnädelbach H., Rennick Egglestone, S., Reeves, S., Benford, S., Walker, B., Wright, M., ‘Performing Thrill: Designing Telemetry Systems and Spectator Interfaces for Amusement Rides’, CHI 2008, Florence, 2008.
[23] Collins, T., Gaved, M., Mulholland, P., Kerawalla, C., Twiner, A., Scanlon, E., Jones, A., Littleton, K., Conole, G. & Tosunoglu, C. 2008. “Supporting location-based inquiry learning across school, field and home contexts”, Proceedings of MLearn 2008.
[24] Coughlan, Tim, et al. “Designing for Balance: Out There and In Here.” Jan. 2010, doi:10.14236/ewic/hci2010.58.
[25] “GSE.Harvard.” Harvard Graduate School of Education, 01 March, 2019, https://www.gse.harvard.edu/news/uk/16/11/how-thrive-21st-century.