The Effect on Lead Times When Normalizing a Supply Chain Process

Authors: Bassam Istanbouli

Abstract:

Organizations are living in a very competitive and dynamic environment which is constantly changing. In order to achieve a high level of service, the products and processes of these organizations need to be flexible and evolvable. If the supply chains are not modular and well designed, changes can bring combinatorial effects to most areas of a company from its management, financial, documentation, logistics and its information structure. Applying the normalized system’s concept to segments of the supply chain may help in reducing those ripple effects, but it may also increase lead times. Lead times are important and can become a decisive element in gaining customers. Industries are always under the pressure in providing good quality products, at competitive prices, when and how the customer wants them. Most of the time, the customers want their orders now, if not yesterday. The above concept will be proven by examining lead times in a manufacturing example before and after applying normalized systems concept to that segment of the chain. We will then show that although we can minimize the combinatorial effects when changes occur, the lead times will be increased.

Keywords: Supply chain, lead time, normalization, modular.

References:

[1] Ghaderi, H., 2016, Reducing lead-times and lead-time variance in cooperative distribution networks. Int. J. Shipping and Transport Logistics, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2016
[2] Mannaert, H., Verelst, J., De Bruyn, P., 2016. Normalized Systems Theory, From Foundations for Evolvable Software Toward a General Theory for Evolvable Design.
[3] Ciraci, S. and van den Broek, P., 2006. Evolvability as a quality attribute of software architectures. Journal of Physics Conference Series, January 2006.
[4] https://normalizedsystems.org/
[5] McIlroy, M.D., 1968. Mass Produced Software Components. NATO Conference on Software Engineering, 1968, pp 138-155
[6] Langlois, R.N., 2002. Modularity in technology and organization. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 49, pp 19-37
[7] Parnas, D.L., Clements, P.C. and Weiss, D.M., 1984. The Modular Structure of Complex Systems. IEEE, 1984, pp 408-417
[8] Baldwin, C.Y. and Clark, K.B., 1997. Managing in an Age of Modularity. Harvard Business Review.
[9] Lehman, M.M., 1980. Programs, Life Cycles, and Laws of Software Evolution. Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 68, pp. 1060-1076